Guest guest Posted May 31, 2005 Report Share Posted May 31, 2005 Hi folks: I have been unable to find this study, but research in fruit flies seems to suggest that restriction of fat and/or protein may be much more important than carbohydrate restriction to the life extension derived from CR. (Jeff will be pleased to hear this, LOL): " Yeast intake linked [inversely] to longevity in fruit flies. ........... Restricting the amount of yeast in the [fruit fly] diet can increase life expectancy by 50%, research into fruit flies has shown. It is not yet clear whether the same might be true in humans. But the authors say their findings hint it might be what you eat rather than total calorie intake that influences longevity, contrary to current belief. (Warren will NOT be pleased to hear THIS, LOL) The University College London team [explained] how it could be down to metabolic pathways triggered by foods. Quality not quantity ............... Lead researcher Professor Partridge said: " Yeast and sugar trigger different metabolic pathways with different effects on life span. " The dramatic impact of reducing yeast [the food source providing fat and protein in the fruit fly diet] suggests that protein or fat plays a greater role in fly longevity than sugar. " She said the results made a " strong case " that calories per se are not the important factor in prolonging life - at least in fruit flies. A spokesman from the International Longevity Centre UK said: " At this point in time, it is difficult to state whether or not diet, rather than simply calorific intake, has a major bearing on life expectancy in humans. " " http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4583063.stm Rodney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.