moderate CR (wasRe: Question from a new member)

[Guest guest]

> Not so. In our files are references that discuss that as little as

10% CR

> is of benefit. You are a newcomer and I gather from your post

below that

> you have not read the files. Your introductory message instructs

you to

> please do so, so that we don't have to go over the same ground

every time a

> newbie joins the group.

>

> This group urges MODERATE CR. Read the group description as well

as the

> files.

>

>

I understand that. Nevertheless, 10% CR still requires more dicpline

than simply taking a pill. Is the purpose of this forum to promote

health and longevity by means of CR, or simply CR, even if aging can

be slowed by other means? If the same results can be achieved without

CR doesn't the alternative still have merit and isn't it still worthy

of discussion? I'm happy to examine the evidence, aren't you?