Guest guest Posted April 24, 2008 Report Share Posted April 24, 2008 Blood transfusions found to harm some patients a.. 26 April 2008 b.. NewScientist.com news service c.. Nowak " For the life of the flesh is in the blood. No soul of you shall eat blood. " So says the Bible's book of Leviticus, and it is for this reason that Jehovah's Witnesses shun blood transfusions. They do not, however, shun surgery. As long as surgeons use special techniques, Jehovah's Witnesses can have surgery - including operations with the greatest potential for blood loss, such as open-heart surgery - without ever receiving a drop of someone else's blood. Now some surgeons and anaesthetists are questioning whether every patient shouldn't get the same treatment. Over the past decade a number of studies have found that, far from saving lives, blood transfusions can actually harm many patients. The problem is not the much-publicised risk of blood-borne infectious agents, such as HIV, but the blood itself. Study after study has shown that transfusions, particularly those containing red blood cells, are linked to higher death rates in patients who have had a heart attack, undergone heart surgery, or who are in critical care. The exact nature of the link is uncertain, but it seems likely that chemical changes in ageing blood, their impact on the immune system, and the blood's ability to deliver oxygen are key. In fact, most experts now agree that the risk posed by the transfused blood itself is far greater than that of a blood-borne infection. " Probably 40 to 60 per cent of blood transfusions are not good for the patients, " says Bruce Spiess, a cardiac anaesthesiologist at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond. Such claims have led this week to the US National Institutes of Health issuing a call for proposals to study the problem. Also this week, the Joint Commission in Chicago, which accredits US hospitals, is holding the first of several meetings to look for ways to reduce the risks. It is expected to at least conclude that hospitals should be more selective in the use of transfusions. Full story http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19826533.500 & print=true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.