Guest guest Posted March 18, 2011 Report Share Posted March 18, 2011 If I read the presentation right, half were discontinued. This seems like a very discouraging thing! I know that 30% response in a refractory population is something, but perhaps those who know more, like Dr. Furman, can speak to why CAL-101 is so encouraging if half have disease progression, adverse effects or death. Thanks, Heléne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2011 Report Share Posted March 21, 2011 Dear Helene, I think the enthusiasm is based on its very good activity as a single agent in a very difficult population with a very good toxicity profile. Completed (12 cycles)* 3 (3%) On study 49 (46%) Discontinued 54 (51%) Disease progression 33 (31%) Adverse event 7 (7%) Death 4(4%) Other reason 10 (9%) It seems that most discontinuations were from progression, which is pretty low and not unexpected for a single agent in this population. And i'm assuming that deaths were not treatment-related, given the low AE rate. That only 3% completed the 12 cyles, and we don't have long term follow-up are reasons we should not rush to judgment about this promising investigational agent. All the best, Karl > If I read the presentation right, half were discontinued. > This seems like a very discouraging thing! > > I know that 30% response in a refractory population is something, > but perhaps those who know more, like Dr. Furman, can speak to why CAL-101 is so encouraging if half have disease progression, adverse effects or death. > > Thanks, Heléne > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2011 Report Share Posted March 22, 2011 Dear Helene, Please note that the presentation referenced is from ASCO last spring. So it is almost a year old. A more recent presentation (from ASH in December) can be found on calistogapharma.com. But your point about 50% discontinuing is still valid. So the main difference is that there are more CLL patients who have been on CAL-101 for 12 months or more. I have been taking it for almost 16 months. I am unmutated with del 17p. So CAL-101 has been great for me. But I may also have to discontinue it due to progression. My lymphocyte count has gone up on each of my last 3 blood tests (taken every 8 weeks). It was 8.5 on Aug. 19 and 28.1 on Feb. 3. But my nodes are stable (by CT scan), and hemoglobin and platelets are also pretty stable. If the progression continues, I may be able to add rituxin to see if that helps. So CAL-101 definitely has value. But it will not be a long term solution for everyone, and possibly not for anyone. All the best, Don Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.