Guest guest Posted May 3, 2011 Report Share Posted May 3, 2011 For research advocates: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/G uidances/UCM236669.pdf A snip from FDA guidance to the industry: DETERMINING WHETHER CODEVELOPMENT IS AN APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT OPTION Concurrent development of two or more novel drugs for use in combination generally will provide less information about the safety and effectiveness of the individual drugs than would be obtained if the individual drugs were developed alone. How much less will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the stage of development at which the individual drug components cease to be studied independently. For example, in codevelopment scenarios in which rapid development of resistance to monotherapy is a major concern, it may not be possible or appropriate to obtain clinical data for the individual components of the combination beyond phase 1 testing. Because codevelopment will generally provide less information about the safety and effectiveness of the individual drugs, it will present greater risk compared to development of an individual drug. Therefore, FDA believes that codevelopment should ordinarily be reserved for situations that meet the following criteria: .. The combination is intended to treat a serious disease or condition. ..There is a compelling biological rationale for use of the combination (e.g., the agents inhibit distinct targets in the same molecular pathway, provide inhibition of both a primary and compensatory pathway, or inhibit the same target at different binding sites to decrease resistance or allow use of lower doses to minimize toxicity). .. A preclinical model (in vivo or in vitro) or short-term clinical study on an established biomarker suggests that the combination has substantial activity and provides greater than additive activity or a more durable response (e.g., delayed resistance) compared to the individual agents alone. ..There is a compelling reason for why the agents cannot be developed individually (e.g., monotherapy for the disease of interest leads to resistance and/or one or both of the agents would be expected to have very limited activity when used as monotherapy). FDA recommends that sponsors consult with FDA on the appropriateness of codevelopment before initiation of clinical development of the combination. Patients Against Lymphoma www.Lymphomation.org Evidence-based information on lymphoma, independent of health industry funding Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.