Guest guest Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Al posted an interesting paper discussing the effects of CR and temperature on flies (below). It is interesting that a higher environmental temperature for flies " increases the rate of aging by inflicting permanent debilitation and that thermal history is a major determinant of mortality " What are the consequences for warm-blooded humans who have thermal regulation systems? Dr. Walford mentions in BT120YD that high temperature is a source of stress and that calorically restricted humans will display lower body temperature (pp. 82, 163, 228). Perhaps the one or two degree lowering of average body temperature over many years by CR may play a role in longevity. All this raises interesting questions: 1) should you raise the thermostat when you are cold? 2) should you participate in high-energy sports that raise your body temperature? 3) should you work (or lie on the beach) in the hot sun? According to the paper " Death occurs when the combined effects of risk and damage are sufficiently great " Food for thought. Tony Oops.. CR for thought ;-) === Mair W, Goymer P, Pletcher SD, Partridge L. Demography of dietary restriction and death in Drosophila. Science. 2003 Sep 19;301(5640):1731-3. PMID: 14500985 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstra\ ct & list_uids=14500985 & query_hl=61 Dietary restriction (DR) prolongs life-span and delays the onset of many age-related declines in function (1–4). In Drosophila, DR is applied by maintenance of adult flies on a food medium that contains roughly 35% less yeast and sugar than standard laboratory medium (2, 5). Both mean and maximum life-span are increased under DR conditions (5). Age-specific mortality is a measure of the instantaneous hazard of death for an individual at a given age. Unlike survivorship analysis, which is a cumulative measure, age-specific mortality allows independent comparisons of vulner-ability to death at different ages (6, 7). In Drosophila, chronic DR results in a delay in the onset of a detectable aging-related increase in mortality (5). Once the mortality increase is detected, however, it proceeds at roughly the same rate in DR and control flies (5). Interventions can lower adult mortality by slowing the accumulation of the irreversible damage that is characteristic of aging (aging-related damage), by reducing short-term vulnerability to death (risk), or by some combination of the two (8). We can distinguish these hypotheses experimentally for DR by examining the effect of past and current nutritional conditions on age-specific mortality. This type of approach has shown that, in Drosophila, increased reproductive activity in males (8) and yeast deprivation in females (9) result in a higher mortality that is entirely due to an increased risk of death. In contrast, Mediterranean fruit flies (Ceratitis capitata) switched from sugar only to sugar and yeast food were permanently affected by their previous diet (10). If DR acts solely by slowing the accumulation of aging-related damage, then the onset of DR would not lead to a drop in mortality rate, because the damage would not be reversed. However, DR would result in a slower subsequent accumulation of aging-related damage and, hence, a less rapid subsequent increase in mortality rate with age. If, instead, increased nutrient availability introduces a higher risk of death, then removal of this risk by DR would result in a sustained drop in the elevation of the mortality trajectory relative to that of permanently fully fed individuals. If DR increases life-span solely by reducing the short-term risk of death, then the mortality rates of previously fully fed individuals switched to DR would drop to the same levels as those seen in same-age individuals subjected to DR throughout adulthood. Hence, both hypotheses predict that the onset of DR at any age will increase life-span. Under the damage hypothesis, the mortality trajectory after the onset of DR has a lowered slope, whereas under the risk hypothesis the mortality rate shows a sustained drop in elevation. These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive. To determine the importance of these two mechanisms of life-span extension by DR in Drosophila, nutritional conditions were manipulated and age at death was assessed in 7492 individuals. Age-specific mortality trajectories for female flies subjected to DR from the onset of adulthood showed the characteristic delay in the onset of detectable aging-related mortality, compared to those maintained on full feeding (Fig. 1A). When fully fed flies were switched to DR on days 14 or 22 of adulthood, there was a rapid and complete reduction in age-specific mortality to the levels seen in permanent DR flies (Fig. 1A). Within 48 hours, the mortality of these switched cohorts had declined to the level of flies maintained on DR throughout adult life, and after this point the two mortality trajectories were indistinguishable. Males showed a similar response (Fig. 2A). These results demonstrate that age-specific mortality of the DR flies depends only upon their age and their current nutritional status, with past nutrition having no detectable effect. DR therefore lowered mortality entirely as a consequence of a lower short-term risk of death, and the accumulation of aging-related damage remained unaffected. In reciprocal switches from DR to fully fed conditions, mortality levels showed a rapid (within 48 hours) increase (Fig. 1B). In females, subsequent mortality was reduced in the switched groups compared to mortality of the permanently fully fed flies, and the magnitude of this reduction was greater in the group that was switched later. Long-term DR therefore either impeded the females' ability to respond to full feeding or protected against its increased risk. Males showed no such effect, and subsequent mortality was slightly higher in individuals with a history of DR (Fig. 2B). We performed a similar experiment examining the effect of current and past experimental temperature on mortality in Drosophila. In sharp contrast to the effects of DR, lowered temperature, which also increases life-span in ectotherms (11, 12), reduced the accumulation of aging-related damage. Flies cultured at a lower temperature exhibited a reduction in the slope of the mortality trajectory, rather than a delay in the time when aging-related mortality could first be detected (Fig. 3A), as has been previously reported (13). When flies were switched from 27°C to 18°C environments (Fig. 3A), the increased mortality driven by life at a higher temperature persisted in the switched flies compared to the 18°C control flies. This effect of thermal history was greater the later the age at which the switch was made. After the switch, the subsequent rate of increase in mortality with age reflected the new temperature: It was lower in the switched flies currently at 18°C than in the flies permanently at 27°C. Flies switched from high to low temperature at various adult ages therefore showed slower demographic aging. The reciprocal switch, from 18°C to 27°C (Fig. 3B), produced similar findings: The lower mortality seen in flies at the lower temperature persisted in the switched flies, and to a greater extent the later the switch was made. After the switch, the rate of increase in mortality rate with age rose to become indistinguishable from that seen in flies kept permanently at the high temperature. These results demonstrate that higher temperature increases the rate of aging by inflicting permanent debilitation and that thermal history is a major determinant of mortality. This is in sharp contrast to the effect of DR on mortality, in which there is no memory of past feeding. These findings support the hypothesis that DR in Drosophila extends life-span solely by reducing the short-term risk of death. DR and control flies accumulate irreversible, aging-related damage at the same rate, but the accumulated damage produces a detectable increase in the death rate at later ages in the DR flies. Death occurs when the combined effects of risk and damage are sufficiently great, and a lowering of risk by DR holds the flies below this death threshold for longer, in some support of the set-point model of life-span extension by DR (14). The crucial criterion for determining the roles of reduced risk and damage in the extension of life-span is the response of the mortality trajectory to switches between high- and low-mortality regimes. Although other interventions such as mutations in the insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway have been shown to extend life-span in C. elegans, Drosophila, and mice (15–18), it is not clear if these reduce risk, the rate of accumulation of aging-related damage, or both. DR initiated during middle age in mammals increases subsequent life-span (19, 20), but this result is consistent with either the damage or risk hypothesis. The critical experiments in mammals have yet to be done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.