Guest guest Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Question to Steph > Hi> Read your story, visited your site, read some your messages. Very > useful information. But I need to make my own choice and it's > difficult. I read that dr recommended you Ext Beam Radiation. Was it > because you had something left from your thyroid? <<SB>> - They recommended Ext Beam because I had been given 3 rounds of RAI reaching my max lifetime dose of 500 mCi. My Tg was 24 and it has been down to 12 so it was going back up which means to the allopathic community that the cancer was still there and growing. I never achieved a less than 1 Tg level which is what they require for no treatment with RAI. You wrote me earlier that I should watch Tg. My Tg is less 1. I had metastasas to > 2 lymph nodes, they were removed. And tumor was about 5mm. My thyroid > was also removed. The doctor says I still need RAI. <<SB>> I had thyroid removed and mets to 1 lymph node. After 6 yeare and your Tg less than 1 you are doing great. No RAI is required. I am jealous! The surgery was 6 years ago. I am trying to detoxify my body, but it's difficult to do > it in my country, where after Chernobyl radiation is everywhere, > there are no good docs to help. I added already Potassium Iodide to my > diet. One more question how high is the risk of cancer coming back > without having RAI in my case? <<<SB>>>> That is rough. I would try to get Iodine and Iodide in your diet (Lugols for instance or Iodoral - Breastcancerchoices.org will ship internationally). The risk for you of getting cancer again if you are keeping a clean diet and balancing your hormones and keeping your thyroid levels good is very low. It may be a bit more with the Chernobly issue but I would thing that given the half life of I-131 is 8 days you are pretty clear of any more damage. Adding more RAI will only add more insult to your body. I would eat well, take nutritional supplements and exercise. That's your best bet to keep the cancer at bay. > Thank you! > > > ------------------------------------> > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 I've got 1 more question Did you have problems with your adrenals. What did you take to help them. By the way I had 1 RAI, before this RAI my Tg was 4, after RAI about 0.1. It seems that it helped a bit. > > > Question to Steph > > > > Hi > > Read your story, visited your site, read some your messages. Very > > useful information. But I need to make my own choice and it's > > difficult. I read that dr recommended you Ext Beam Radiation. Was it > > because you had something left from your thyroid? > > > <<SB>> - They recommended Ext Beam because I had been given 3 rounds of RAI reaching my max lifetime dose of 500 mCi. My Tg was 24 and it has been down to 12 so it was going back up which means to the allopathic community that the cancer was still there and growing. I never achieved a less than 1 Tg level which is what they require for no treatment with RAI. > > > You wrote me earlier that I should watch Tg. My Tg is less 1. I had metastasas to > > 2 lymph nodes, they were removed. And tumor was about 5mm. My thyroid > > was also removed. The doctor says I still need RAI. > > <<SB>> I had thyroid removed and mets to 1 lymph node. After 6 yeare and your Tg less than 1 you are doing great. No RAI is required. I am jealous! > > > The surgery was 6 years ago. I am trying to detoxify my body, but it's difficult to do > > it in my country, where after Chernobyl radiation is everywhere, > > there are no good docs to help. I added already Potassium Iodide to my > > diet. One more question how high is the risk of cancer coming back > > without having RAI in my case? > > <<<SB>>>> That is rough. I would try to get Iodine and Iodide in your diet (Lugols for instance or Iodoral - Breastcancerchoices.org will ship internationally). The risk for you of getting cancer again if you are keeping a clean diet and balancing your hormones and keeping your thyroid levels good is very low. It may be a bit more with the Chernobly issue but I would thing that given the half life of I-131 is 8 days you are pretty clear of any more damage. Adding more RAI will only add more insult to your body. I would eat well, take nutritional supplements and exercise. That's your best bet to keep the cancer at bay. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Are you not afraid of cancer coming back? > > > > > > Question to Steph > > > > > > > Hi > > > Read your story, visited your site, read some your messages. Very > > > useful information. But I need to make my own choice and it's > > > difficult. I read that dr recommended you Ext Beam Radiation. Was > it > > > because you had something left from your thyroid? > > > > > > <<SB>> - They recommended Ext Beam because I had been given 3 > rounds of RAI reaching my max lifetime dose of 500 mCi. My Tg was 24 > and it has been down to 12 so it was going back up which means to the > allopathic community that the cancer was still there and growing. I > never achieved a less than 1 Tg level which is what they require for > no treatment with RAI. > > > > > > You wrote me earlier that I should watch Tg. My Tg is less 1. I had > metastasas to > > > 2 lymph nodes, they were removed. And tumor was about 5mm. My > thyroid > > > was also removed. The doctor says I still need RAI. > > > > <<SB>> I had thyroid removed and mets to 1 lymph node. After 6 > yeare and your Tg less than 1 you are doing great. No RAI is > required. I am jealous! > > > > > > The surgery was 6 years ago. I am trying to detoxify my body, but > it's difficult to do > > > it in my country, where after Chernobyl radiation is everywhere, > > > there are no good docs to help. I added already Potassium Iodide > to my > > > diet. One more question how high is the risk of cancer coming > back > > > without having RAI in my case? > > > > <<<SB>>>> That is rough. I would try to get Iodine and Iodide in > your diet (Lugols for instance or Iodoral - Breastcancerchoices.org > will ship internationally). The risk for you of getting cancer again > if you are keeping a clean diet and balancing your hormones and > keeping your thyroid levels good is very low. It may be a bit more > with the Chernobly issue but I would thing that given the half life > of I-131 is 8 days you are pretty clear of any more damage. Adding > more RAI will only add more insult to your body. I would eat well, > take nutritional supplements and exercise. That's your best bet to > keep the cancer at bay. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 So many questions. Here is one more I had panic attacks, palps, sweating and so on, my Doctor told maybe that is because cancer wants to come back. She scared me. So she thinks I need RAI. What do you think about symptoms? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 The key is to strengthen your organs. Make sure they are in tip top shape. Do a liver cleanse and begin taking coffee enemas. Make sure your pancreas, kidneys, adrenals are working well. Panic attacks can be hormonal related even palpitations. Your doctor is totally illiterate when it comes to nutrition for you body to keep cancer under control. phine > > So many questions. Here is one more > I had panic attacks, palps, sweating and so on, my Doctor told maybe > that is because cancer wants to come back. She scared me. So she > thinks I need RAI. What do you think about symptoms? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Yes I did. I have taken Metagenics Serenegan, Biotics Research Cytozyme AD and when I was really bad I added Cortef (rx). It sounds like your first RAI did the trick. I wouldn't do another. Steph Question to Steph >> >> >> > Hi >> > Read your story, visited your site, read some your messages. Very >> > useful information. But I need to make my own choice and it's >> > difficult. I read that dr recommended you Ext Beam Radiation. Was > it >> > because you had something left from your thyroid? >> >> >> <<SB>> - They recommended Ext Beam because I had been given 3 > rounds of RAI reaching my max lifetime dose of 500 mCi. My Tg was 24 > and it has been down to 12 so it was going back up which means to the > allopathic community that the cancer was still there and growing. I > never achieved a less than 1 Tg level which is what they require for > no treatment with RAI. >> >> >> You wrote me earlier that I should watch Tg. My Tg is less 1. I had > metastasas to >> > 2 lymph nodes, they were removed. And tumor was about 5mm. My > thyroid >> > was also removed. The doctor says I still need RAI. >> >> <<SB>> I had thyroid removed and mets to 1 lymph node. After 6 > yeare and your Tg less than 1 you are doing great. No RAI is > required. I am jealous! >> >> >> The surgery was 6 years ago. I am trying to detoxify my body, but > it's difficult to do >> > it in my country, where after Chernobyl radiation is everywhere, >> > there are no good docs to help. I added already Potassium Iodide > to my >> > diet. One more question how high is the risk of cancer coming > back >> > without having RAI in my case? >> >> <<<SB>>>> That is rough. I would try to get Iodine and Iodide in > your diet (Lugols for instance or Iodoral - Breastcancerchoices.org > will ship internationally). The risk for you of getting cancer again > if you are keeping a clean diet and balancing your hormones and > keeping your thyroid levels good is very low. It may be a bit more > with the Chernobly issue but I would thing that given the half life > of I-131 is 8 days you are pretty clear of any more damage. Adding > more RAI will only add more insult to your body. I would eat well, > take nutritional supplements and exercise. That's your best bet to > keep the cancer at bay. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thank you! >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------ >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Everyone who has cancer at one time fears it coming back. But I can't live like that. I will not do more radiation. That is not the reason I got it in the first place. It was an underlying nutritional deficiency, toxicity and a gene defect. I work on those things now. Steph Question to Steph >> > >> > >> > > Hi >> > > Read your story, visited your site, read some your messages. > Very >> > > useful information. But I need to make my own choice and it's >> > > difficult. I read that dr recommended you Ext Beam Radiation. > Was >> it >> > > because you had something left from your thyroid? >> > >> > >> > <<SB>> - They recommended Ext Beam because I had been given 3 >> rounds of RAI reaching my max lifetime dose of 500 mCi. My Tg was > 24 >> and it has been down to 12 so it was going back up which means to > the >> allopathic community that the cancer was still there and growing. > I >> never achieved a less than 1 Tg level which is what they require > for >> no treatment with RAI. >> > >> > >> > You wrote me earlier that I should watch Tg. My Tg is less 1. I > had >> metastasas to >> > > 2 lymph nodes, they were removed. And tumor was about 5mm. My >> thyroid >> > > was also removed. The doctor says I still need RAI. >> > >> > <<SB>> I had thyroid removed and mets to 1 lymph node. After 6 >> yeare and your Tg less than 1 you are doing great. No RAI is >> required. I am jealous! >> > >> > >> > The surgery was 6 years ago. I am trying to detoxify my body, > but >> it's difficult to do >> > > it in my country, where after Chernobyl radiation is > everywhere, >> > > there are no good docs to help. I added already Potassium > Iodide >> to my >> > > diet. One more question how high is the risk of cancer coming >> back >> > > without having RAI in my case? >> > >> > <<<SB>>>> That is rough. I would try to get Iodine and Iodide > in >> your diet (Lugols for instance or Iodoral - Breastcancerchoices.org >> will ship internationally). The risk for you of getting cancer > again >> if you are keeping a clean diet and balancing your hormones and >> keeping your thyroid levels good is very low. It may be a bit more >> with the Chernobly issue but I would thing that given the half life >> of I-131 is 8 days you are pretty clear of any more damage. Adding >> more RAI will only add more insult to your body. I would eat well, >> take nutritional supplements and exercise. That's your best bet to >> keep the cancer at bay. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > Thank you! >> > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------ >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Bunk! It's because your adrenals are fatigued. You need to fire this doctor and get a real one. Sounds like the scar tactics my old Endo used on me. What a line of crap. Steph Re: Question to Steph > So many questions. Here is one more > I had panic attacks, palps, sweating and so on, my Doctor told maybe > that is because cancer wants to come back. She scared me. So she > thinks I need RAI. What do you think about symptoms? > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 What is gene defect? How did you find it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 phine, How do you make sure your liver, pancreas, kidneys and adrenals are working well? Are you referring to doing the cleanses such as dr. schultze's ? Are there cleanses for the adrenals too? What about the lymphatic system, are there cleansers for that? Or are you referring to other methods of keeping these organs in tip top shape? Thanks, Angel Re: Question to Steph Posted by: "jlkinkona" josephine@... jlkinkona Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:58 am (PDT) The key is to strengthen your organs. Make sure they are in tip topshape. Do a liver cleanse and begin taking coffee enemas. Make sureyour pancreas, kidneys, adrenals are working well. Panic attacks canbe hormonal related even palpitations. Your doctor is totallyilliterate when it comes to nutrition for you body to keep cancerunder control. phine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Steph, What do these supplements actually DO for the adrenals? I mean, HOW did it work on helping them? Angel Re: Question to Steph Posted by: "ladybugsandbees" ladybugsandbees@... stephanie_a_buist Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:29 am (PDT) Yes I did. I have taken Metagenics Serenegan, Biotics Research Cytozyme AD and when I was really bad I added Cortef (rx).It sounds like your first RAI did the trick. I wouldn't do another.Steph Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Cancer will come back because it never left. This is a systemic disease that is well established before a tumor forms. The mechanism by which all cancer develops is the same regardless of what name is given to it which is based upon where it is found. There are basically only two types, carcinoma and sarcoma. Carcinoma makes up about 90% of all cancers. Sarcoma about 5% and the other few like hodgkins/leukemia etc. The trigger that causes a cell to begin to malfunction is not so much based upon its internal make-up but rather the environment in which it is living. In a healthy body the blood and lymph is relatively free of protein debris, the oxygen levels and transport mechanisms are functioning normally and the most important aspect of all is that the fluids flow free through the tissue capillaries. It is in the capillaries where the trouble begins. When the utility services to the cell become impaired, ie., blood flow becomes sluggish, certain nutrients are in short supply or missing altogether and foreign proteins escape the digestive system and enter the fluid matrix partially digested, the fluids aka humors become contaminated with what is essentially trash. The waste material from cellular metabolism lingers instead of being carried away by the lymph system and oxygen levels begin to drop. In essence, the cells begin to choke. When cells can no no longer breath properly due to lower oxygen absorption, a state known as hypoxia exists. As a survival mechanism, the cells that are not too old will not die but will change their method of energy production. They will use far less oxygen for internal combustion and will begin to burn more sugar. A fermentation process develops and the cells begin to exhaust carbon monoxide and a lot of lactic acid which further pollutes the humors. The body responds to this dangerous situation by constructing a containment vessel. It will use the same mechanism that is used to build a placenta. A tumor thus forms to contain the now dying and dead tissues so that they do not circulate throughout the body causing more trouble. Removing the tumor does not address the cause of the problem. Killing cancer cells with radiation or toxic chemicals cannot kill all of them but can only reduce their numbers. They will come back and if the tumor has been removed, the cancer, when it returns as it always does, will return with a vengeance. The second time around, conventional treatments seldom work. The good news is, however, that the cause of the problem can be addressed and placed under control by making drastic changes in the diet and personal hygiene. By cleaning up the body fluids by fixing the digestive system, the conditions under which the cancer formed can be corrected and the cancer will not return. All of the correct treatments for cancer that are used outside the U.S. target the cause of the disease. People are taught how to live, how to eat, how to exercise, etc. When they live their lives according to the laws of Nature, the cancer seldom returns. We don't " catch " cancer, we produce the fertile environment in which it can thrive. The flies are not responsible for the swamp. Clean up the swamp and the flies go away and so it is with cancer: A disease of civilization. > > Everyone who has cancer at one time fears it coming back. But I can't live > like that. I will not do more radiation. That is not the reason I got it > in the first place. It was an underlying nutritional deficiency, toxicity > and a gene defect. I work on those things now. > > Steph > > > SNIP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 My cancer markers were basically non-existent after my surgery. My cancer was a single, self-contained nodule. It left. I do believe that I am iodine deficient, so more cells in my body could eventually become cancerous--and that's why I'm here now. While I agree with some of your premise, it is not helpful to those of us living with a diagnosis of cancer--and especially those who are afraid--to read this opinion. It doesn't bother me now, but last year this email would have sent me into a panic of fear. You really need to be aware that saying scary things to a cancer patient may seem prudent to you, but it can be very cruel to the reader. ----- Original Message ----- > Cancer will come back because it never left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 We tested for it - MTHFR - Methylene Tetra Hydro Folate Reductase - google it and you will find the MTHFR gene defect. Steph Re: Question to Steph > What is gene defect? How did you find it? > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Cytozyme AD is a Neonatal Bovine Adrenal Glandular so it replaces some of the adrenal function. The Serenegan is a Chinese herbal remedy I don't know how herbs work. Steph Re: Question to Steph Steph, What do these supplements actually DO for the adrenals? I mean, HOW did it work on helping them? Angel Re: Question to Steph Posted by: "ladybugsandbees" ladybugsandbees@... stephanie_a_buist Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:29 am (PDT) Yes I did. I have taken Metagenics Serenegan, Biotics Research Cytozyme AD and when I was really bad I added Cortef (rx).It sounds like your first RAI did the trick. I wouldn't do another.Steph Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 The process by which cancer develops begins with a single tumor; seldom is there more than one. The reason for this is due to a rare sugar that the cancer uses and there is too little of it in the beginning stages to feed more than one tumor. The tumor uses this sugar known as beta glucosidase act as a cabalist for sugar combustion from which the mitochondria of the cancer cell derives much of its energy. When a tumor is removed completely, however, the sugar is then in sufficient supply to support multiple tumors and it is for this reason that a tumor should never be completely removed. If the tumor gets too large or it begins to interfere with organ function or humor flow, it should be debulked but not removed in toto. Leaving margins in will cause the tumor growth to remain in its original location so that the owner can gauge his/her progress in reducing it with digestive enzymes. Lymph nodes should never be removed. They swell because they are doing their job. The largest lymph node in the body is the tonsil. It took years for the 'profession' to come to realize that it was swollen for a reason and was not a source for infection but is a containment vessel to prevent the spread of infection. Rarely is it removed today. > > My cancer markers were basically non-existent after my surgery. My cancer > was a single, self-contained nodule. It left. I do believe that I am > iodine deficient, so more cells in my body could eventually become > cancerous--and that's why I'm here now. > > While I agree with some of your premise, it is not helpful to those of us > living with a diagnosis of cancer--and especially those who are afraid--to > read this opinion. It doesn't bother me now, but last year this email would > have sent me into a panic of fear. You really need to be aware that saying > scary things to a cancer patient may seem prudent to you, but it can be very > cruel to the reader. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > Cancer will come back because it never left. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 That's your opinion. I had raging hashis that was never treated, so therefore, I developed cancer. It's pretty simple to understand. I had thyroid cancer. What kind did you have? ----- Original Message ----- > The process by which cancer develops begins with a single tumor; > seldom is there more than one. The reason for this is due to a rare > sugar that the cancer uses and there is too little of it in the > beginning stages to feed more than one tumor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Comdyne: I am not trying to sound disrespectful, but can you please list your sources for finding this info. Did you go through any cancer personally? There is genetic cancer in my family, so I am always trying to gain more information. How does the genetic factor play into this theory? Thanks, From: comdyne2002 <comdyne@...>Subject: Re: Question to Stephiodine Date: Friday, July 11, 2008, 10:04 AM The process by which cancer develops begins with a single tumor; seldom is there more than one. The reason for this is due to a rare sugar that the cancer uses and there is too little of it in the beginning stages to feed more than one tumor. The tumor uses this sugar known as beta glucosidase act as a cabalist for sugar combustion from which the mitochondria of the cancer cell derives much of its energy. When a tumor is removed completely, however, the sugar is then in sufficient supply to support multiple tumors and it is for this reason that a tumor should never be completely removed. If the tumor gets too large or it begins to interfere with organ function or humor flow, it should be debulked but not removed in toto. Leaving margins in will cause the tumor growth to remain in its original location so that the owner can gauge his/her progress in reducing it with digestive enzymes. Lymph nodes should never be removed. They swell because they are doing their job. The largest lymph node in the body is the tonsil. It took years for the 'profession' to come to realize that it was swollen for a reason and was not a source for infection but is a containment vessel to prevent the spread of infection. Rarely is it removed today. >> My cancer markers were basically non-existent after my surgery. My cancer > was a single, self-contained nodule. It left. I do believe that I am > iodine deficient, so more cells in my body could eventually become > cancerous--and that's why I'm here now.> > While I agree with some of your premise, it is not helpful to those of us > living with a diagnosis of cancer--and especially those who are afraid--to > read this opinion. It doesn't bother me now, but last year this email would > have sent me into a panic of fear. You really need to be aware that saying > scary things to a cancer patient may seem prudent to you, but it can be very > cruel to the reader.> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > Cancer will come back because it never left.> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Hi Janie ~ I thought I should add to my post: my tests showed high antibodies to casein. I can eat whey protein ~ and do in my morning protein shakes made with a non-denatured whey protein concentrate from grass-fed cows called Whey Cool by Designs for Health. ~ p.s. Apoligies to Steph as this is getting quite off-topic for iodine. +++++ Hi Janie ~ Nope ~ can't tolerate raw cow's milk either. You are right: most people can drink raw cow's milk ~ and that it is one of the most healthy foods on the planet. My kids do fine with it, but not me. I'm a big Nourishing Traditions/WAPrice/Sally Fallon fan ~ and follow as much of their advice as I can. ~ -----Original Message----- Perhaps the reason you are able to tolerate the goat and sheep dairy is because it is raw? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 That is all very true, but cancer cells are present in everyone, not just cancer patients. The healthy body can eliminate them, the unhealthy body does not. The point is to get your body and especially your immune system healthy so it will not provide the conditions cancers needs to grow. That is why it is so incomprehensible to me that radiation, chemo, and surgery which impair or destroy the immune system is so acceptable to the medical/drug treatment systems. They must have forgotten how to think as well as how to actually look at the patient. Dorothy .......You really need to be aware that saying > scary things to a cancer patient may seem prudent to you, but it can be very > cruel to the reader. > > > > > Cancer will come back because it never left. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Are you still taking the Cytozyme AD?PamelaFrom: ladybugsandbees <ladybugsandbees@...>Subject: Re: Re: Question to Stephiodine Date: Friday, July 11, 2008, 6:56 AM Cytozyme AD is a Neonatal Bovine Adrenal Glandular so it replaces some of the adrenal function. The Serenegan is a Chinese herbal remedy I don't know how herbs work. Steph Re: Question to Steph Steph, What do these supplements actually DO for the adrenals? I mean, HOW did it work on helping them? Angel Re: Question to Steph Posted by: "ladybugsandbees" ladybugsandbees@ sbcglobal. net stephanie_a_ buist Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:29 am (PDT) Yes I did. I have taken Metagenics Serenegan, Biotics Research Cytozyme AD and when I was really bad I added Cortef (rx).It sounds like your first RAI did the trick. I wouldn't do another.Steph Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 No my adrenals are fine now. I stopped late last year sometime. Re: Question to Steph Steph, What do these supplements actually DO for the adrenals? I mean, HOW did it work on helping them? Angel Re: Question to Steph Posted by: "ladybugsandbees" ladybugsandbees@ sbcglobal. net stephanie_a_ buist Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:29 am (PDT) Yes I did. I have taken Metagenics Serenegan, Biotics Research Cytozyme AD and when I was really bad I added Cortef (rx).It sounds like your first RAI did the trick. I wouldn't do another.Steph Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Do you have a source for this assertion? ----- Original Message ----- > That is all very true, but cancer cells are present in everyone, not > just cancer patients. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 It's true . I have read it in my studies. There aren't many and they are not forming into masses (tumors) or growing out of control as we think of cancer. Cancer cells are just mutated DNA cells but most of us have immune systems that kill these off when they are detected. Guess what is used / required in the process needed to make them die off? IODINE! The P35 process determines what is damaged and what needs to die. P53 needs iodine. Steph Re: Re: Question to Steph > Do you have a source for this assertion? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > >> That is all very true, but cancer cells are present in everyone, not >> just cancer patients. > > ------------------------------------ > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2008 Report Share Posted July 11, 2008 Just one of many references that came up when I Googled " immunity to cancer " . http://thyroid.about.com/library/immune/blimm27.htm Dorothy > Do you have a source for this assertion? > > > > That is all very true, but cancer cells are present in everyone, not > > just cancer patients. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.