Guest guest Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 http://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/314/7088/1175#5429 ......and not forgetting the fraud that has gone with this problem Bob > Hi Sheila,> Been a while since I visited the forum- sorry! I'm off to see the GP> tomorrow; they have "called me in" to discuss my recent high cholesterol> blood test results. As I am still being told that I am not hypothyroid> (despite my TSH being over 2 for the last 3 years, up to 3.9 in January Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 Hi - yes, I am very aware of this article and wish he still believed and practiced this. He probably does still believe it, but he appears to be in the hands of his masters (big pharma) so was required to do an about turn, in the same way that Toft also did - both past Presidents of the BTA ;o( Luv - Sheila I came across an article written my Prof. Weetman in the BMJ in 1997 that discusses various aspects of HypoT, screening and cost implications. What prompted me to post on the forum was two statements in the article: " anyone with a TSH level over 2 has an increased risk of Hypothyroidism " and " Thyroid stimulating hormone concentrations above 2 mU/l reflect a disturbance of the thyroid-pituitary axis " . I was rather surprised to read this given Weetman's tendency to diagnose " somatoform disorders " for anyone whose TSH is not over 5.5?! I wondered if you were aware of this article and if you had any comment to make!? Or perhaps I have misinterpreted something along the way? I'm guessing his opinions have changed over the last 11 years? Anyway, here's the link if you fancy a read: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/314/7088/1175 _,_._,___ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.