Guest guest Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 Avril, You are dead on, there's large group of people on here who believe exactly that. Further think what's going to happen when our children outlive us, who's going to pick up their care then.. > Every once and a while you hear about the cost effectiveness of vaccines > and how they keep people from missing work after catching the 'flu and keep > parents from missing work taking care of sick kids who are forced to lose > time from school for illnesses such as chicken pox. > > It seems to me that the vaccine industry and government will never be able > to admit the vaccine-ASD connection because of the high costs of taking > care of autism and their learning related disorders. Furthermore, in light > of autism and other chronic auto-immune diseases such as asthma and > alzheimers, vaccines would never be seen as cost effective again. The > whole industry would be dead in the water. > > Is this a dumb argument to make? That the real cost of vaccines powerfully > outweighs any value vaccines could render at all? And if the connection > were proven, vaccines will never be a justified public program again? > > Is that why they need to lie so much? It isn't just our trust in vaccines > that would be shaken, but the whole rational for vaccines would head out > the window? > > Just wondering out loud, > > Avril Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2005 Report Share Posted July 29, 2005 And to admit to the fact that they knowingly poisoned our children would mean that they would have to take responsibility for their actions. Since they are already known for mandating programs they can't (or, sometimes refulse to) fund, it's obvious that could never happen. Just adding my two cents. Debra > > From: " McCarthy " <john-mccarthy@...> > Date: 2005/07/29 Fri AM 09:32:20 EDT > EOHarm > Subject: Re: Cost effectiveness > Avril, You are dead on, there's large group of people on here who believe exactly that. Further think what's going to happen when our children outlive us, who's going to pick up their care then.. > Avril, You are dead on, there's large group of people on here who believe exactly that. Further think what's going to happen when our children outlive us, who's going to pick up their care then.. > Every once and a while you hear about the cost effectiveness of vaccines > and how they keep people from missing work after catching the 'flu and keep > parents from missing work taking care of sick kids who are forced to lose > time from school for illnesses such as chicken pox. > > It seems to me that the vaccine industry and government will never be able > to admit the vaccine-ASD connection because of the high costs of taking > care of autism and their learning related disorders. Furthermore, in light > of autism and other chronic auto-immune diseases such as asthma and > alzheimers, vaccines would never be seen as cost effective again. The > whole industry would be dead in the water. > > Is this a dumb argument to make? That the real cost of vaccines powerfully > outweighs any value vaccines could render at all? And if the connection > were proven, vaccines will never be a justified public program again? > > Is that why they need to lie so much? It isn't just our trust in vaccines > that would be shaken, but the whole rational for vaccines would head out > the window? > > Just wondering out loud, > > Avril Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2011 Report Share Posted March 4, 2011 Yes, Lugols is more cost effective than Iodoral. I think it may depend on how the Lugols is consumed for the teeth staining, straight versus mixed with something. Linn > > I've been reading and surmise that Lugol's is the least expensive way to treat ourselves with iodine. Is this correct? because I find that Iodoral is quite costly comparatively, but much easier of course. If recent posts are accurate can I assume there is no need to worry over stained teeth if I mix with water? I did get some 2.2% from that listed ebay seller, that was a great source and they were very fast to ship. Many thanks! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2011 Report Share Posted March 4, 2011 HiI buy Lugol's ....never bought the more expensive Iodoral....But Iodoral has advantage that it is an exact measured dose of X milligrams of iodine in each pillSome people don't feel right unless they know the exact amount they take each time Plus with Lugol's how big is that drop coming out? Obviously larger drop size means more iodine being consumedBecause drop size when the eyedropper is held at a slant is larger than if eyedropper is held perfectly vertical while squeezing out the iodine. GarrOn Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:21 PM, convictuz <convictuz@...> wrote: I've been reading and surmise that Lugol's is the least expensive way to treat ourselves with iodine. Is this correct? because I find that Iodoral is quite costly comparatively, but much easier of course. If recent posts are accurate can I assume there is no need to worry over stained teeth if I mix with water? I did get some 2.2% from that listed ebay seller, that was a great source and they were very fast to ship. Many thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2011 Report Share Posted March 4, 2011 In addition to those reasons, some people begin to get a stomach upset with larger doses (or even smaller ones) of Lugol's liquid. Iodoral circumvents this problem entirely because the tablets are coated and don't release the iodine until it gets well down into the small intestine. -- At 04:04 PM 3/4/2011, you wrote: >Hi >I buy Lugol's ....never bought the more expensive Iodoral.... > >But Iodoral has advantage that it is an exact measured dose of X >milligrams of iodine in each pill >Some people don't feel right unless they know the exact amount they take >each time > >Plus with Lugol's how big is that drop coming out? Obviously larger drop >size means more iodine being consumed >Because drop size when the eyedropper is held at a slant is larger than if >eyedropper is held perfectly vertical while squeezing out the iodine. > >Garr > > > > > > >On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:21 PM, convictuz ><<mailto:convictuz@...>convictuz@...> wrote: > > >I've been reading and surmise that Lugol's is the least expensive way to >treat ourselves with iodine. Is this correct? because I find that Iodoral >is quite costly comparatively, but much easier of course. If recent posts >are accurate can I assume there is no need to worry over stained teeth if >I mix with water? I did get some 2.2% from that listed ebay seller, that >was a great source and they were very fast to ship. Many thanks! > > > > > ~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~ --A.J. Muste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 4, 2011 Report Share Posted March 4, 2011 If you want to be really cost effective you can make it yourself with 's recipe. I just did my own last night for the first time. Extremely easy and you can make soooo much for so little! From: Baker <vbaker@...>iodine Sent: Fri, March 4, 2011 7:44:44 PMSubject: Re: Cost effectiveness In addition to those reasons, some people begin to get a stomach upset with larger doses (or even smaller ones) of Lugol's liquid. Iodoral circumvents this problem entirely because the tablets are coated and don't release the iodine until it gets well down into the small intestine.--At 04:04 PM 3/4/2011, you wrote:>Hi>I buy Lugol's ....never bought the more expensive Iodoral....>>But Iodoral has advantage that it is an exact measured dose of X >milligrams of iodine in each pill>Some people don't feel right unless they know the exact amount they take >each time>>Plus with Lugol's how big is that drop coming out? Obviously larger drop >size means more iodine being consumed>Because drop size when the eyedropper is held at a slant is larger than if >eyedropper is held perfectly vertical while squeezing out the iodine.>>Garr>>>>>>>On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:21 PM, convictuz ><<mailto:convictuz@...>convictuz@...> wrote:>>>I've been reading and surmise that Lugol's is the least expensive way to >treat ourselves with iodine. Is this correct? because I find that Iodoral >is quite costly comparatively, but much easier of course. If recent posts >are accurate can I assume there is no need to worry over stained teeth if >I mix with water? I did get some 2.2% from that listed ebay seller, that >was a great source and they were very fast to ship. Many thanks! >>>>>~~~ There is no way to peace; peace is the way ~~~~--A.J. Muste Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2011 Report Share Posted March 5, 2011 File this one under " Sisters are doing it for themselves " Well, at least you and Ms. V are (Lugol's)garr On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Shepheard <amandashepheard@...> wrote: If you want to be really cost effective you can make it yourself with 's recipe. I just did my own last night for the first time. Extremely easy and you can make soooo much for so little! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.