Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Iodine vs. MMS

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

From time to time here, I have read people comment that they have used MMS

(magical mineral supplement) for chelation. This always concerned me as MMS is

basically clorine and I feel that clorine exposure was a major cause of my

breast cancer. I have been following the iodine protocol for over 2 years now,

in hopes to chelate the chlorine.

Dr. Marc Sircus just posted an article about MMS, and how he feels it is

dangerous, so I thought it would be good for others to read his article before

using MMS and think about iodine only:

http://blog.imva.info/medicine/magical-mineral-supplement-mms-2

He does recommend iodine instead of MMS for chelation, but I think he is more a

proponent of Nascent as opposed to lugols or iodoral, that most of us use.

I know Dr. Sircus can say some crazy things at times, but I thought this was

information that people should be aware of.

Eve, preventcanswers.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...