Guest guest Posted December 20, 2007 Report Share Posted December 20, 2007 Rogene- I will make sure to give Natasha your email address. Love, Krista > > Krista, > > Would you give Natasha my email addy . . . > > Kerry told her to talk to me . . . we're going to be traveling . .. but we'll have a laptop with us. > > Thanks, > > Rogene > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 Hi Everyone, I was amazed that the New York Times could print such a ridiculous article, I hope this was factual and pertinent ty Debora Dear Editor, I am shocked that Steinhauer's article " Public Health Risk Seen as Parents Reject Vaccines " was allowed to slant viewpoints endorsing vaccines in California, I find that all that Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has done to stop mercury in vaccines and dental amalgams has been for a loss. Mercury is Mercury, whether it be 50% in dental amalgams or at 0.1% dilution , the result is still the same, harm is directly attributed for heavy metal toxicity, look at the rise of 1 in 110 have Autism in the USA or the rise in asthma, allergies, neurological disorders (too many to name), early heart disease, strokes, alzheimers, rise on cancer. What neglected to mention was the articles written in the millions on mercury toxicity from dental amalgams and vaccines that are on the internet, for your info mercury in vaccines is called "thimerosol" and it is in eye drops, contact lense solutions, eye drops, nose drops , ear drops, most cosmetics, in prescriptions drugs (presently manufactured in china now) to name a few. I am one of millions in the US that was poisoned , it took me 2 years of government standard chelation to remove mercury from my body, my reading was 14 ppb the average American is between 1-2ppb , Iwas informed i could have died. One point I can say , I am aboard certified Medical Technologist in Microbiolgy and Chemistry (ASCP). I suggest that everyone look at the minute amounts of mercury are considered poisoned, and also to mention that mercury poisoning is much more dangerous than lead poisoning. The Roman Empire was destroyed through lead poisoning, does that mean the US Empire will be destroyed from mercury? Most of the diseases that vaccines are for all those diseases have been eradicated, I never suffered from measles, and was in excellent health, til i had adentist remove all my white fillings in exchange for silver (mercury ) amalgams. )And yes I did have measles and ckickenpox). What really amazes me they have new names for diseases, meningitis is in fact polio. One other fact to keep in mind all vaccines are innoculated and imbedded with viruses, and in fact cells from aborted fetuses. It's sad that the Vatican stands behind vaccines , and are too ignorant to know the vaccines use aborted fetus tissue. I suggest everyone read what really was added to the polio vaccines that included SV40 the simian virus that probably jumped in some vaccines in 3rd world countries to HIV. '' please research this and then question why the AMA, the AAP and the FDA let's not forget BIG PHARMA (all now MNCs). Quite simple lawsuits, and doctors are too stupid to question it. All of that would explain why the USA is 43rd behind most of Europe, Canada, Australia and other developed nations according to WHO (world health organization). TY for your time. Debora Tyler new york times article Dear Prove Members, The New York Times has published an article entitled “Public Health Risk Seen as Parents Reject Vaccines” (posted below and online at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/us/21vaccine.html?hp ) that deserves a strong response from our members. Please read this article and send letters to the editor and post comments on the website letting the New York Times know what you think. Please point out some of the numerous mistakes and glaring bias. You may even want to post your responses on the various blogs and email lists you are on encouraging others to do the same. In this article, the New York Times’ has demonstrated callous disregard for the families devastated by vaccine reactions, and their willingness to act as accomplices to propagate the ignorant and inhumane agenda of vaccine zealots who REFUSE to acknowledge the countless studies demonstrating vaccine risks is unacceptable in this country. Employees at New York Times not involved in the writing and editing should be embarrassed and ashamed of their colleagues for this article. Intelligent and highly educated parents across the country are questioning vaccines in increasing numbers because they have observed for themselves the FLAWS and the HOLES in the science used to hold up unreasonable and sometimes dangerous one-size-fits-all vaccine mandates and they have seen for themselves previously healthy children destroyed by vaccine reactions while top public health officials categorically deny any association. The public health infrastructure is built on the flawed premise that parents who are educated consumers and question vaccines are somehow responsible for the failure of a drug to perform as promised or advertised. Vaccines are drugs that have the ability to cause injury and death in some people period. NO amount of glorification will change that fact. When you click on the link to the article http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/us/21vaccine.html?hp you can post comments responding to the article online. Additionally, information on sending letters to the editor can be found at http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/lettertoeditor.html and letters can be sent to lettersnytimes. Some of you may want to refer to their self-proclaimed ethical policies namely in section A1 - Our Duty to Our Audience, item number 17 which states “As journalists we treat our readers, viewers, listeners and online users as fairly and openly as possible. Whatever the medium, we tell our audiences the complete, unvarnished truth as best we can learn it.” More on their ethical policies can be found at http://www.nytco.com/press/ethics.html#A1. The media has an ethical obligation to tell people the truth. Parents aren’t wrong to question vaccines just because some people don’t like it. Sincerely, Dawn http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/us/21vaccine.html?hp March 21, 2008 Public Health Risk Seen as Parents Reject Vaccines By JENNIFER STEINHAUER SAN DIEGO — In a highly unusual outbreak of measles here last month, 12 children fell ill; nine of them had not been inoculated against the virus because their parents objected, and the other three were too young to receive vaccines. The parents who objected to their children being inoculated are among a small but growing number of vaccine skeptics in California and other states who take advantage of exemptions to laws requiring vaccinations for school-age children. The exemptions have been growing since the early 1990s at a rate that many epidemiologists, public health officials and physicians find disturbing. Children who are not vaccinated are unnecessarily susceptible to serious illnesses, they say, but also present a danger to children who have had their shots — the measles vaccine, for instance, is only 95 percent effective — and to those children too young to receive certain vaccines. Measles, almost wholly eradicated in the United States through vaccines, can cause pneumonia and brain swelling, which in rare cases can lead to death. The measles outbreak here alarmed public health officials, sickened babies and sent one child to the hospital. Every state allows medical exemptions, and most permit exemptions based on religious practices. But an increasing number of the vaccine skeptics belong to a different group — those who object to the inoculations because of their personal beliefs, often related to an unproven notion that vaccines are linked to autism and other disorders. Twenty states, including California, Ohio and Texas, allow some kind of personal exemption, according to a tally by the s Hopkins University. “I refuse to sacrifice my children for the greater good,” said Sybil Carlson, whose 6-year-old son goes to school with several of the children hit by the measles outbreak here. The boy is immunized against some diseases but not measles, Ms. Carlson said, while his 3-year-old brother has had just one shot, protecting him against meningitis. “When I began to read about vaccines and how they work,” she said, “I saw medical studies, not given to use by the mainstream media, connecting them with neurological disorders, asthma and immunology.” Ms. Carlson said she understood what was at stake. “I cannot deny that my child can put someone else at risk,” she said. In 1991, less than 1 percent of children in the states with personal-belief exemptions went without vaccines based on the exemption; by 2004, the most recent year for which data are available, the percentage had increased to 2.54 percent, said Saad B. Omer, an assistant scientist at the s Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. While nationwide over 90 percent of children old enough to receive vaccines get them, the number of exemptions worries many health officials and experts. They say that vaccines have saved countless lives, and that personal-belief exemptions are potentially dangerous and bad public policy because they are not based on sound science. “If you have clusters of exemptions, you increase the risk of exposing everyone in the community,” said Dr. Omer, who has extensively studied disease outbreaks and vaccines. It is the absence, or close to it, of some illnesses in the United States that keep some parents from opting for the shots. Worldwide, 242,000 children a year die from measles, but it used to be near one million. The deaths have dropped because of vaccination, a 68 percent decrease from 2000 to 2006. “The very success of immunizations has turned out to be an Achilles’ heel,” said Dr. Mark Sawyer, a pediatrician and infectious disease specialist at Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego. “Most of these parents have never seen measles, and don’t realize it could be a bad disease so they turn their concerns to unfounded risks. They do not perceive risk of the disease but perceive risk of the vaccine.” Dr. Sawyer and the vast majority of pediatricians believe strongly that vaccinations are the cornerstone of sound public health. Many doctors view the so-called exempters as parasites, of a sort, benefiting from the otherwise inoculated majority. Most children get immunized to measles from a combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, a live virus. While the picture of an unvaccinated child was once that of the offspring of poor and uneducated parents, “exempters” are often well educated and financially stable, and hold a host of like-minded child-rearing beliefs. Vaccine skeptics provide differing explanations for their belief that vaccines may cause various illnesses and disorders, including autism. Recent news that a federal vaccine court agreed to pay the family of an autistic child in Georgia who had an underlying mitochondrial disorder has led some skeptics to speculate that vaccines may worsen such conditions. Again, researchers say there is no evidence to support this thesis. andra , director of the Epidemiology of U.S. Immunization Law project at Washington University, said many of these parents are influenced by misinformation obtained from Web sites that oppose vaccination. “The autism debate has convinced these parents to refuse vaccines to the detriment of their own children as well as the community,” Ms. said. While many parents meet deep resistance and even hostility from pediatricians when they choose to delay, space or reject vaccines, they are often able to find doctors who support their choice. “I do think vaccines help with the public health and helping prevent the occasional fatality,” said Dr. Bob Sears, the son of the well-known child-care author by the same name, who practices pediatrics in San Clemente. Roughly 20 percent of his patients do not vaccinate, Dr. Sears said, and another 20 percent partially vaccinate. “I don’t think it is such a critical public health issue that we should force parents into it,” Dr. Sears said. “I don’t lecture the parents or try to change their mind; if they flat out tell me they understand the risks I feel that I should be very respectful of their decision.” Some parents of unvaccinated children go to great lengths to expose their children to childhood diseases to help them build natural immunities. In the wake of last month’s outbreak, Palmer considered sending her son to a measles party to contract the virus. Several years ago, the boy, now 12, contracted chicken pox when Ms. Palmer had him attend a gathering of children with that virus. “It is a very common thing in the natural-health oriented world,” Ms. Palmer said of the parties. She ultimately decided against the measles party for fear of having her son ostracized if he became ill. In the late 1960s and 1970s, measles outbreaks in Alaska and California triggered strong enforcement of vaccine mandates by states, and exemption laws followed. While the laws vary from state to state, most allow children to attend school if their parents agree to keep them home during any outbreak of illnesses prevented by vaccines. The easier it is to get an exemption — some states require barely any paperwork — the more people opt for them, according to Dr. Omer’s research, supported by other vaccine experts. There are differences within states, too. There tend to be geographic clusters of “exempters” in certain counties or even neighborhoods or schools. According to a 2006 article in The Journal of The American Medical Association, exemption rates of 15 percent to 18 percent have been found in Ashland, Ore., and Vashon, Wash. In California, where the statewide rate is about 1.5 percent, some counties were as high as 10 percent to 19 percent of kindergartners. In the San Diego measles outbreak, four of the cases, including the first one, came from a single charter school, and 17 children stayed home during the outbreak to avoid contracting the illness. There is substantial evidence that communities with pools of unvaccinated clusters risk infecting a broad community that includes people who have been inoculated. For instance, in a 2006 mumps outbreak in Iowa that infected 219 people, the majority of those sickened had been vaccinated. In a 2005 measles outbreak in Indiana, there were 34 cases, including six people who had been vaccinated. Here in California, six pertussis outbreaks infected 24 people in 2007; only 2 of 24 were documented as having been appropriately immunized. A surveillance program in the mid ’90s in Canada of infants and preschoolers found that cases of Hib fell to between 8 and 10 cases a year from 550 a year after a vaccine program was begun, and roughly half of those cases were among children whose vaccine failed. Gardiner contributed reporting from Washington. PROVE provides information on vaccines, and immunization policies and practices that affect the children and adults of Texas. Our mission is to prevent vaccine injury and death and to promote and protect the right of every person to make informed independent vaccination decisions for themselves and their family. This information is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. Contact Information provevaccineinfo (DOT) net (email) http://vaccineinfo.net/ (web site) Subscribe to PROVE Email Updates: http://vaccineinfo.net/subscribe.htmTell a Friend about PROVE: http://vaccineinfo.net/subscribe/friends.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 Hi Everyone, I was amazed that the New York Times could print such a ridiculous article, I hope this was factual and pertinent ty Debora Dear Editor, I am shocked that Steinhauer's article " Public Health Risk Seen as Parents Reject Vaccines " was allowed to slant viewpoints endorsing vaccines in California, I find that all that Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has done to stop mercury in vaccines and dental amalgams has been for a loss. Mercury is Mercury, whether it be 50% in dental amalgams or at 0.1% dilution , the result is still the same, harm is directly attributed for heavy metal toxicity, look at the rise of 1 in 110 have Autism in the USA or the rise in asthma, allergies, neurological disorders (too many to name), early heart disease, strokes, alzheimers, rise on cancer. What neglected to mention was the articles written in the millions on mercury toxicity from dental amalgams and vaccines that are on the internet, for your info mercury in vaccines is called "thimerosol" and it is in eye drops, contact lense solutions, eye drops, nose drops , ear drops, most cosmetics, in prescriptions drugs (presently manufactured in china now) to name a few. I am one of millions in the US that was poisoned , it took me 2 years of government standard chelation to remove mercury from my body, my reading was 14 ppb the average American is between 1-2ppb , Iwas informed i could have died. One point I can say , I am aboard certified Medical Technologist in Microbiolgy and Chemistry (ASCP). I suggest that everyone look at the minute amounts of mercury are considered poisoned, and also to mention that mercury poisoning is much more dangerous than lead poisoning. The Roman Empire was destroyed through lead poisoning, does that mean the US Empire will be destroyed from mercury? Most of the diseases that vaccines are for all those diseases have been eradicated, I never suffered from measles, and was in excellent health, til i had adentist remove all my white fillings in exchange for silver (mercury ) amalgams. )And yes I did have measles and ckickenpox). What really amazes me they have new names for diseases, meningitis is in fact polio. One other fact to keep in mind all vaccines are innoculated and imbedded with viruses, and in fact cells from aborted fetuses. It's sad that the Vatican stands behind vaccines , and are too ignorant to know the vaccines use aborted fetus tissue. I suggest everyone read what really was added to the polio vaccines that included SV40 the simian virus that probably jumped in some vaccines in 3rd world countries to HIV. '' please research this and then question why the AMA, the AAP and the FDA let's not forget BIG PHARMA (all now MNCs). Quite simple lawsuits, and doctors are too stupid to question it. All of that would explain why the USA is 43rd behind most of Europe, Canada, Australia and other developed nations according to WHO (world health organization). TY for your time. Debora Tyler new york times article Dear Prove Members, The New York Times has published an article entitled “Public Health Risk Seen as Parents Reject Vaccines” (posted below and online at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/us/21vaccine.html?hp ) that deserves a strong response from our members. Please read this article and send letters to the editor and post comments on the website letting the New York Times know what you think. Please point out some of the numerous mistakes and glaring bias. You may even want to post your responses on the various blogs and email lists you are on encouraging others to do the same. In this article, the New York Times’ has demonstrated callous disregard for the families devastated by vaccine reactions, and their willingness to act as accomplices to propagate the ignorant and inhumane agenda of vaccine zealots who REFUSE to acknowledge the countless studies demonstrating vaccine risks is unacceptable in this country. Employees at New York Times not involved in the writing and editing should be embarrassed and ashamed of their colleagues for this article. Intelligent and highly educated parents across the country are questioning vaccines in increasing numbers because they have observed for themselves the FLAWS and the HOLES in the science used to hold up unreasonable and sometimes dangerous one-size-fits-all vaccine mandates and they have seen for themselves previously healthy children destroyed by vaccine reactions while top public health officials categorically deny any association. The public health infrastructure is built on the flawed premise that parents who are educated consumers and question vaccines are somehow responsible for the failure of a drug to perform as promised or advertised. Vaccines are drugs that have the ability to cause injury and death in some people period. NO amount of glorification will change that fact. When you click on the link to the article http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/us/21vaccine.html?hp you can post comments responding to the article online. Additionally, information on sending letters to the editor can be found at http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/lettertoeditor.html and letters can be sent to lettersnytimes. Some of you may want to refer to their self-proclaimed ethical policies namely in section A1 - Our Duty to Our Audience, item number 17 which states “As journalists we treat our readers, viewers, listeners and online users as fairly and openly as possible. Whatever the medium, we tell our audiences the complete, unvarnished truth as best we can learn it.” More on their ethical policies can be found at http://www.nytco.com/press/ethics.html#A1. The media has an ethical obligation to tell people the truth. Parents aren’t wrong to question vaccines just because some people don’t like it. Sincerely, Dawn http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/us/21vaccine.html?hp March 21, 2008 Public Health Risk Seen as Parents Reject Vaccines By JENNIFER STEINHAUER SAN DIEGO — In a highly unusual outbreak of measles here last month, 12 children fell ill; nine of them had not been inoculated against the virus because their parents objected, and the other three were too young to receive vaccines. The parents who objected to their children being inoculated are among a small but growing number of vaccine skeptics in California and other states who take advantage of exemptions to laws requiring vaccinations for school-age children. The exemptions have been growing since the early 1990s at a rate that many epidemiologists, public health officials and physicians find disturbing. Children who are not vaccinated are unnecessarily susceptible to serious illnesses, they say, but also present a danger to children who have had their shots — the measles vaccine, for instance, is only 95 percent effective — and to those children too young to receive certain vaccines. Measles, almost wholly eradicated in the United States through vaccines, can cause pneumonia and brain swelling, which in rare cases can lead to death. The measles outbreak here alarmed public health officials, sickened babies and sent one child to the hospital. Every state allows medical exemptions, and most permit exemptions based on religious practices. But an increasing number of the vaccine skeptics belong to a different group — those who object to the inoculations because of their personal beliefs, often related to an unproven notion that vaccines are linked to autism and other disorders. Twenty states, including California, Ohio and Texas, allow some kind of personal exemption, according to a tally by the s Hopkins University. “I refuse to sacrifice my children for the greater good,” said Sybil Carlson, whose 6-year-old son goes to school with several of the children hit by the measles outbreak here. The boy is immunized against some diseases but not measles, Ms. Carlson said, while his 3-year-old brother has had just one shot, protecting him against meningitis. “When I began to read about vaccines and how they work,” she said, “I saw medical studies, not given to use by the mainstream media, connecting them with neurological disorders, asthma and immunology.” Ms. Carlson said she understood what was at stake. “I cannot deny that my child can put someone else at risk,” she said. In 1991, less than 1 percent of children in the states with personal-belief exemptions went without vaccines based on the exemption; by 2004, the most recent year for which data are available, the percentage had increased to 2.54 percent, said Saad B. Omer, an assistant scientist at the s Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. While nationwide over 90 percent of children old enough to receive vaccines get them, the number of exemptions worries many health officials and experts. They say that vaccines have saved countless lives, and that personal-belief exemptions are potentially dangerous and bad public policy because they are not based on sound science. “If you have clusters of exemptions, you increase the risk of exposing everyone in the community,” said Dr. Omer, who has extensively studied disease outbreaks and vaccines. It is the absence, or close to it, of some illnesses in the United States that keep some parents from opting for the shots. Worldwide, 242,000 children a year die from measles, but it used to be near one million. The deaths have dropped because of vaccination, a 68 percent decrease from 2000 to 2006. “The very success of immunizations has turned out to be an Achilles’ heel,” said Dr. Mark Sawyer, a pediatrician and infectious disease specialist at Rady Children’s Hospital in San Diego. “Most of these parents have never seen measles, and don’t realize it could be a bad disease so they turn their concerns to unfounded risks. They do not perceive risk of the disease but perceive risk of the vaccine.” Dr. Sawyer and the vast majority of pediatricians believe strongly that vaccinations are the cornerstone of sound public health. Many doctors view the so-called exempters as parasites, of a sort, benefiting from the otherwise inoculated majority. Most children get immunized to measles from a combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, a live virus. While the picture of an unvaccinated child was once that of the offspring of poor and uneducated parents, “exempters” are often well educated and financially stable, and hold a host of like-minded child-rearing beliefs. Vaccine skeptics provide differing explanations for their belief that vaccines may cause various illnesses and disorders, including autism. Recent news that a federal vaccine court agreed to pay the family of an autistic child in Georgia who had an underlying mitochondrial disorder has led some skeptics to speculate that vaccines may worsen such conditions. Again, researchers say there is no evidence to support this thesis. andra , director of the Epidemiology of U.S. Immunization Law project at Washington University, said many of these parents are influenced by misinformation obtained from Web sites that oppose vaccination. “The autism debate has convinced these parents to refuse vaccines to the detriment of their own children as well as the community,” Ms. said. While many parents meet deep resistance and even hostility from pediatricians when they choose to delay, space or reject vaccines, they are often able to find doctors who support their choice. “I do think vaccines help with the public health and helping prevent the occasional fatality,” said Dr. Bob Sears, the son of the well-known child-care author by the same name, who practices pediatrics in San Clemente. Roughly 20 percent of his patients do not vaccinate, Dr. Sears said, and another 20 percent partially vaccinate. “I don’t think it is such a critical public health issue that we should force parents into it,” Dr. Sears said. “I don’t lecture the parents or try to change their mind; if they flat out tell me they understand the risks I feel that I should be very respectful of their decision.” Some parents of unvaccinated children go to great lengths to expose their children to childhood diseases to help them build natural immunities. In the wake of last month’s outbreak, Palmer considered sending her son to a measles party to contract the virus. Several years ago, the boy, now 12, contracted chicken pox when Ms. Palmer had him attend a gathering of children with that virus. “It is a very common thing in the natural-health oriented world,” Ms. Palmer said of the parties. She ultimately decided against the measles party for fear of having her son ostracized if he became ill. In the late 1960s and 1970s, measles outbreaks in Alaska and California triggered strong enforcement of vaccine mandates by states, and exemption laws followed. While the laws vary from state to state, most allow children to attend school if their parents agree to keep them home during any outbreak of illnesses prevented by vaccines. The easier it is to get an exemption — some states require barely any paperwork — the more people opt for them, according to Dr. Omer’s research, supported by other vaccine experts. There are differences within states, too. There tend to be geographic clusters of “exempters” in certain counties or even neighborhoods or schools. According to a 2006 article in The Journal of The American Medical Association, exemption rates of 15 percent to 18 percent have been found in Ashland, Ore., and Vashon, Wash. In California, where the statewide rate is about 1.5 percent, some counties were as high as 10 percent to 19 percent of kindergartners. In the San Diego measles outbreak, four of the cases, including the first one, came from a single charter school, and 17 children stayed home during the outbreak to avoid contracting the illness. There is substantial evidence that communities with pools of unvaccinated clusters risk infecting a broad community that includes people who have been inoculated. For instance, in a 2006 mumps outbreak in Iowa that infected 219 people, the majority of those sickened had been vaccinated. In a 2005 measles outbreak in Indiana, there were 34 cases, including six people who had been vaccinated. Here in California, six pertussis outbreaks infected 24 people in 2007; only 2 of 24 were documented as having been appropriately immunized. A surveillance program in the mid ’90s in Canada of infants and preschoolers found that cases of Hib fell to between 8 and 10 cases a year from 550 a year after a vaccine program was begun, and roughly half of those cases were among children whose vaccine failed. Gardiner contributed reporting from Washington. PROVE provides information on vaccines, and immunization policies and practices that affect the children and adults of Texas. Our mission is to prevent vaccine injury and death and to promote and protect the right of every person to make informed independent vaccination decisions for themselves and their family. This information is not to be construed as medical OR legal advice. Contact Information provevaccineinfo (DOT) net (email) http://vaccineinfo.net/ (web site) Subscribe to PROVE Email Updates: http://vaccineinfo.net/subscribe.htmTell a Friend about PROVE: http://vaccineinfo.net/subscribe/friends.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 The family is represented by Cuddy (New York Special Education Attorney) who is also our attorney. It is so sad that goes on today in many classrooms across the country. I thought it was a well written article but it is missing a small important piece. It only takes one traumatizing event to harm a child with autism for their entire life. It can take years to undue what untrained staff believe is appropriate treatment. Maybe the NY Times could do a follow up story. It is so important for readers to understand the enormous task that is involved to undo the damage when a child has endured this " method " of treatment. Calm Down or Else By Benedict Carey for the NY Times. tinyurl.com/6zwz26Best,Sandee Winkelman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 Amen.....I know about this all too well. I never thought to ask if my child's school had a time-out room....until I found out my Asperger's son had been locked in one on and off for two months without my knowledge or consent. The psychological ramifications are HUGE for this. My son developed Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and has an extremely heightened anxiety level as a result. The psycotherapy costs have been substantial...and there's no end in sight. When the new school year begins for many next month, I would strongly advise parents to ask if their child's school has an isolation room. You may be very surprised to learn they have one. If so, I'd ask to see it. And, while you're looking at it, decide if it's the kind of thing you want to have used as an "intervention" for your child. If not, speak up...and put your request for it not to be used on your child in writing. It may be the best thing you ever do. The Famous, the Infamous, the Lame - in your browser. Get the TMZ Toolbar Now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.