Guest guest Posted January 14, 2000 Report Share Posted January 14, 2000 I saw a report on the ABC nightly news; this is the article I found posted on their site. by a Vogel ABCNEWS.com B O S T O N, Jan. 11 — Doctors around the country say it’s tough to get the big picture when they’re swamped with cases, but this year’s flu epidemic is much like those of years past. What’s different is that flu is suddenly this year’s buzzword. “ER room visits are up and some have had to temporarily close,” says Treanor, associate professor of medicine at the University of Rochester School of Medicine in New York. But, he adds, “All of these things are quite typical of this time of year.” Epidemic As Usual In fact, Treanor says this is the fourth year in a row that flu levels have been high. “I don’t think that the influenza season is particularly worse than the past two years have been.” Of course, some states are getting hit harder than others. “It’s worse than last year and about the same as two years ago,” says Emmerman, in the Department of Emergency Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. But there is more to the story. “The number of influenza cases seems a bit higher than previous years, but this increase does not by itself account for the remarkably higher volume of recent emergency department visits,” says Theodore Delbridge in the Department of Emergency Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. “It’s just a bad time for the myriad of viruses that periodically affect us.” “Part of the problem is that what people call the flu is an amazingly large spectrum of things,” says Greg Poland, chief of the Vaccine Research Group at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and chair of the National Coalition for Adult Immunization in Bethesda, Md. “We call any illness that occurs in the winter flu.” But influenza, he says, “is a very distinct syndrome.” It comes on hard and fast, he says, with severe muscle aches, high fever, sore throat and a host of complementary symptoms that send you running for your bed. A New Test Oddly, doctors may fare little better than the average Joe at making the distinction between real flu and merely flulike symptoms. Just this year, a handful of new rapid response flu tests have become available so physicians can now diagnose influenza A or B within about an hour. Until now, doctors relied on their clinical judgment and occasional laboratory testing, which could take several days. But Kimberle Chapin, a physician at the Lahey Clinic in Burlington, Mass., who is studying one of these rapid response tests, has found evidence that doctors may see influenza where it doesn’t exist. Of 168 flu tests requested by doctors at her hospital, only 39 percent turned out to be flu. Give Me Drugs A few months ago, it wasn’t all that important whether doctors made an accurate diagnosis. But now there are two new antiviral drugs, Relenza and Tamiflu, that are effective against both influenza A and B. And for these drugs to have any significant effect on flu symptoms, people have to take them within the first 48 hours of contracting the illness. “Drug companies are pushing hard and dumping tons of money into ads,” Chapin says. “Newman is the flu showing up in your living room. People see this and say, ‘I’ve got the flu, I want that Relenza stuff.’” Bishop, CEO of Unity Physician Group in Bloomington, Ind., agrees. “We are using a lot more antiviral medications this year and a lot more people are requesting them.” Many physicians say they believe advertising dollars may be partly responsible for the extra flu-related traffic they are seeing. “There’s much more awareness of flu as a disease than there has been in the past,” Treanor says. contributed to this report. SEARCH ABCNEWS.com FOR MORE ON … ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Also, thanks for the info in response to my " What? " post; I'm O neg., but it was never an issue as my husband is also-no way we could produce a positive child. Even if there was, I'd think hard before submitting to the " treatment. " I have read a lot about this; I was just unclear on the abreviations! The AAP's reccommendation that ALL children be vaccinated for chicken pox is, IMO, irresponsible, for at least three reasons. One, it's yet another mandate that infringes upon parental choice/ two, such policies seriously limit the potential for future long-term studies by effectivly eliminating the control group. If a sizable percentage of the population were allowed to remain unvaccinated by choice (with this or any other vaccine) there would be a way to compare their long term effects with those of the vaccinated population. With all, or most, vaccinated, such studies are virtually impossible, and it can continue to be said that " there are no long term studies " . It's a self-fullfilling prophesy (and very likely intentional, at least on some level) I mean, if everyone in a given country is vaxed, how do you tell what's " normal " ? What level of asthma or learning disorders, or cancer, etc. is to be expected in an unvaxed population, all other variables being the same? The tiny percentages current mandates generate are too easily dismissed as not representative of the general population. Finally, the policy does the same thing as was done with measles, etc; it pushes the disease into the older (and very young) population where it is much more serious. ( " Immunity " wears off so adults become vulnerable, maternal antibodies are lost so infants are put at risk.) There are none so blind, I guess. I sent an email re' the Parade article " Don't Worry about vaccines. " It was quite a long and comprehensive one, as there was so much in that piece that was false or misleading. I pointed out, amoung other things, that the Dr. reccommended the Lyme vaccine for adults without mentioning the pending lawsuit charging the maker with failing to disclose that one third of the population is genetically predisposed to develop a form of arthitis from exposure to their product. (He also said that there was a vaccine available for rhotovirus, but you should ask your Dr. if your child needs it. Gee, I thought that was recalled! Guess parents don't need to know that; it might make them worry. Love, Kim. Long-term breastfeeding, family bedding, non-vaxing, vegetarian, cloth diapering, home-schooling, family businessing, non-medicating, home-birthing mom to Forest, 7yrs and Lily, 3 mths. (Just wanted to try that and see what I could come up with! LOL!!) Flu Season Hits Europe How to Fight the Flu Flu Season in Full Force Copyright ©2000 ABC News Internet Ventures. Click here for Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and Internet Safety Information applicable to this site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.