Guest guest Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 I just found this article on the web it was posted less than a month ago. It is a real disappointment to me because I just completed my second sinus surgery(hopeful that it would be my last) and was looking fowarded to starting a prescription of Budesonide via Nasoneb inhaler. Does this article go with or against anyone's personal experience with this drug? Is their any steroid that could be used via Nasoneb inhaler that may be stronger? > > > CHICAGO – Intranasal steroids were as good as saline alone as postoperative care in a randomized, double-blinded study of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and Samter's triad. > > There was no difference in disease recurrence rate, complications, or quality of life at 6 months and 1-year postoperative using intranasal saline, saline plus budesonide, or saline and budesonide combined. > > Dr. Rotenberg > > The surprising finding runs contrary to general practice and has several implications including how best to counsel patients for postoperative care, lead author Dr. Rotenberg said at the Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings. > > " If nasal steroids as done in this population don't confer any additional benefit postoperatively, should we still prescribe them? " he asked. " Should we be prescribing something different or perhaps nothing at all? Is there a potential plus side here in terms of health-care cost savings? " > > During a discussion of the study, an attendee expressed concern that insurers would interpret the results too broadly and deny coverage of postoperative nasal steroids for all patients with rhinosinusitis and polyposis, and not just those with Samter's triad, a condition consisting of asthma, aspirin sensitivity, and nasal polyposis. > > Another attendee agreed that nasal steroids are not potent enough in this population and said a pulse course of oral steroids 60 mg for 4 days can knock down symptoms in 80% of those with recurrence and be maintained with topical steroids. In the absence of a federally approved product for nasal use, he also suggested that dexamethasone eye drops can be effective. > > Dr. Rotenberg replied that all patients received 3 weeks of postoperative oral prednisone, but that pulse-dosing of steroids was limited to one patient with early recurrence. > > The 60 patients in the analysis had failed medical management for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis and had a minimum preoperative Lund-Kennedy score of 8 out of 12. Nineteen patients were randomized to saline, 21 to saline plus budesonide, and 20 to saline/budesonide combination. Their mean Lund-Mackay scores were 20.6, 19.9, and 20.5, respectively. > > Exclusion criteria included revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery, use of corticosteroids for other medical conditions, smoking, and concurrent disease with steroid contraindication. > > At 6 months postoperatively, there were no significant differences between the saline, saline plus budesonide, and saline/budesonide combination groups with regard to Lund-Kennedy scores (1.5, 0.9, and 1.2, respectively), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) ranges (all normal), and intraocular pressure (12.4, 12.9, and 13.9 mm Hg, respectively), said Dr. Rotenberg of the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario. Quality of life as assessed using the 21-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-21) was also similar at a mean of 29.7, 27.4 and 28.2, respectively. > > At 1 year of follow-up, once again there were no significant differences between the saline, saline plus budesonide, and saline/budesonide groups in Lund-Kennedy scores (3.7, 4.4, and 4.1, respectively), Lund-Mackay scores (11.8, 12.7, and 13.4, respectively), SNOT-21 scores (42.5, 47.9, and 42.2, respectively), intraocular pressure (13.1, 13.4,and 12.9 mm Hg, respectively). ACTH ranges were all normal. > > A within-group analysis showed a significant improvement in all outcomes from baseline to 6 months, and a general worsening of outcomes at 1 year compared with the first 6 months, although they were still improved over baseline, Dr. Rotenberg said. > > He pointed out that the literature is lacking in evidence guiding the postoperative management of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps undergoing surgery. One study reported that steroid nasal spray did not influence polyp recurrence rate after surgery (Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2004;34:1395-400), while another showed that normal and buffered hypertonic saline nasal sprays had no beneficial effect on postoperative symptoms compared with no treatment (Am. J. Rhinol. 2006;20:191-6). > > Dr. Rotenberg reported no relevant financial disclosures. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 I posted back in January as I had been on the Nasoneb Nebulizer for a couple of months. It has now been about 8 months I still can breathe through my nose and sleep well. Some SOS is back. Polyps small but stll there. Don't know which of the saline or budesonide is the one working but together they work for me. Don't know of any long term effects. Have follow up in a couple of weeks with my allergist. My ENT is very happy with my progress. Kris > >> > >> > >> CHICAGO – Intranasal steroids were as good as saline alone as postoperative > >> care in a randomized, double-blinded study of patients with chronic > >> rhinosinusitis and Samter's triad. > >> > >> There was no difference in disease recurrence rate, complications, or quality > >> of life at 6 months and 1-year postoperative using intranasal saline, saline > >> plus budesonide, or saline and budesonide combined. > >> > >> Dr. Rotenberg > >> > >> The surprising finding runs contrary to general practice and has several > >> implications including how best to counsel patients for postoperative care, > >> lead author Dr. Rotenberg said at the Combined Otolaryngology Spring > >> Meetings. > >> > >> " If nasal steroids as done in this population don't confer any additional > >> benefit postoperatively, should we still prescribe them? " he asked. " Should > >> we be prescribing something different or perhaps nothing at all? Is there a > >> potential plus side here in terms of health-care cost savings? " > >> > >> During a discussion of the study, an attendee expressed concern that insurers > >> would interpret the results too broadly and deny coverage of postoperative > >> nasal steroids for all patients with rhinosinusitis and polyposis, and not > >> just those with Samter's triad, a condition consisting of asthma, aspirin > >> sensitivity, and nasal polyposis. > >> > >> Another attendee agreed that nasal steroids are not potent enough in this > >> population and said a pulse course of oral steroids 60 mg for 4 days can > >> knock down symptoms in 80% of those with recurrence and be maintained with > >> topical steroids. In the absence of a federally approved product for nasal > >> use, he also suggested that dexamethasone eye drops can be effective. > >> > >> Dr. Rotenberg replied that all patients received 3 weeks of postoperative > >> oral prednisone, but that pulse-dosing of steroids was limited to one patient > >> with early recurrence. > >> > >> The 60 patients in the analysis had failed medical management for chronic > >> rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis and had a minimum preoperative > >> Lund-Kennedy score of 8 out of 12. Nineteen patients were randomized to > >> saline, 21 to saline plus budesonide, and 20 to saline/budesonide > >> combination. Their mean Lund-Mackay scores were 20.6, 19.9, and 20.5, > >> respectively. > >> > >> Exclusion criteria included revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery, use > >> of corticosteroids for other medical conditions, smoking, and concurrent > >> disease with steroid contraindication. > >> > >> At 6 months postoperatively, there were no significant differences between > >> the saline, saline plus budesonide, and saline/budesonide combination groups > >> with regard to Lund-Kennedy scores (1.5, 0.9, and 1.2, respectively), > >> adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) ranges (all normal), and intraocular > >> pressure (12.4, 12.9, and 13.9 mm Hg, respectively), said Dr. Rotenberg of > >> the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario. Quality of life as > >> assessed using the 21-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-21) was also similar > >> at a mean of 29.7, 27.4 and 28.2, respectively. > >> > >> At 1 year of follow-up, once again there were no significant differences > >> between the saline, saline plus budesonide, and saline/budesonide groups in > >> Lund-Kennedy scores (3.7, 4.4, and 4.1, respectively), Lund-Mackay scores > >> (11.8, 12.7, and 13.4, respectively), SNOT-21 scores (42.5, 47.9, and 42.2, > >> respectively), intraocular pressure (13.1, 13.4,and 12.9 mm Hg, > >> respectively). ACTH ranges were all normal. > >> > >> A within-group analysis showed a significant improvement in all outcomes from > >> baseline to 6 months, and a general worsening of outcomes at 1 year compared > >> with the first 6 months, although they were still improved over baseline, Dr. > >> Rotenberg said. > >> > >> He pointed out that the literature is lacking in evidence guiding the > >> postoperative management of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal > >> polyps undergoing surgery. One study reported that steroid nasal spray did > >> not influence polyp recurrence rate after surgery (Clin. Exp. Allergy. > >> 2004;34:1395-400), while another showed that normal and buffered hypertonic > >> saline nasal sprays had no beneficial effect on postoperative symptoms > >> compared with no treatment (Am. J. Rhinol. 2006;20:191-6). > >> > >> Dr. Rotenberg reported no relevant financial disclosures. > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.