Guest guest Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 Based on 157 chronic rhinosinusitis patients, U Penn found that about 30% had biofilms, but that figure fell to 15% among patients who never had FESS surgery, while it increased in correlation with the number of surgeries !One can imagine several hypotheses to explain this interesting finding :- FESS may scar the nasal epithelium, reduce ciliary clearance, promote growth of an atypical microbial flora, resulting in worsened condition,- or FESS may be poorly done in the first place, and subsequent surgeries may aggravate the situation,- or there may be nosocomial contamination during FESS,- or...patients who undergo the greatest number of FESS are those whose condition is the worst to begin with, and it simply aggravates over time, while the patient tries more FESS.------Prevalence of biofilm-forming bacteria in chronic rhinosinusitisAuthors: Prince, A.1; Steiger, D.2; Khalid, Ayesha N.3; Dogrhamji, Laurel2; Reger, 2; , Eau2; Chiu, G.4; Kennedy, W.2; Palmer, N.4; Cohen, Noam A.4Source: American Journal of Rhinology, Volume 22, Number 3, 5/6 2008 , pp. 239-245(7)Background: Recently, biofilms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). We sought to determine the prevalence of biofilm-forming cultures obtained from patients with CRS and clinical factors that may contribute to biofilm formation.Methods: Endoscopically guided sinonasal cultures were obtained in duplicate from CRS patients with evidence of mucopurulence. Bacterial swabs were sent for microbiological characterization and were simultaneously evaluated for biofilm-forming capacity by a modified Calgary Biofilm Detection Assay. Biofilm formation was based on concomitant values of biofilm-forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa O1 (PAO1) (positive control) and non-biofilm-forming mutants sad-31 (type IV pili) and sad-36 (flagella K; negative control). Samples, with growth greater than the sad-31 mutant, were designated as biofilm formers.Results: Sinonasal cultures were obtained from 157 consecutive patients (83 female patients) over a 4-month period. Forty-five samples (28.6%) showed biofilm formation. Among patients with a prior history of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), 30.7% (n = 42) showed biofilm growth. For patients naive to surgical intervention (n = 20), only 15% showed biofilm formation. A positive, statistically significant correlation existed between biofilm formation and number of prior FESS procedures. Polymicrobial cultures, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and/or Staphylococcus aureus comprised 71% of samples. Chi-squared analysis showed an association with prior infections, but not with any pharmacologic therapy or comorbidies.Conclusion: We show a high percentage of CRS patients (28.6%) whose sinonasal mucopurulence has biofilm-forming capacity. Postsurgical patients had a high prevalence of biofilm-forming bacteria, a possible reflection of the severe nature of their disease. Additional studies are warranted.Affiliations: 1: From The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2: Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 3: Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, and 4: Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Philadelphia Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.