Guest guest Posted March 13, 2001 Report Share Posted March 13, 2001 " brushing " as much as i know is for sensory int. issues, it helps with tactile stimulation and is usually done in conjunction with joint compression, take great care when not doing this directly with an OT, as you need to use a special " surgical " brush, the kind dr's use to scrub down before surgery and brushing should be done, as i was told in one direction, with firm pressure, because if it is too light it will be adversive to the child... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 17, 2001 Report Share Posted June 17, 2001 > " To : Thanks for the info- I just have a couple of other >questions. Is it normal for Cody to be speaking in sign all the >time?? Someone said we were focusing on sign to much, and not >enough on speech? " SPEECH, SIGN LANGUAGE ALL THE SAME TO BRAIN Communication modes light up same centers To see the item now, visit HealthScout at http://www.healthscout.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Af?id=106129 & ap=43. Here is part of the article. By Adam Marcus HealthScout Reporter Related Stories: Sign Language Improves Reading Skills Surprised Brain Is a Happy Brain Needed: Brain Donations MONDAY, Dec. 4 (HealthScout) -- It might seem that, when it comes to the way the brain handles information, a conversation in sign language is a world apart from a telephone call. After all, the first is video and the second audio. But Canadian scientists say they've found that deaf people activate the same brain regions when signing as speakers with undamaged hearing. " We've shown that this area, which typically is part of the auditory language system, does respond to these visual stimuli, " says Zatorre, a neuroscientist at McGill University in Montreal and co- author of the paper. " What we have to find out now is why it responds to these stimuli. " It could be, Zatorre says, that damage to the auditory language centers alters the nerves that handle visual language. Or, he says, it may be that the human brain evolved with a single, basic translator that processes communication. A report on the findings appears in the latest issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Some research has suggested that sign language triggers electrical activity in the brain's language centers. But it has been assumed that audio cues were processed in discrete areas and visual signals another. Zatorre and his colleagues, led by Ann Petitto, used positron emission tomography -- a scanning technique that measures the blood flow to tissue -- to examine neurons in areas of the brain thought to be specific to the production and processing of speech. The researchers studied 11 people with profound deafness from birth, who knew either American Sign Language or Langue des Signes Quebecoise, a French Canadian version of the language. For comparison, they also included 10 people without hearing trouble. Same part of brain set off The subjects were asked to perform five visual language tasks, such as a twist on word repetition and a verb generation exercise, while undergoing the brain scans. In each of these tests, the two groups of subjects had similar brain activity in the planum temporale, a brain area associated with oral language. And in a drill to trigger a mental search for verbs, the deaf subjects also showed neuron activity in the left inferior frontal cortex, another area that helps process spoken words. " Both the input and output are quite different, and yet the brain is really responding in the same way, " Zatorre says. " This area of the brain is doing something more abstract and more general than just processing sound. " Dr. Caplan, a Harvard University neuroscientist and author of an editorial accompanying the journal article, says the findings support the theory that humans have a hard-wired ability to understand language, be it spoken or visual. " At a higher level of abstraction it's all the same. It doesn't matter whether the input is visual, verbal, clicks, " or some other form, Caplan says. " The brain doesn't seem to care about the modality that's being used for communication, " agrees Dr. Gannon, director of the Neurobiology of Language Laboratory at Mt. Sinai School of Medicine in New York City. " It's communication and language whether it's auditory or visual. " Gannon, who has studied the planum temporale in chimps, says a combined auditory and visual language center for humans jibes with the way the primates communicate. " Chimps use vocalization but mostly gestures, " says Gannon. What's not clear from the work, however, is whether other rapidly changing stimuli -- traffic patterns, for instance -- trigger the same sort of brain activity in deaf people, Caplan says. " We don't know what happens in deaf people in this area when stimuli like that are presented, " he says. > " Also, he doesn't go back to the nuero. for a year, is that ok?? She >also won't recommend Omega3 and Omega6 b/c its not FDA approved. " Since when is DHA not FDA approved?! It is now! Mc's last time I checked is not-so would your neuro rather you feed your child french fry oil than fish oil? Fish oil (DHA) is only FDA approved in baby formula so far however. Ask your neurologist if it's OK to give your child baby formula then. (Your son may not be happy with that though) Or you could be really daring and assume that if fish oil (DHA) has been FDA approved safe for newborns that it will probably be FDA approved safe for older kids one day(and even big people like us too). I know-call me crazy because I think like this. > " He has night terrors sometimes, and she said she has no suggestions >for that either. " Check the archives-we have some things on this. > " And my finall question- Is it ok to talk this much?? I > hope I'm not making anyone upset by all my rambling. > Thanks again_ Matilda-mom of Cody2.10 verbal apraxia and Cole6 " Very few people talk more than I do. People can not believe that someone like me has a child that needs to learn to talk. I'm not known as a quiet person myself!! Hope that helps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2001 Report Share Posted June 18, 2001 Matilda, ramble on, girl! All of us need to talk it all out! You just say what you need to say and ask what you need to ask! Isn't there an SLP out there by you that knows about apraxia? I'm sorry I can't be of any more help to you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2001 Report Share Posted June 18, 2001 Hi Matilda, I don't have a solution for you about the night terrors, but when my son was 2 1/2 he began having them. They started right after he had his third eye surgery. I believe there was a connection, but can't substantiate it. Anyway, it was a very frustrating time. I spent 1-2 hours each many nights with him trying to comfort him. Eventually they just stopped. I can't rem. how long they lasted - seemed like forever at the time but probably was only 3 or 4 months. Usborne Books At Home Independent Supervisor 931-528-7378 888-338-6510 I Sell Books Kids Love! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2001 Report Share Posted June 18, 2001 Matilda, I just came into this post, so forgive me if some of my answers or suggestions have first been offered by other people on the list. Second, I would definitely try to find a new SLP if this is possible, and it doesnt have to necessarily have to know TONS of apraxia info, but maybe just a base of info, but as long as the person is willing to LEARN, then that person could be good choice of therapist. Yes, its nice to have our questions answered, but its also much nicer knowing that there is going to be an SLP who is willing to learn how to best treat your child! Also, as for the signing... my son Tyler, 2.9 yrs old, could only speak in sign up until a few weeks ago, the rest of our family would stress the word along with the sign, amd he now at least attempts to make a sound with the sign. Might not be intelligible to people who don't know him, but at least its a start... and your child will come to this day as well. Right now just keep re-inforcing positively for his signing use (so what he signs for, if possible, give to him) so that he can learn that words really do have meaning to other people. Oh, and for the talking... as you can see, I can keep right on up with you so don't worry, the more explanatory your emails are, the more help we will be able to be hopefully! Kari Belle Founder: Southern Calfornia Apraxia Association see us at: http://www.SouthernCaliApraxia.homestead.com __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2007 Report Share Posted June 28, 2007 Mystic, you are a true sparkling jewel and natural teacher. Love, Ellie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 O!!! YIPPEEE!!! Number 1094 in the Zero Club Zavie Zavie (age 69) 67 Shoreham Avenue Ottawa, Canada, K2G 3X3 dxd AUG/99 INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01 Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg) CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club 2.8 log reduction Sep/05 3.0 log reduction Jan/06 2.9 log reduction Feb/07 3.2 log reduction Jun/07 e-mail: zmiller@... Tel: 613-726-1117 Fax: 309-296-0807 Cell: 613-202-0204 ID: zaviem _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of mommy22goughs Sent: September 10, 2007 8:29 PM Subject: [ ] Thank you! I just wanted to say thank you to everyone on this site that is always so helpful and encouraging. I was diagnosed in May 2007 with WBC of 253,000 and found out today that I am already FISH negative (by peripheral blood). Praise the Lord! At the beginning I never thought that this would happen. And even now, I am having a hard time believing that it happened so quickly. I have one question though. I thought that the FISH test only tested 200-500 cells but my results said " the limit of detection for this assay is 1 in 2,000 cells " . My Dr said that I am FISH negative but when I look at the results, it says the test was RT-PCR. Does this mean that it wasn't a FISH test, but a not so sensitive PCR test? Either way, I am thinking this is good news. My birthday is Friday and I couldn't ask for a better present! Thanks again to everyone! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.