Guest guest Posted November 22, 2008 Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 This article shows that FESS surgery improves the sense of smell, but logically more so in patients without polyps (strong improvement) that in patients with polyps (important improvement, but still some partial dysfunction after surgery). --------- Am J Otolaryngol. 2003 Nov-Dec;24(6):366-9.Click here to read Links Subjective improvement of olfactory function after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. BF, Kountakis SE. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia, Augusta, GA 30912-4060, U OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) on subjective olfactory dysfunction in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.Materials and methods Prospective collection of data on consecutive patients undergoing FESS after failing prolonged medical therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis at a tertiary institution. Patients were asked to grade their olfactory dysfunction from 0 to 10, with 0 representing normal function and 10 complete anosmia. In addition, data such as computed tomography scores, presence or absence of nasal polyps, and the presence or absence of asthma were recorded and analyzed. Patients were followed up to 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Data were collected on 178 patients who had sinus surgery over a 2-year period. The average olfactory dysfunction score before surgery was 4.9. This improved to 0.9 at 1 year after surgery (P =.00). Higher computed tomography scores as per Lund and MacKay correlated with higher olfactory dysfunction scores (r = 0.62, P <.01) and greater improvement after surgery (r = 0.82, P <.01). Asthmatics and patients with polyps had higher subjective olfactory dysfunction scores than nonasthmatics and patients without polyps (6.8 and 7.2 v 4.4 and 4.1, respectively). All groups had subjective improvement at 1 year (2.3 and 1.5 v 0.6 and 0.7, respectively; P =.00). CONCLUSION: Patients with subjective olfactory dysfunction despite appropriate medical management for rhinosinusitis benefit from FESS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 I was wondering, how does the neti pot prevent polyp regrowth? I thought the polyps grew because of leucotrine production--an internal rather than external cause. I use the neti to clean out my sinuses, but I didn't think they did anything for polyps.Cheers,Becca"Dogs have masters, while cats have staff." --unknown Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 > From: Becca <rebeebit@...> > > I was wondering, how does the neti pot prevent polyp regrowth? I thought the > polyps grew because of leucotrine production--an internal rather than external > cause. I use the neti to clean out my sinuses, but I didn't think they did > anything for polyps. I don't understand either, but my experience with irrigation is very positive. 1. Using a pulsing device, Grossan or Waterpik, is proably more effective than the neti pot. 2. I use 600ml each time, again, probably more effective. 3. I think the irrigation clears away the gunk which otherwise facilitates the growth of polyps, even if they are triggered by internal conditions. 4. Irrigation allows steroidal nasal sprays to be more fully effective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2008 Report Share Posted November 25, 2008 Right ; as pointed out, even basic saline irrigation can help some measure against polyps by draining away all the inflammatory substances contained in the mucus, and by making the mucosa more accessible to treatment. Of course, the irrigation has to be done in a way that respects the mucosa : if you feel that you are irritated and that more irrigation diminishes the irritation, that's fine ; if, however, the irrigation is too aggressive and more irrigation increases the irritation, then it has to be toned down a bit. Normally, the mucus is clear and relatively fluid ; it contains anti-microbial agents and constitutes the first line of defense for the mucosa against external aggression. Mucus is produced by goblet cells, and is carried out of the nasal cavities (same thing for the lungs) by a synchronized, rolling movement caused by ciliated cells (or ciliae). So, when a pathogen like, say, a bacteria, enters the nose, it lands on mucus, which is supposed to trap it, attack it, and evacuate it away to the stomach, where it is destroyed for good. If, for some reason, the above mechanism doesn't work, other forms of immunity take the relay to fight the pathogen. Now, many conditions alter this mechanism. Polyps, for instance, arise for any number of reasons, one of them being Samter's, and once polyps begin to grow, they start producing inflammatory molecules that get released locally and in turn propagate the inflammation to surrounding tissues. Allergy is also a possible source of perturbation of the local mucus chemistry, because inflammatory substances such as histamine are released. Germ biofilms also release all sorts of inflammatory substances locally. These inflammatory conditions tend to reinforce one another. They also shut down the normal mucus evacuation by the ciliae, which don't appreciate inflammatory substances, so that not only is the mucus full of undesirable susbtances, but it also doesn't get flushed out. In a simple model, a vicious circle can form, where inflammation stops the natural cleaning process, and no cleaning means accumulating more inflammation. Normally, washing out the mucus is not useful, perhaps even not indicated, because it is an individual's first line of defense ; but when the mucus becomes full of inflammatory substances and starts to accumulate, it becomes on the contrary necessary to flush it out. In addition to saline (isotonic, hypotonic or hypertonic, but isotonic is the standard), some drugs can be added to the irrigation liquid in the hope of killing germs (antibiotics, dilute baby shampoo - see an old abstract on that one, etc), calming the inflammation (corticosteroids, DSCG), reducing the allergy locally (anti-histamines), etc. Corticosteroids have many side effects, but they sometimes do help control, or even reduce, polyp size over time ; so does DSCG (disodium cromoglycate) ; anti-histamines may help by reducing the production of histamine and will also reduce the production of mucus, so that can help too. If you have undergone surgery and have had your sinus ostia widened, your sinuses are then accessible for irrigation ; otherwise, their openings are usually so small that a drop of water can't get in, only a fine mist (nebulized mist) can. In the manipulation of additives to irrigation, some caution is needed. First, this is not like applying a drug to outside skin, but you are rather treating an internal mucosa, which is far more sensitive. Second, making a dosage error is unfortunately very easy. Third, there are some critical anatomical features around the nose, such as the eyes, the optical nerves, and the brain, and this requires extra vigilance ; you would not want to become blind or poorsighted after drowning your optical nerves in excess corticosteroids, for example. As a rule of thumb, and unless you want to experiment some, I would recommend not irrigating with higher doses than those that have been prescribed to you in spray form. For instance, if you sprayed two puffs of Nasonex every day in your nostrils, it would not be unreasonable to spray the Nasonex inside a Nasopure or NeilMed bottle instead, add a little saline, and then irrigate to reach further that the spray alone could. > > > From: Becca rebeebit@... > > > > I was wondering, how does the neti pot prevent polyp regrowth? I thought the > > polyps grew because of leucotrine production--an internal rather than external > > cause. I use the neti to clean out my sinuses, but I didn't think they did > > anything for polyps. > > I don't understand either, but my experience with irrigation is very > positive. > > 1. Using a pulsing device, Grossan or Waterpik, is proably more effective > than the neti pot. > > 2. I use 600ml each time, again, probably more effective. > > 3. I think the irrigation clears away the gunk which otherwise facilitates > the growth of polyps, even if they are triggered by internal conditions. > > 4. Irrigation allows steroidal nasal sprays to be more fully effective. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.