Guest guest Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 PD166326 is not such a new drug. Rowbotham first brought it to our attention in 2002. It has taken over 3 years for someone to publish the characterization of this drug in animals. Here is 's email from 2002. He was a superb researcher and we miss him. His post follows. Zavie Also, the report by Sausville in 2003 is really worth reading. http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/full/9/4/1233 Rowbotham Subject: The extraordinary PDs again! I have written for a long time about the various Parke (now part of Pfizer) inhibitors - the PD compounds, and talked to Pfizer directly about these. They are very good indeed if the reports are to be taken literally, but up to now, out of reach of patients. One of the problems Pfizer mentioned was solubility (apparently necessary for these compounds to be delivered as oral drugs), but that is being overcome. The other problem, much harder to beat, is that there is no money to be made from producing these drugs for CML patients. Nevertheless, it is encouraging that work goes on with these compounds, and as one AACR paper suggests " this structural class of compounds may serve as a prototype for the next generation of anti-CML therapeutics. " Not only are they more potent than STI (Gleevec), but some of them can also apparently deal with resistant cells. Perhaps something may yet come from this research that is valuable for CML patients in the not-too-distant future. I have attached some bits and pieces from several abstracts below. To find these in their original form, go to www.aacr.org and look at the 2002 meeting abstracts. Abstract #4198 (written by an MKSCC team) [Novel therapies are needed to suppress or overcome resistance to inhibitors of Abl tyrosine kinase. We have hypothesized that combined inhibition of BCR-Abl and downstream signaling pathways may prove to be a more effective form of therapy. Since src kinases function downstream of BCR-Abl and are structurally related to the Abl tyrosine kinase, we have sought to identify small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors that inhibit both signaling steps. Screening a family of src-selective inhibitors, we have identified a pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine compound that potently inhibits src and Abl kinases in vitro and in vivo. The molar potency of this compound is 100 times higher than STI-571 against the BCR-Abl positive K562 cells.... ....The potency and cellular specificity of this dual inhibitor suggest that this structural class of compounds may serve as a prototype for the next generation of anti-CML therapeutics.] Abstract #4199 (MSKCC) [However, the utility of PD173955 is debased by its poor solubility.... ....We report here the synthesis and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a focused library of inhibitors based on PD173955, one of which, PD166326, has already been shown to have improved solubility and a 3 to 4-fold increase in potency (in vitro IC50 of 0.13-0.5 nM) over PD173955.] [ ] Drug shows promise in leukemia treatment Hello All, Another new drug on the market? Drug shows promise in leukemia treatment <http://images.washtimes.com/images/clear.gif> <http://images.washtimes.com/images/twt-grey2.gif> Dallas, TX, May. 2 (UPI) -- An experimental drug 100 times more potent than any now available shows promise in treating one kind of leukemia, researchers said Monday. <http://z1.adserver.com/w/cp.x;rid=319;tid=20;ev=2;dt=3;ac=42;c=431;> <http://z1.adserver.com/w/cp.x;rid=319;tid=20;ev=2;ac=42;mid=4891> The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center study showed the experimental drug might be effective against human chronic myelogenous leukemia, which strikes about 5,000 Americans a year and has proved resistant to treatment. " This novel anti-leukemia drug that we have been working on shows considerable promise for going into the clinic, " said Dr. Ilaria Jr., an associate professor and senior author of the study that will appear in an upcoming issue of Blood. It has been published online. The experimental drug, called PD166326, was tested on mice with a similar form of leukemia. The tests showed it was nearly 100 times more potent than imatinib, which targets a mutated enzyme produced by patients with the specific form of leukemia. Up to 20 percent of patients taking imatinib develop resistance to the drug. " Our study represents the first published characterization of this novel anti-leukemia drug in animals, " Dr. Ilaria said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 -Thanks for this Zavie, It looks like the researches have continued working on it in spite of the great success of Gleevec. I've read and heard a lot about , it's unfortunate that some many good people have left our information group. I have heard that he is well and enjoying life, although sadly without his wife, out in . He contributed so much, it is nice to see some of the projects he spoke to us about being brought up again. Cheers, Cheryl-Anne -- In , " Zavie " <zmiller@s...> wrote: > PD166326 is not such a new drug. Rowbotham first brought it to our > attention in 2002. > > It has taken over 3 years for someone to publish the characterization of > this drug in animals. > > Here is 's email from 2002. He was a superb researcher and we miss him. > His post follows. > > Zavie > > Also, the report by Sausville in 2003 is really worth reading. > http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/full/9/4/1233 > > > Rowbotham > Subject: The extraordinary PDs again! > > I have written for a long time about the various Parke (now part of > Pfizer) inhibitors - the PD compounds, and talked to Pfizer directly about > these. They are very good indeed if the reports are to be taken literally, > but up to now, out of reach of patients. One of the problems Pfizer > mentioned was solubility (apparently necessary for these compounds to be > delivered as oral drugs), but that is being overcome. The other problem, > much harder to beat, is that there is no money to be made from producing > these drugs for CML patients. Nevertheless, it is encouraging that work goes > on with these compounds, and as one AACR paper suggests " this structural > class of compounds may serve as a prototype for the next generation of > anti-CML therapeutics. " Not only are they more potent than STI (Gleevec), > but some of them can also apparently deal with resistant cells. Perhaps > something may yet come from this research that is valuable for CML patients > in the not-too-distant future. > > I have attached some bits and pieces from several abstracts below. To find > these in their original form, go to www.aacr.org and look at the 2002 > meeting abstracts. > > > Abstract #4198 (written by an MKSCC team) > > [Novel therapies are needed to suppress or overcome resistance to inhibitors > of Abl tyrosine kinase. We have hypothesized that combined inhibition of > BCR-Abl and downstream signaling pathways may prove to be a more effective > form of therapy. Since src kinases function downstream of BCR-Abl and are > structurally related to the Abl tyrosine kinase, we have sought to identify > small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors that inhibit both signaling steps. > Screening a family of src-selective inhibitors, we have identified a > pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine compound that potently inhibits src and Abl kinases > in vitro and in vivo. The molar potency of this compound is 100 times higher > than STI-571 against the BCR-Abl positive K562 cells.... > > ...The potency and cellular specificity of this dual inhibitor suggest that > this structural class of compounds may serve as a prototype for the next > generation of anti-CML therapeutics.] > > Abstract #4199 (MSKCC) > > [However, the utility of PD173955 is debased by its poor solubility.... > > ...We report here the synthesis and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a > focused library of inhibitors based on PD173955, one of which, PD166326, has > already been shown to have improved solubility and a 3 to 4-fold increase in > potency (in vitro IC50 of 0.13-0.5 nM) over PD173955.] > > > > [ ] Drug shows promise in leukemia treatment > > > Hello All, > > Another new drug on the market? > > Drug shows promise in leukemia treatment > <http://images.washtimes.com/images/clear.gif> > <http://images.washtimes.com/images/twt-grey2.gif> > > Dallas, TX, May. 2 (UPI) -- An experimental drug 100 times more potent than > any now available shows promise in treating one kind of leukemia, > researchers said Monday. > > <http://z1.adserver.com/w/cp.x;rid=319;tid=20;ev=2;dt=3;ac=42;c=431;> > <http://z1.adserver.com/w/cp.x;rid=319;tid=20;ev=2;ac=42;mid=4891> > > The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center study showed the > experimental drug might be effective against human chronic myelogenous > leukemia, which strikes about 5,000 Americans a year and has proved > resistant to treatment. > > " This novel anti-leukemia drug that we have been working on shows > considerable promise for going into the clinic, " said Dr. Ilaria Jr., > an associate professor and senior author of the study that will appear in an > upcoming issue of Blood. It has been published online. > > The experimental drug, called PD166326, was tested on mice with a similar > form of leukemia. The tests showed it was nearly 100 times more potent than > imatinib, which targets a mutated enzyme produced by patients with the > specific form of leukemia. Up to 20 percent of patients taking imatinib > develop resistance to the drug. > > " Our study represents the first published characterization of this novel > anti-leukemia drug in animals, " Dr. Ilaria said. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Hey Cheryl, Thanks for posting this. There was an abstract about PD166326 at ASH 2003, and it's interesting to see that work is still being done on it. What's not clear from the abstract is whether it's effective against the T315I mutation (which is resistant to IM, AMN 107 and BMS-354825). The number of new agents and combination therapies being studied is also becoming something of a problem, I understand: it's getting hard to recruit enough patients to each of the studies. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. I note that no mention is made here of upcoming trials for PD166326.... Cheers, R PS - I met Ruth Marcon in town PA today - what a great lady! She didn't know about this list so I told her. I gather she hasn't been following any of the lists lately, but she wondered where a number of us had gone. > Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 19:44:24 -0400 > From: " Cheryl-Anne Simoneau " <cheryl.simoneau@...> > Subject: > > Here's the abstract - Full article to follow.... > > Blood, 15 May 2005, Vol. 105, No. 10, pp. 3995-4003. > Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on January 18, 2005; DOI > 10.1182/blood-2004-09-3534. > > Submitted September 14, 2004 > Accepted January 9, 2005 > > PD166326, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has greater anti-leukemic > activity than imatinib in a murine model of chronic myeloid leukemia > > C Wolff, Darren R Veach, P Tong, G Bornmann, Bayard > son, and L Ilaria* > > Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas > Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA Molecular Pharmacology and > Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA > Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas > Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hamon Center for Therapeutic > Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, > TX, USA > > Imatinib mesylate is highly effective in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid > leukemia (CML), but BCR/ABL-positive progenitors persist in most > imatinib-treated CML patients, indicating the need for novel therapeutic > approaches. In this study, we have used the murine CML-like > myeloproliferative disorder as a platform to characterize the > pharmacokinetic, signal transduction, and anti-leukemic properties of > PD166326, one of the most potent members of the pyridopyrimidine class of > protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In mice with the CML-like disease, > PD166326 rapidly inhibited Bcr/Abl kinase activity after a single oral dose, > and demonstrated marked anti-leukemic activity in vivo. Seventy percent of > PD166326-treated mice achieved a WBC less than 20 000/µL at necropsy, > compared with only 8% of imatinib-treated animals. Further, two-thirds of > PD166326-treated animals had complete resolution of splenomegaly, compared > to none of the imatinib-treated animals. Consistent with its more potent > anti-leukemic effect in vivo, PD166326 was also superior to imatinib in > inhibiting the constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation of numerous leukemia > cell proteins, including the src family member Lyn. PD166326 also prolonged > the survival of mice with imatinib-resistant CML induced by the Bcr/Abl > mutants P210/H396P and P210/M351T. Altogether, these findings demonstrate > the potential of more potent Bcr/Abl inhibitors to provide more effective > anti-leukemic activity. Clinical development of PD166326 or a related > analogue may lead to more effective drugs for the treatment of de novo and > imatinib-resistant CML. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Hey Thanks for your insight on this. I wonder if we would have ever thought that we would see the day when there would be more new drugs than there would be patients to trial them. Ruth is a wonderful lady, I thought she knew about this place. I will write to her. Cheers, Cheryl-Anne > Hey Cheryl, > > Thanks for posting this. There was an abstract about PD166326 at ASH 2003, > and it's interesting to see that work is still being done on it. What's not > clear from the abstract is whether it's effective against the T315I mutation > (which is resistant to IM, AMN 107 and BMS-354825). > > The number of new agents and combination therapies being studied is also > becoming something of a problem, I understand: it's getting hard to recruit > enough patients to each of the studies. It will be interesting to see how > this plays out. I note that no mention is made here of upcoming trials for > PD166326.... > > Cheers, > > R > > PS - I met Ruth Marcon in town PA today - what a great lady! She > didn't know about this list so I told her. I gather she hasn't been > following any of the lists lately, but she wondered where a number of us had > gone. > > > > > Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 19:44:24 -0400 > > From: " Cheryl-Anne Simoneau " <cheryl.simoneau@m...> > > Subject: > > > > Here's the abstract - Full article to follow.... > > > > Blood, 15 May 2005, Vol. 105, No. 10, pp. 3995-4003. > > Prepublished online as a Blood First Edition Paper on January 18, 2005; DOI > > 10.1182/blood-2004-09-3534. > > > > Submitted September 14, 2004 > > Accepted January 9, 2005 > > > > PD166326, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has greater anti- leukemic > > activity than imatinib in a murine model of chronic myeloid leukemia > > > > C Wolff, Darren R Veach, P Tong, G Bornmann, Bayard > > son, and L Ilaria* > > > > Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas > > Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA Molecular Pharmacology and > > Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA > > Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas > > Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Hamon Center for Therapeutic > > Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, > > TX, USA > > > > Imatinib mesylate is highly effective in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid > > leukemia (CML), but BCR/ABL-positive progenitors persist in most > > imatinib-treated CML patients, indicating the need for novel therapeutic > > approaches. In this study, we have used the murine CML-like > > myeloproliferative disorder as a platform to characterize the > > pharmacokinetic, signal transduction, and anti-leukemic properties of > > PD166326, one of the most potent members of the pyridopyrimidine class of > > protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In mice with the CML-like disease, > > PD166326 rapidly inhibited Bcr/Abl kinase activity after a single oral dose, > > and demonstrated marked anti-leukemic activity in vivo. Seventy percent of > > PD166326-treated mice achieved a WBC less than 20 000/µL at necropsy, > > compared with only 8% of imatinib-treated animals. Further, two- thirds of > > PD166326-treated animals had complete resolution of splenomegaly, compared > > to none of the imatinib-treated animals. Consistent with its more potent > > anti-leukemic effect in vivo, PD166326 was also superior to imatinib in > > inhibiting the constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation of numerous leukemia > > cell proteins, including the src family member Lyn. PD166326 also prolonged > > the survival of mice with imatinib-resistant CML induced by the Bcr/Abl > > mutants P210/H396P and P210/M351T. Altogether, these findings demonstrate > > the potential of more potent Bcr/Abl inhibitors to provide more effective > > anti-leukemic activity. Clinical development of PD166326 or a related > > analogue may lead to more effective drugs for the treatment of de novo and > > imatinib-resistant CML. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 <snip> PS - I met Ruth Marcon in town PA today - what a great lady! She didn't know about this list so I told her. I gather she hasn't been following any of the lists lately, but she wondered where a number of us had gone. We met Ruth at the Fall Ball in Niagara Falls back in 2002. Had a ball. Ruth is # 93 in the Zero Club Zavie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.