Guest guest Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 Thank you for this post, . Hopeful news is always welcome from the CML research front. I'm grateful to you and others who do take the time to read scientific articles and share them in a way that makes it easier to understand for those of us who are not MD's. Best to you, [ ] Gleevec may improve immune functioning As many of you know, there are hints in the literature that IM (Gleevec) interferes with certain aspects of the immune system. If true, this presents us with a couple of problems: first, it's unfortunate for us if by suppressing the tumor fighting capabilities of our immune system IM were to allow other cancers to gain a foothold while keeping our CML at bay (it was this concern, and others, which led me to try cycling on and off IM for the past couple of years - a practice which I've suspended in light of recent positive qPCR's). Second, despite all the great new drugs in the pipeline, the most promising strategies for curing CML are probably those that enhance our own (or a donor's, in the case of a mini-SCT) immune system's response to the disease, so we can recognize and kill residual cells that are insensitive to drugs. If IM inhibited the mechanisms whereby vaccination induces immunity, these otherwise promising strategies would be compromised. Happily, this February's " Blood " Journal contains an article, abstracted below, indicating that IM may actually improve immune functioning in certain important respects: " In spite of the valid concerns raised by those studies demonstrating that imatinib mesylate can impair DC maturation and T-cell function, our in vivo results together with those from Zeng et al indicate that treatment of a tumor-bearing host with STI-571 certainly did not impair antitumor immune responses but instead resulted in enhancement of T-cell responses to vaccination strategies. " The authors bolster their case with findings from other studies: " Further evidence supporting the potential positive immunomodulatory effects of imatinib mesylate has been provided in a murine model of bcr-abl+ murine leukemia and in two recently completed clinical trials for patients with CML in which vaccination strategies were added to imatinib mesylate. First, Zeng et al have shown that the combination of this drug with chaperone-rich cell lysateloaded DCs resulted in activation of antigen-specific T cells and potent antitumor activity against bcr-abl+ leukemic cells. In the clinical arena, Bocchia et al have found that in CML patients with persistent disease despite treatment with STI-571, vaccination with a P-210derived multipeptide vaccine (CMLVAX100) induces cytogenetic and even molecular improvements in the majority of treated patients. Furthermore, in this cohort of patients, prolonged treatment with STI-571 does not adversely affect T-cell responses since peptide-specific proliferation and IFN-gamma production by CD4+ T cells were clearly detected following multiple immunizations with CMLVAX100. In a second study, Li et al treated imatinib mesylateresistant CML patients with a combination of this drug and an autologous vaccine consisting of heat-shock protein (HSP) obtained from the patient's own malignant cells. This strategy also resulted in improved cytogenetic and molecular responses as well as in the expansion of IFN-gammaproducing CD8+ T cells directed specifically against autologous tumor cells. " As members of this list can attest, there is reason for skepticism regarding the reported findings and conclusions of the heat-shock protein study; nevertheless, the overall thrust of this article is a hopeful one. There are other interesting (though complicated) findings in this article, including the fact that in a mouse CML model, " treatment with [imatinib] was able to convert a T-cell encounter with antigen/APC from a tolerizing event into an activating event " . I will post a PDF of it temporarily in the Files section of the webpage. Cheers, R ____________________________________ Abstract: Imatinib mesylate (STI-571) enhances antigen-presenting cell function and overcomes tumor-induced CD4+ T-cell tolerance Hongwei Wang, Fengdong Cheng, Cuenca, Pedro Horna, Zheng Zheng, Kapil Bhalla, and M. Sotomayor From the Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. Tumor antigenspecific T-cell tolerance imposes a significant barrier to the development of effective therapeutic cancer vaccines. Bone marrowderived antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are critical in the induction of this unresponsive state. Here we show that in vitro treatment of APCs with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib mesylate (STI-571), enhances the activation of naive antigen-specific T cells and restores the responsiveness of tolerant T cells from tumor-bearing hosts. Furthermore, in vivo treatment with STI-571 not only prevented the induction of tolerance in tumor-specific CD4+ T cells, preserving their responsiveness to a subsequent immunization, but also resulted in enhanced vaccine efficacy. These findings demonstrate that tolerance to tumor antigens is not an insurmountable obstacle and points to modulation of APC function as a promising strategy in the immunotherapy of cancer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.