Guest guest Posted May 23, 2008 Report Share Posted May 23, 2008 Treatment and survival of non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients over the age of 80. Meeting:2008 ASCO Annual Meeting Abstract No:8569 Citation:J Clin Oncol 26: 2008 (May 20 suppl; abstr 8569) Author(s):F. O. Nascimento, H. P. Soares, A. Ruiz, G. B. Weinberg, M. Cusnir :Background: The incidence of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) has been increasing by 1-2% annually; the rise is most dramatic in patients over 80, in whom the rate rose 500% in the last 2 decades. Elderly are usually excluded from clinical trials, and often from treatment; thus, optimal treatment for elderly patients is unknown. The objective of this study was to review the characteristics, management and outcomes of NHL patients older than 80 years at diagnosis. Methods: The records of all patients over age 80 diagnosed with NHL from 2000 to 2005 were reviewed. A total of 107 patients were found and categorized as per the WHO classification. For statistical analysis, the patients were divided into subgroups: (I) type of tumor (a. aggressive, b. indolent), (II) international prognostic index (IPI) (1-2: low, 3-5: high), and (III) chemotherapy protocol (a. standard, b. non-anthracycline, c. no treatment). Overall survival rates were compared among subgroups of patients. Results: Thirty patients (28%) received standard chemotherapy (CHOP or CHOP-Rituximab). Forty-five (42%) received non-anthracycline chemotherapy and 32 (30%) were not treated. Overall 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 61.1±11.8% and 22.3±8.4%. The median survival time was 21±6 months. The indolent subgroup had better 1 and 3-year survival than the aggressive subgroup (70.5% and 28% versus 47.1% and 9.1% respectively, p=0.01). Similar results were seen in patients with low grade IPI when compared with high grade IPI (62.2% and 43% versus 41% and 8.1% respectively, p=0.002). The CHOP subgroup was compared with the non-anthracycline and " no treatment " subgroups in the different subtypes. In the aggressive subgroup, patients treated with CHOP had significantly longer 1-year and 3-year survival rates than those treated with non-anthracycline (76% and 42% versus 35.8% and 17% respectively, p=0.014) or those receiving no treatment (28.5% and zero, p=0.001). Conclusions: Very elderly patients with aggressive NHL (large B-cell) have significantly better survival rates at 1 and 3 years when treated with CHOP or CHOP-R. Age alone should not be a contraindication to treatment. Chemotherapy, howerver, did not affect outcome in patients with indolent NHL. http://www.abstract.asco.org/AbstView_55_36105.html All the best, ~ Karl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.