Guest guest Posted September 17, 2005 Report Share Posted September 17, 2005 Hello, I am new to this support group. I am a 37 year old woman who was recently diagnosed as having cml. At the beginning of August I was seen at mayo clinic in MN. I left mayo believing that I had myelofibrosis but mayo was awaiting one last test, a chromosome test. On my way home (I live in Indiana) after about two hours of crying believing that I needed a bmt because that's what they told me because my white count was raising too fast they called to give me the news that I had cml instead. You never seen anyone so happy to have leukemia before let me tell you! I started gleevec and the first week (400 mgs) my counts still rose higher. The second week my very enlarged spleen was within 3cm of being normal size & my white count was 13,000 almost withing normal range. The 3rd week my white count was below normal, 3.6. Now after 6 weeks my white count is 1.8. My doc that I see locally called mayo clinic and they told me to stop the med for a while and let my counts recover. My question is has anyone out there experienced this? I am so freaked out about this I just want to know if anyone has had this happen & if so what did the docs do and how did you respond? Thanks, Sheila Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2005 Report Share Posted September 17, 2005 Hi Sheila, Welcome to the group. Yes, lots of us have had low counts, especially in the beginning. Some experts view it as a good thing because it shows that the Gleevec is doing its job. Since you're new, you may want to go to the files section of this site (just click on " files " at the left) then click on the CML FAQ and the CML Glossary. Others have found these documents to be helpful, maybe you will too. Do you know what your ANC is? The ANC is more indicitive of what's going on than the WBC and the experts usually look at the ANC when they decide whether or not to take the patient off of Gleevec for a short time. Ideally, the ANC should be above 1. Many of the group members have had to temperarily stop Gleevec due to low counts so you're certainly not alone. Take care, Tracey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2005 Report Share Posted September 17, 2005 At 11:54 PM 9/16/05 +0000, you wrote: > I left mayo believing that I had >myelofibrosis but mayo was awaiting one last test, a chromosome >test. On my way home (I live in Indiana) after about two hours of >crying believing that I needed a bmt because that's what they told >me because my white count was raising too fast they called to give >me the news that I had cml instead. You never seen anyone so happy >to have leukemia before let me tell you! Hi Sheila, I answered your white count question on the ACOR list........... just wanted to say, YES, CML is known as the " good leukemia " !! Many of us got that response from our docs after Gleevec arrived. Welcome to this list. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2005 Report Share Posted September 17, 2005 Sheila, I too am in my 30's (33) and recently dx with CML. It has been my understanding that we NEVER stop the Gleevec, even if counts drop. " we treat the symptoms, " my counts dropped to in the beginning and this is a great sign of myeosuppression, or the bone marrow getting rid of the " bad " cells and then the counts will recover as you marrow starts making the good cells. This shows that the Gleevec is working. I was told that if you stop the Gleevec you have a chance to build up a resistance to the Gleevec. I live in Las Vegas but fly to Portland Oregon to see Dr. Mauro and Dr. Druker (the MD that developed the Gleevec). Of course, this is all my understanding, but I can assure you my counts did the exact same thing and some are still really low and I stayed on the Gleevec. My WBC down to 2.2, platelets down to 74, hemoglobin 10. Hope some of this helps. CML 5/13/05 Gleevec 600 mg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 17, 2005 Report Share Posted September 17, 2005 Hi Sheila and , , welcome to the group. In some cases, it is appropriate to interrupt Gleevec treatment. You can read the Gleevec prescribing information that Novartis puts out here: http://www.pharma.us.novartis.com/product/pi/pdf/gleevec_tabs.pdf Near the bottom, you'll see that if the ANC goes below 1.0 and the patient is in chronic phase, it is suggested that they interrupt treatment until the counts rebound. This is why I asked if Sheila knew her ANC because this is the count that is more concerning (as opposed to the WBC). Some doctors are now using growth factors (such as Neupogen) to increase the ANC and avoid disruption of Gleevec treatment so this is something you can talk to your doctor about if it becomes a regular problem. Good luck, Tracey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.