Guest guest Posted September 28, 2011 Report Share Posted September 28, 2011 Additional financial pressures, forced often unexpectedly, on Trial participants are unacceptable. If I'm reading this dialog correctly, one PCI patient is being billed for CT scans and other assorted tests and another isn't, at least not yet. The fact that patient costs aren't explicitly clarified in an agreement document gives me the creeps, yet I can understand why people sign on the dotted line. I've never seen " unexpected costs " referenced as a trial withdrawal factor, yet sadly, surely it has been. Interesting stuff guys. Thanks for sharing. Ann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2011 Report Share Posted September 29, 2011 A few years ago, clinical trial expenses were covered 100% by the pharmaceutical companies. Then a law was passed giving them the right to bill your private insurer for tests that would have been done by your own doctor in the course of normal treatment. No, I don't remember when this happened, I just recall reading about it. There doesn't seem to have been any force in making the insurance companies pay and so I suspect that is why some are receiving bills although I am not really sure. But it seems to be another way that pharmaceutical companies can make even more money on their drugs by shifting cost to us and still charging exorbitant prices to scared and/or dying people. I found this item regarding the future of clinical trial billing. I sure it will make the whole thing clear as mud. http://mosessinger.com/articles/files/HealthcareReformLawClinicalTrials.pdf C Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2011 Report Share Posted September 29, 2011 Some states mandate that insurance must pay for associated costs of a trial... not all, sadly, and this does affect how many enrollees they may get. People are often shocked to find that there are costs that are not covered. this link will get you to a list of states and what is or may be covered. (this is US only, sorry) http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/TreatmentsandSideEffects/ClinicalTrials/StateLaw\ sRegardingInsuranceCoverage/clinical-trials-state-laws-intro or http://tinyurl.com/43u2ydz be well, beth fillman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2011 Report Share Posted September 29, 2011 Jeff/Wayne, Thank you for bringing this very sad and anxiety-provoking situation to the group's attention. Yes, Affordable Care Act will require payment for costs associated with trials (which at present varies by State policy and law) but this aspect of the new law has not yet been implemented ... it will be phased in in 2014. Source http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Features/Insuring-Your-Health/health-law-clinica\ l-trials-coverage.aspx or http://tinyurl.com/23rk963 In the meantime, one could argue that medically necessary tests are based on the clinical circumstances, and not by formula. So in some cases requiring more than the typical number of imaging tests would be medically necessary for safety purposes in a study testing a new drug to treat a cancer. All the best, Karl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.