Guest guest Posted October 25, 2011 Report Share Posted October 25, 2011 Karni, I am disappointed for you. I am wondering if you can ask one of our experts if one of the new less-toxic tx like Cal-101, ABT 263 or PRl- would help you, or the immune modulator revlimid. It would be nice if a CLL expert could explain why any proposed tx. is more likely to help you. If I am remembering correctly, you were seeing a CLL expert? Stay in touch with us all. R Adks and AZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2011 Report Share Posted October 25, 2011 Karni, I am not a doctor, but my husband has been multi-treated at MD . He has always been a trial rat and so I am somewhat educated about the latest and the greatest treatment for relapsed patient's. I would really look into the PCI trials for your treatment. I'm not sure if you would qualify because you have to have failed certain treatments. I am sure there is a trial using Btk out there for you and your particular situation. I believe after listening and reading feedback on the inhibitor trials, that PCI is working much better then CAL101. Almost all relapsed CLLer's are seeing fantastic results from PCI while they are taking it. I don't really know what happens when they stop taking the pill but I do know that no damage is being seen at the one year mark of taking PCI. As of yesterday, my husband's blood counts are almost all in the normal ranges and that is a first since his dx in 2004. His platelets are now at 150 and it seems, at least temporarily, that PCI has strengthened his Red Blood Counts. For the first time since FCR in 2004, his Red Blood Count was 4.5 and his Hgb went up to 14.5. Please ask your Dr. about his thoughts on the PCI trial or something similar for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2011 Report Share Posted October 25, 2011 Karni, I see Dr. Hamblin has already replied and has a timely article also. And for what it is worth, I had RF in 05. My counts began to gradually increase less than a year after completion of treatment. They continued that way until Jan, 09 when they jumped to almost 200K from a couple of months earlier when they were just about 120K or so. But without doing anything they dropped almost as fast. And now almost three years later, I am approaching 200K again. But gradually. I know you won't and your Doc wouldn't advise you to get treatment too early. But I remember that I didn't feel well after seeing that jump. It has to be a bit depressing for you also. Let's hope your situation works out like mine and you have years, not months before additional treatment. Treatments are getting better. But I think all of us agree, than no treatment is better yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2011 Report Share Posted October 25, 2011 Thanks, everyone who wrote me about my post from last night. I apologize for not responding personally right now, but I'm stretched in too many directions right now. It was late when I sent it, and I failed to include the facts behind our considering treatment in the near future. Neither my onc nor I are in a hurry to treat, for sure. My Hgb is at 11.1, down from 12.3 in January of this year, but then it's seldom been above 12 since diagnosis or first treatment. My WBCs were only at 29 last week, nowhere near high enough to require treatment by themselves, because I'm otherwise feeling fine. It's just that the previous CBC 3 months ago showed that my ALC had doubled in a little over 4 months (4.2, to be exact), and this one showed an increase in less than 4 months (3.9). So my ALC doubling rate is dropping (i.e., the count is increasing more quickly), and our expectation is that they'll continue at an exponential rate. This is what they did 3+ years ago. Yes, the WBC count isn't high, but the curve upward is getting steeper. We felt 6 weeks would be a reasonable time to retest. In a case such as this, I think the point of treatment, expected at this rate to be sometime in the next half-year unless something changes, would be to avert marrow failure and to avoid a trip to the ER and emergency treatment. That's my understanding. Best wishes to all of you, and I hope to respond individually soon. Karni dx Nov. 2003 at 59 yrs, asymptomatic Trisomy 12, CD38 42%, possibly familial (mother had CLL) tx F/R 2008, feeling well ALC increasing again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.