Guest guest Posted August 12, 2011 Report Share Posted August 12, 2011 At 02:55 AM 8/12/2011, TERJOHA@... wrote: >we do not know how long the CART19 cells will >persist since there are no antibodies to >eliminate them. They will eliminate fresh CD19+ >B cells while they are still active and the >CD137 moiety might cause them to proliferate indefinitely. Whenever it is that CART19 cells no longer persist, is there any risk that some (all?) clones of normal memory B cells will no longer exist? Specifically, is it possible for CART19 therapy (or any other means) to eliminate 100% of memory B cells, such that, when normal B cells are no longer being eliminated by CART19 cells, a patient will no longer have humoral immunity to diseases to which that patient has developed immunity over a life time? Can it be assumed that very small amounts of memory B cells would survive in germinal centers despite long-term (10 months or more) presence of CART19 cells? Human memory B cells have been observed to persist for more than 50 years (reference below), but, presumably, that persistence is a result of long-term low-level replication in germinal centers. Lymphoid progenitor cells (without CD19) should survive, but, presumably, those progenitor cells do not contain such genetic memory. If memory B cells are completely eliminated, is it possible for memory T cells to confer specific antigen memory to naive B cells? Al Janski REFERENCE: " Memory B cells: Effectors of long-lived immune responses " Eur. J. Immunol. 2009. 39: 2065-2075 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eji.200939531/pdf SNIP....... Mechanisms underlying the longevity of memory B cells " ......memory B cells can persist at low but detectable frequencies for essentially the life of the host (>50 years in humans) [11, 61, 62]. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 All unknown unknowns as Rumsfeld would say Al Janski wrote: /message/15741 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 Don't forget the known unknowns... Ya know, I think Rumsfield had something there when applied to my experience with the medical powers that be. I have very few actual dx's, mostly just known unknowns. C Dr. Hamblin wrote: All unknown unknowns as Rumsfeld would say Al Janski wrote: /message/15741 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 CD19 marker is apparently lost when B cells mature to become memory B lymphocytes. " CD19 is expressed on follicular dendritic cells and B cells. In fact, it is present on B cells from earliest recognizable B-lineage cells during development to B-cell blasts but is lost on maturation to plasma cells. " (long- lasting cells are called memory B cells.) Al Janski wrote: /message/15741 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 : Memory B-cells are NOT the same as plasma cells, if my memory serves me right.. Larry wrote: > CD19 marker is apparently lost when B cells mature to become > memory B lymphocytes. > > " CD19 is expressed on follicular dendritic cells and B > cells. In fact, it is present on B cells from earliest > recognizable B-lineage cells during development to B-cell > blasts but is lost on maturation to plasma cells. " (long- > lasting cells are called memory B cells.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 At 11:10 AM 8/13/2011, S. wrote: > CD19 marker is apparently lost when B cells mature to > become memory B lymphocytes. Because human antigen-specific memory B cells exist only in low levels, they have been characterized indirectly by conversion of memory B cells into antibody-secreting B cells. This was the subject of a recent (July14 2011) Blood paper, which described an approach for direct ex vivo characterization and isolation of memory B cells. This paper reported the existence of " decreased " , " intermediate " levels CD19 on these isolated memory B cells. See link and SNIPS below. Whether such intermediate levels of CD19 afford memory B cells any protection from long-term CART19 therapy is probably not predictable at this stage. Al Janski REFERENCE: " Ex vivo characterization and isolation of rare memory B cells with antigen tetramers " ; Blood. 2011;118(2):348-357; Franz et al.; http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/118/2/348.abstract ABSTRACT: SNIP...... Studying human antigen-specific memory B cells has been challenging because of low frequencies in peripheral blood, slow proliferation, and lack of antibody secretion. Therefore, most studies have relied on conversion of memory B cells into antibody-secreting cells by in vitro culture. To facilitate direct ex vivo isolation, we generated fluorescent antigen tetramers for characterization of memory B cells by using tetanus toxoid as a model antigen. RESULTS: SNIP........ " Consistent with previous studies (Ref.13), we detected an expanded population of plasmablasts, characterized by high level expression of CD27 and moderately decreased expression of CD19 . " ----- 13. Odendahl M, Mei H, Hoyer BF, et al. Generation of migratory antigen-specific plasma blasts and mobilization of resident plasma cells in a secondary immune response. Blood. 2005;105(4):1614-1621. ----- SNIP.......... We first gated on CD19 cells that were negative for a panel of exclusion markers (CD3, CD14,CD16, 7AAD), then gated on plasmablasts, identified by high levels of CD27 and an intermediate level of CD19 expression, and finally on tetramer CD19 cells. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 Having previously read Terry's Blog on CART (Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell) technology and 's article on BiTE (Bispecific T-cell Engager) technology one cannot helped but be impressed by medical scientists and their progress in the early stages of Bio-Tinkering to get T-cells to attack B-cells. When I read of Dr. June's success I was more alarmed at the voracious nature of the CART-cells than its efficacy. My cancer/chemo battered kidneys tried to hide behind my liver when contemplating the TLS (Tumor Lysis Syndrome) experienced by the patient and described in the paper. My lay-person take on CART therapy conjured up another of my animal metaphors as I read of so many members excitement. I live in the wilderness with many species of wild and domestic animals like Coyotes, Fisher Cats, Fox, Bobcats, Dogs, Cats and yes Bears. Many of these animals help keep a balance of nature and rarely bother humans but sometimes bears can become dangerous, culminating in the rare attack on humans. Let's say a particularly dangerous Bear population begins to breed like wildfire and the threat to me becomes a crisis for which my Atlatl and 12 gage shot gun are no longer able to handle. Along comes a laid off car salesman offering to sell me a brace of T-Rex dinosaurs that he guaranties will eat up the nasty Bear clan. Wow! this is just what I need...... but I don't notice on the contract that I sign and in fine print of course, that although the T-Rexes have proven voracious they are pretty dumb due to small cranial capacity. The guy who trained the T-Rexes to eat my nasty Bears could not get the beasts to recognize just the bad Bears of the nasty Bear clan from the good bears. Training quit at the level where the T-Rexes could recognize and target all four legged fur bearing animals. The nasty Bear horde threat, being so urgent, I hastily put my money down and let the T-Rexes loose. They clean out the nasty Bears in short order along with the good bears the fox, coyote, bobcat, fisher, domestic cats, dogs and my drunk hirsute neighbor who had been crawling up the path to his cabin one night. Now, losing my garrulous hirsute neighbor was no big loss I hasten to admit but soon the environment was overrun by rats and mice who carried the fleas from which I have now contracted bubonic plague. The T-Rexes, having eaten all the animals they could recognize were looking curiously in my direction. When any new cytotoxic (cell killing) therapy comes on the scene, look to see if it targets a marker unique to the B- CANCER cell and not the both the healthy and the cancerous B-cells. In the case of CART therapy the T-cells go after CD19 located on all B-cells which will wipe out good guys even in their youth as well as the bad guys with apparent rapid efficiency. The challenge for developing CLL cytotoxic agents, specific to our cancer cells, is that an idiotype (unique to the cancer cell) marker on the surface of the B-cancer cells does not exist or has not been found or cannot yet be exploited for bio-engineering of T-cells or mAbs (monoclonal antibodies like Rituximab/Ofatumumab). The inefficiency of Rituxan/Ofatumumab may prove to be a blessing for those patients who get a good response and who do not react badly, like me, in that some of the good guy B cells are left after therapy and may confer some immune functionality although too many of the bad guys are also left who evolve to resist repeated therapy. Cancer cells are different from non-cancerous healthy cells for which a functioning immune system can detect and act on. I will get excited when we have the tools to restore immune system functionality into eliminating just the cancer cells or by a technology that can somehow create/recognize a bio- chemically unique property of the cancer cells that can be used as an exclusive target for cancer cell extermination. The current CART technology will might well be highly useful in the creation and manipulation of a future strategies based on more knowledge. KNOW YOUR BEAR! Live in the moment and practice gratitude for all that we have. Increasing options abound. WWW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2011 Report Share Posted August 17, 2011 Al Janski wrote: /message/15741 Dr. Terry Hamblin responded: >All unknown unknowns as Rumsfeld would say ----------------------------- I asked very similar questions of a friend, who is a bright, young, research immunologist at the NIAID (National Institute on Allergies and Infectious Diseases). Below are my questions, her answers, plus a comment by her. Al Janski QUESTION: Is it possible to eliminate 100% of memory B cells, such that, when normal B cells are no longer being eliminated, a patient will no longer have humoral immunity to diseases to which that patient has developed immunity over a life time? ANSWER: It is NEVER possible that I've ever seen to eliminate 100% of any immune cell- even massive chemo doesn't do this. However anytime you eliminate a memory cell you will lose humoral immunity to what that cell had memory too, which is not particularly a good thing. QUESTION: Can it be assumed that very small amounts of memory B cells would survive in germinal centers despite long-term (10 months or more) Tcell-mediated killing of CD19+ cells? ANSWER: Yes, this could certainly happen, and even more so they would remain in effector sites such as GI immune tissues & lamina propria of GI tract where T cells may not have easy access, and furthermore many B cells in effector sites (particularly mucosal sites) do not express CD19 and it would miss all of them QUESTION: Are there any lymphoid progenitor cells without CD19 (which, thus, should survive CD19-targeting) that could contain such genetic memory? and develop into memory B cells? ANSWER: Absolutely- see above QUESTION: If memory B cells are completely eliminated, is it possible for memory T cells to confer specific antigen memory to naive B cells? ANSWER: B cells & T cells help each other for antigenic memory, so lack of memory B cells could potentially impede future priming of naïve B cells. Furthermore, there are T cell independent pathways of B cell induction and maturation that could result in priming of B cells without T cell help. COMMENT: As for the lentiviral vector, it's a new field that has possibility, but should be viewed very cautiously. Anytime you introduce a lentivirus there are other complications that can arise. Also, massively altering the immune state can cause more harm than good sometimes, and should be viewed more as a last resort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2011 Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 Friends So let me see if I have this straight. This is stolen from a cartoon with a similar dialogue. Patient: So doc, with my CLL, I have a clone of lymphocytes that just keeps proliferating forever, even though they are no longer filling any helpful role Doctor: That's one way to put it. Patient: And you want to treat me with a new genetically modified clone of lymphocytes that seem to keep proliferating forever even when they are no longer filling any helpful role and they had been infected with a HIV type virus? Doctor: You got it. Patient. Are you really a doctor? Just trying to add some balance to the discussion. I am really excited about this. See my blog for more details. http://bkoffman.blogspot.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.