Guest guest Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Good news. I had nearly the same experience about two years ago now. My 'usual' pain was getting more severe, more constant, and was stealing whole pieces of my life. My diagnosed CLL was about two years old and I was told this pain had nothing to do with the CLL. Not sure that was entirely correct since I later learned my marrow was fairly well packed. But at that time the suggestions were to see a neurologist, and an orthopedist..... Endocrinology wasn't even on the list of 'other doctors'. (tho I suspect that had I pushed it psychiatrist would have been added ) I was able to avoid the other two ologists since It was about the time that Mayo released it's Vitamin D study and probably thanks to that I was able to get my GP to test my D3 levels. To his shock my D was at about a 9. I started taking 1000 iu as soon as the blood was taken. Within an hour I began to sense feeling coming back to my feet and ankles and after a few days the pain was less. I almost couldn't believe the startling change. When the results came back of course the dose was raised. I got my endocrinologist involved and he ordered tests for parathyroid, calcium, phosphorous and a few others. He found that I was hyperparathyroid as well, but felt that increasing the D3 would correct that in a month or so, and it did. Vitamin D behaves more like a hormone in our bodies, and if our D3 is off many systems can be affected adversely. The endocrinologist said that my body was stealing calcium from my bones, and hence my blood calcium levels were high. Endocrinology IS the field that would probably be the best bet to deal with D levels and how they relate. Some Doctors treat low levels by giving very large RX prescription doses and re testing months later. My endocrinologist offered that, but I opted to go the route of taking the best quality 'vitamin' ( i use solgar gel caps as they are good quality and the oil dissolves and is absorbed more easily) and changing the dose in increments. for me, about 1000 iu gave me about 10 points... that's an estimate, and everyone may be different. It took about 7 months to get up to where I wanted to be. Different approaches, but beware that some patients have found that prescription D products are NOT d3, but d2, which can be toxic. I've been told that the RX compounds are tablets which are harder for the body to use. There isn't very much good information regarding Vitamin D in the medical community. This is probably due to the fact that no one will do a study comparing subjects deliberately deprived of vitamin D to see how they fare. It's a pipe dream, but it would be nice if cancer patients had vitamin D levels added to their 'usual' blood work and a data base were compiled.... That could be done. A couple of us on the lists have noticed that it's difficult to keep our D levels on an even keel with our CLL. As my CLL ramped up, the same dose did not keep pace. I had finally, slowly gotten up to about 85, about where Mayo suggests cancer patients be, and as my CLL got to crucial levels, I am now in the 60's. I am also in treatment now, so that could be affecting everything else as well. Not sure anyone knows, and these are merely my thoughts based on my observations, but it may be that D3 doesn't hang out for long, and must be constantly replaced. Blood levels change in short order, symptoms can be quickly relieved, tho I am not sure if long term damage can be reversed, so this suggests that this substance is one that fluctuates depending on many factors, and since it has key roles to play, should be part of our regular watch dogging. For my part, a D panel is part of my usual blood work about every other month now. Apparently it's something we should monitor, but for me, the difference is dramatic. be well, Beth Fillman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Beth, I ABSOLUTELY AGREE with everything you said! 1. Depression - I was questioned about depression and like I told the doctor ...... I am not tired because I am depressed, I am depressed because I am tired! 2. REGULAR TESTING - Yes I will make sure I am tested regularly now for Vitamin D. I, like you, having read the information before hand, had already started taking Omega 3/D3 two weeks BEFORE I was tested. I shudder to think how low it might have been if I was not already taking some Vitamin D. 3. IMMEDIATE RELIEF: I didn't mention this because I thought people would think I was NUTS, but was glad to hear you had almost immediate relief. I did not experience that with the small doses but I sensed I had fast relief with the first mega dose. When I took the first round I " thought " I had experienced quick relief, ie a matter of hours, but I couldn't be sure as prior to that I was taking way too many pain pills. When it was time to take the second pill I decided to make sure I had some pain and had gone many hours without pain medication. I elected to take just the D and suffer for a few more hours. Much to my surprise, approx. 30 minutes after taking the D Gel tab, the pain actually subsided WITHOUT pain meds! It subsided to the point that I went another 3-4 hours without taking anything for pain. I thought.... " girl it must be in your head! " But maybe not....... By the way, I am using the gel cap as well and it dissolves quickly. Again, it doesn't make all the pain go away but it greatly decreases the frequency of pain meds and that, coupled with " D " helps the fatigue. 4. D3/D2 - Good points! Thanks again! Joyce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Pain itself can cause fatigue and a deficiency in Vitamin D cause osteomalacia or adult rickets [softening of the bones]. I had this a few years ago. The pain and spasms in my back was severe and I was even using a walker. I started on vitamin D, 10,000 IU a day and within two months the back pain was gone and the walker is in the store room. I still take 10,000 IU a day. And yes, with chronic illness, vitamin D use is constant and high. There are receptors for D in just about every part of the body. Besides not getting enough sun, I don't know what causes vita d deficiency, but I am sure that even if your levels were fine before CLL, just fighting cancer will lower them. And no, I don't believe a deficiency causes cancer or that having higher levels will keep you from getting cancer, but from everything I have read, it makes getting through the chemo with better outcomes a distinct possibility. Keep on taking the D... C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 For anyone on high dose vitamin D be sure to have your levels checked regularly - most people I know are checked every 3 months. Also check to see whether you are taking D2 or D3. For the doctors or researchers, I know I have read a couple of arguments for taking D3 rather than D2, but can't find the references and would appreciate it if one or more of you could chime in on this issue. Thanks! Pat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/589256_4 (free registration is required) This article should help on the D3 vs D2 argument. C Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 It is important to remember that this article represents one person's opinion. I do not know the answer myself, but most people believe there is no difference between D2 and D3 as they are both changed in the active form in the body. The most important measure is the total vitamin D levels, which should be above 30 ng/mL for best bone health. I emphasize the bone health because there might be data suggesting higher levels achieve other benefits. Rick Furman, MD Cody wrote: > http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/589256_4 > (free registration is required) > > This article should help on the D3 vs D2 argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 Here are some additional resources (links) with valuable Vitamin D information. 1) Vitamin D3- see attached link to a CLL Topics update 12/12/09 on the importance of vitamin D3 for us folks with CLL. http://updates.clltopics.org/1704-vitamin-d3-make-sure-you-are-not-deficient 2) CLL Topics has many articles on vitamin D3 & CLL. Here's an excellent tutorial overview link below (about dosing, periodic blood tests needed, and dangers to be aware of) http://www.clltopics.org/VitaminD3/EssentialforHealth.htm 3) Mayo Clinic released a paper 11/3/10 titled " Mayo Clinic Finds Insufficient Vitamin D Levels in CLL Patients Linked to Cancer Progression " Go to http://www.mayoclinic.org/news2010-rst/6033.html?rss-feedid=1 4) Some interesting comments on the Mayo 11/3/10 Vitamin D paper. Comments are from " Blood Journal " /3 Feb., 2011/Volume 117/Number 5 http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/117/5/1439.full.pdf Hope this helps - Patti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2011 Report Share Posted August 22, 2011 How much Vit D2 or D3 is recommended for a woman aged 67 weighing around 125 lbs? Thanks in advance. Q Rick Furman, MD wrote: > It is important to remember that this article represents one > person's opinion. I do not know the answer myself, but most > people believe there is no difference between D2 and D3 as > they are both changed in the active form in the body. The > most important measure is the total vitamin D levels, which > should be above 30 ng/mL for best bone health. I emphasize > the bone health because there might be data suggesting > higher levels achieve other benefits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 The current recommendations are for 400 IU daily for those younger than 65 and 600 IU daily for those over 65. I tend to dose by levels, typically having patients on 1000-2000 IU. Q wrote: > How much Vit D2 or D3 is recommended for a woman aged 67 > weighing around 125 lbs? Thanks in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2011 Report Share Posted August 23, 2011 and all, " HOW MUCH " is a question that can't be answered by factoring age or weight. The only way to figure out how much Vitamin D one NEEDS is to have blood tests that measure, not only the levels of D in your blood, but how that level is affecting other functions in your body.. 'other tests' would be, PTH, parathyroid hormone; Total Calcium; Phosphorus; and Magnesium, would be the overall panel, however depending on what your physician finds, he may do further tests. The body uses Vitamin D in many areas, including the absorption and regulation of calcium. Too low a level of D and your body will take it from your bones. Apparently this is true even if you spend all day drinking milk and eating spinach... your body will not absorb it. I have seen some 'popular' articles and even heard of doctors proscribing calcium be taken WITH vitamin D, however, without knowing what your total calcium is, and if your body can actually use more calcium, this could be at the least a wast of time and money, and at the worst cause serious health issues. First have the simple blood tests done. Then, depending on your current levels, begin taking somewhere between 400iu and 1000 iu at a time if you want to increase slowly. Most people will find they are deficient to one degree or another. What level you aspire to will depend on which research you want to believe. Bone health levels may be 30, however this is far lower than what the Mayo research indicated as ideal for cancer patients, particularly those of us with B cell malignancies. If you work with a doctor, probably and endocrinologist, they may suggest taking a patient up quickly with high dose prescription formulas, however this has not worked for some of us. Some found they were actually taking Vitamin D2 in that scenario, and saw no increase in blood levels. A good quality non prescription formula, preferably oil based gel caps are probably the best bet, AND please read labels carefully to be sure that you are ONLY getting vitamin D3, cocopherol. One nearly identical bottle of the same brand I purchased I found had huge quantities of vitamin A, five times the amount of that as the actual D3... Vitamin A is apparently found in some of the same things as d, however too much A is not a great thing..so the label said, in very small print, " incidentally occurring vitamin a " .so read labels, whether prescription or over the counter. gradual increase is probably fine for most patients. but most important is RE test, on somewhat of a regular schedule, and keep track. Some of us have found our D levels to go down on the same dose, and have wondered if this is related to progression of our CLL, however there is no actual data to support this.... just what we've noted. Hence it's not clear if upping the dose is a good idea. When I have seen that, we then go back and do a more complete panel, with PTH etc to see if the current level indicates a need for adjustment, it's the best we have available, Some things are probably not knowable. all the best. Beth Fillman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.