Guest guest Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 Hi Kathleen, I suppose to answer your question would require a study comparing FRx4 to FRx6 - and I'm not aware that such a study has been done. Here's a report on FRx6 (concurrent R vs. sequential) http://www.hemonctoday.com/article.aspx?rid=60434 See also for a report on potential benefit of achieving MRD-negative status (which I think needs validation in a randomized study) http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/23/13/2884.full which I think requires PCR testing to confirm. All the best, Karl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 You loose the B-cell surface protein CD20, that Rituxan uses as a target with each use. While it returns to some extent over time, it may also be a consideration for future treatment... ~chris > > I posted a couple of weeks ago about a decision as to whether to stop at four treatments of FR since I had a complete (clinical) response at the end of the second treatment. I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2011 Report Share Posted February 12, 2011 Kathleen - mnay folks believe that if you have responded well to four cycles, the downside of taking two money outweighs the advantages of stopping. In a message dated 2/10/2011 8:57:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, kathleenbeattie@... writes: I posted a couple of weeks ago about a decision as to whether to stop at four treatments of FR since I had a complete (clinical) response at the end of the second treatment. I weighed in with my hematologist today who said that only a small percentage of patients who respond like I have, benefit past the fourth treatment and that in balancing the potential long term immune system hit against the questionable benefit of more treatment, he felt that I should stop at four. We are going to do a four color flow cytometry and that may tip the scales. I am wondering, but forgot to ask, whether his statement about the questionable benefit of the last two treatments is supported by studies or just his gut and experience. He is a leukemia specialist at a medical research center, but not a CLL specialist. He does consult with Dr. Byrd but don’t think that this came from him. I’d appreciate any comments, especially from the medical advisors. Kathleen Beattie Little Rock, Ar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.