Guest guest Posted September 17, 2000 Report Share Posted September 17, 2000 Should HIV-infected women in developing countries breast-feed their infants? There was much debate at the XIII International Conference on AIDS, held in Durban, South Africa, in July 2000, on the pros and cons of breast-feeding, and the latest data emerging from the various breast-feeding studies has divided opinion into 2 main camps. First, there are those who strongly believe in the benefits of exclusively breast-feeding infants born to HIV-infected mothers. The opposing camp remains wary of the dangers of HIV transmission through breast milk and would prefer to use formula feeds in these children. Most of the data presented at the conference supported one view or the other. The controversy regarding feeding options for infants born to HIV-positive mothers in poor countries was sparked by a recent report in The Lancet by Coutsoudis and colleagues, which suggested that infants who were exclusively breast-fed had similar HIV transmission rates to those infants who received only formula feeds. New data on HIV transmission rates at 15 months continued to emphasize the superiority of exclusive breast-feeding over mixed feeding (24.7% vs 35.5%, respectively), while concluding that there was no significant difference in HIV transmission rates between infants exclusively breast-fed and infants given formula (24.7% vs 19.4%). Dr. Coutsoudis recommended that exclusive breast-feeding should be the feeding option of choice for HIV-infected women in developing and developed countries. However, the proportion of mothers who exclusively breast-feed their infants is extremely low, and present social and cultural norms promote the use of mixed feeding. In the Durban cohort, only 26% of the women who chose to breast-feed fed their infants with breast milk exclusively. Adding to the controversy is a recent report by Nduati and coworkers in Kenya that attributed 44% of all infant HIV infections to the effects of breast-feeding. Although this was a randomized controlled clinical trial, the breast-feeding group was not clearly delineated into exclusive and mixed feeders. A new analysis presented at Durban concluded that infants younger than 4 months had a 1.9-fold higher chance of being infected through breast-feeding than infants older than 4 months. In addition, the cumulative maternal mortality rate at 24 months was higher in the breast-feeding arm compared with the formula-feeding arm (10.5% vs 3.8%, respectively). Although this was a randomized controlled trial with an intent-to-treat analysis, other confounders, such as maternal illness, viral load, and CD4+ counts, were not controlled for. Maternal death was also strongly associated with subsequent infant death (RR, 7.8). It is extremely difficult to base recommendations on feeding practices for women in resource-poor settings on the present data from the Durban and Kenyan cohorts. Further data are vital before any recommendations are made, particularly with regard to women in resource-poor settings who cannot afford replacement feeding. Source: Lala S, Sanne I.: Vertical transmission of HIV: recent developments. Medscape Conference Summaries from the XIII International AIDS Conference, 2000. All material on this website is protected by copyright. Copyright © 1994-2000 by Medscape Inc. All rights reserved. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties. Medscape requires 3.x browsers or better from Netscape or Microsoft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.