Guest guest Posted December 30, 2000 Report Share Posted December 30, 2000 In a message dated 12/30/2000 9:10:57 AM Eastern Standard Time, 1levy1@... writes: << So basically, 49 kids were followed up, but for how long? Any self-respecting scientist (who isn't paid off by pharmaceutical companies) knows that that number is WAY too small to find any statistical significance in the results. The rate of reactions would have to be more than 1/49 for them to see anything, and if the follow-up period wasn't very long (and I'm assuming it wasn't), of course they're not going to see many, if any, reactions! >> Yep. Same ole' same ole... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.