Guest guest Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 In this paper from the journal Leukemia, you will read about 1/4 of the way down the page that ATM deletions only occurred in 5 of 22 cases of an 11q deletion. I can testify that I have 11q (but also 13q) and I've had none of the problems associated with an ATM deletion, having not needed tx. for 15 yrs. to date (except a blood transfusion last Thursday for anemia). http://www.nature.com/leu/journal/v16/n6/full/2402537a.html There's another paper that I located some time ago (if anyone's interested, I'll pull it up) that stated that an 11q deletion is a bad one when it's a single deletion and also bad in a younger population. Since I'm 66, I think my 11q deletion is meaningless. Also, I've been told by several people that having a 13q deletion also offers protection from deleterious effects of an 11q loss. Ellen cllcanada wrote: > I know that ataxia-telangiectasia is a rare inherited disorder > but is 11q deletion effectively the same? Missing ATM? > > Thanks > > ~chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.