Guest guest Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 Hi , Do you have any idea what Cancer Centers are doing standard serum level testing in the US now? Are certain nationwide labs being taught how to conduct the test yet? It sure would be nice to have every CML patient do a study to compare PCR results vs dosage and serum level. I have always felt that for my body, 400 mg was too much, and I suffer the side effects as well. I'm PCRU but I am sick most of my days. (In a nutshell!) I'm a stay at home Mom. I don't work because my days are so unpredictable with the side effects. Up and down like a rollercoaster! I also don't get Disability because I was diagnosed while raising children and not working. Isn't our system great? I have young children, and don't want to risk my PCR status messing with lowering my dose, until I see the serum level test results. When you find out any more about this, can you please let our group know? It would be very much appreciated! Many thanks for all you do! Lynn --- In , Rockefeller <rrockef1@...> wrote: > > > Posted by: " Cam " coralee.williams@... > > > > Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:22 pm (PST) > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Right now my doctor has me on 200mg of Gleevec due to low blood counts. I want > > to convince him that I need a higher dose. Where can I find articles or info > > where some top cml doctors have said that low doses are not good? I have been > > looking online but I can't seem to find anything. > > > > Cam > > Cam, > > It is possible that due to a slowed metabolism or some other mechanism, you > could be achieving a therapeutic serum level if IM (Gleevec) on 200mg/ day. > In that case you're at no greater risk of resistance than are those of us > who take 400mg/day. Not only that, but you'd be achieving the same efficacy > at half the cost and, potentially, half the side effects! > > Moreover, I know of no actual evidence that taking less than the standard > dose of IM (Gleevec) causes resistance. HOWEVER (and this is a big > however), if your IM serum level is sub-therapeutic, there are still strong > theoretical reasons to be concerned that resistance could become a problem > over time. > > When IM was first approved, Novartis asserted that serum levels hardly > varied from patient to patient, and for this reason (and probably others > which they haven't revealed) they have refused, until recently, to make > their test for IM serum level available. A number of senior CML researchers, > including Druker, feel this is misguided, and I agree, Fortunately, I > gather that recently Novartis has indeed released the test to some centers, > but it's my opinion that the test should be made available to ALL patients > who can't tolerate standard doses (and also for patients who experience a > suboptimal response at 400mg. It may be that a subset of these patients > just don't get enough of the drug into their bloodstream, rather than having > resistant or insensitive CML cells. If the former, there are probably safer > and easier ways to achieve therapeutic levels than doubling the IM dose - so > for in these cases too, serum levels would be desirable). Anyway, you might > find out whether your doctor has access to the newly available serum levels. > If so, and you could determine that your IM serum level was therapeutic on > 200 mg, then you'd be home free on that dose. > > It's more likely that this is not the case, however, and that you simply > can't tolerate 400 mg. Two other options are still available to you if > that's the case. The more conventional and almost certainly the preferable > one would be a switch to Sprycel. > > If you couldn't tolerate this drug either though, you might then consider a > pulse regimen, which might well be just as tolerable as a continuous low > dose such as you're now on, and (I firmly believe) more effective and safer. > Here's how, if I were in your shoes and in control of my own management, I > would go about designing such a regimen: > > First, I'd stop IM altogether and follow weekly CBCs until my blood counts > (red or white, whichever are most troublesomely suppressed) rebounded to a > reasonable level. Then I'd restart at 400mg and continue until the counts > dropped too far, then stop again. I would repeat cycle this AS LONG AS I > could stay on IM for at least one, and preferably two months at a time --- > AND as long as I were regularly able to keep my breaks to six weeks or less. > Treatment periods less than a month might be to short to kill leukemia > cells, while drug holidays longer than 6 weeks might give the disease long > long enough to start relapsing. > > So there you have my two bits. I hope you find them useful - or at least > interesting! > > R > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.