Guest guest Posted February 8, 2007 Report Share Posted February 8, 2007 Laurie: When I was diagnosed, my oncologist also recommended a BMT and I went to a BMT center at Shands Hospital in Florida. The doctor there quoted BMT statistics that were a 20% mortality rate if a BMT was done in the first year of diagnosis, and up to 60% if done after that. We did the work up and it was found that my brother was a match, to which he replied " How much do I get for supplying you my bone marrow? I may want to put it up on E-Bay and see if I can get even more " . As he is an attorney, I was not sure if he was serious or joking. (Maybe can answer that one.) However, even the doctor, who specialized in BMT did not recommend BMT as a front line therapy for CML. In fact, the recommendation she made was to stay on Gleevec for as long as possible and then switch to other drugs in the pipeline (at the time, neither was approved) like Sprycel and AMN107. She stated that she doubted that anyone with CML should consider a BMT, as long as these types of drugs were available to them and they were responding to them. In fact, she further stated that she would not recommend and " elective BMT " as the statistics supported medication was far safer and more effective than a BMT. Her finaly recommendation was for me to switch oncologists, because any oncologist who recommended that a BMT was the first line of treatment for CML, was not up on the latest treatments. I did switch and my current oncologist requested that I go to MD to be evaluated and make sure I had access to the latest treatments that were available. That is just my experience. I hope it makes sense to you. With hope, Matt ville, Florida In a message dated 2/8/2007 1:25:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, zmiller@... writes: Hi Laurie, Yes we have lots of opinions when it comes to doing a BMT. I have a huge problem when it comes to going for a BMT this early in the game. As long as you can live with the mortality statistics of the BMT procedure, then I would go ahead and investigate it. 50% of bone marrow patients are dead within 5 years. 10-20% don't make it past the first year. It is always a good idea to have his siblings tested to see if they are a match. There is no rush to do this. Wait and see how well he does on Gleevec and then make the decision. Give it a year. With today's medication, very few patients have to go to transplant. My opinion is tainted because I lost several dear friends who were pushed into doing a BMT. Zavie Zavie (age 68) 67 Shoreham Avenue Ottawa, Canada, dxd AUG/99 INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01 Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg) CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club PCRU 5/02 at RVH 2.8 log reduction Sep/05 3.0 log reduction Jan/06 e-mail: _zmiller@..._ (mailto:zmiller@...) Tel: 613-726-1117 Fax: 309-296-0807 Cell: 613-202-0204 ID: zaviem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2007 Report Share Posted February 8, 2007 : Since you are disabled, completely incompetent to practice law, why not make it $20,000 and we will sue for treble damages and tortious interference. Regardless, my brother is not going to have to give up his bone marrow any time soon, although his first words to me when he found out that he was a match was " Don't you wish you had been nicer to me growing up? " . You attorneys are always working an angle, whether it is a jury or a blood relative. Glad you agree with my assessment of the BMT. There is hope for you yet. Matt ville, Florida In a message dated 2/8/2007 2:40:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, deh12@... writes: Dear Laurie, I think that Shalyn, Zavie and Matt have given you very good advice, with which I agree wholeheartedly. An oncologist who pushes for a BMT a couple of weeks after diagnosis strikes me as being not very current on what's going on with CML these days. I would suggest you get a second opinion from someone with more experience. As for your brother, Matt, I'm afraid he was dead serious. An attorney has an ethical obligation to zealously represent his client's interests. In this case, your brother is his own client, so he has a legal duty to maximize the financial return on his bone marrow investment. Anything less would pose a grave risk of sanctions by the statewide bar grievance committee. I would strongly advise you that, in all further negotiations with your brother, you should be represented by independent counsel of your own. Now, I'm not licensed in Florida, but that wouldn't matter if we're just negotiating a business transaction. (If it later resulted in litigation, we'd have to retain local counsel.) So just say the word and I'll drop a retainer letter in the mail. My normal fee would be $10,000, but since I'm disabled and completely incompetent to practice law, I'll only charge you $5,000. : ) Warm regards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2007 Report Share Posted February 8, 2007 Hi Laurie, I am sorry to hear of your husband's new diagnosis but there is a lot of good info out there. Yes, I think a consult at MD is the best approach. Gleevec is the first and best line of defense. It has 5+ years of tracking and as changed the face of CML. Prior to gleevec, the prognosis without a bone marrow transplant was very poor. And with a bone marrow transplant, the risks were high. I have a cousin and a friend who both had CML prior to gleevec - one had no donor and passed away - one who had a donor but passed away from graft VS host at the age of 22. Bone marrow transplant should not be presented as the best approach to CML with all the new treatments available. Gleevec being one- but with many more on the horizon some of which are already approved and used and some which are on the cusp. What was your husband's WBC when diagnosed? Generally when diagnosed in chronic phase 400 mgs is the recommended dose (anyone correct me if this is wrong) We were also told the same thing by a dr when my husband was diagnosed - he is 32 and healthy and his CML is rare and to get a bone marrow transplant. Well we opted to not and continue on gleevec and he is great - blood counts are way down, and awaiting his results from his first 3 month test. As far as we are dealing with CML - we are calling it a condition and managing it as such...as you said like diabetes or any other chronic condition. Our last reort would be a bone marrow transplant. There are more people on this list who have some really good info regarding bone marrow transplant stories- but as I said nothing to be taken lightly. Hope this helps! Shalyn " Catch on fire with enthusiasm and people will come for miles to watch you burn. " - Wesley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2007 Report Share Posted February 8, 2007 Hi Laurie, Yes we have lots of opinions when it comes to doing a BMT. I have a huge problem when it comes to going for a BMT this early in the game. As long as you can live with the mortality statistics of the BMT procedure, then I would go ahead and investigate it. 50% of bone marrow patients are dead within 5 years. 10-20% don't make it past the first year. It is always a good idea to have his siblings tested to see if they are a match. There is no rush to do this. Wait and see how well he does on Gleevec and then make the decision. Give it a year. With today's medication, very few patients have to go to transplant. My opinion is tainted because I lost several dear friends who were pushed into doing a BMT. Zavie Zavie (age 68) 67 Shoreham Avenue Ottawa, Canada, dxd AUG/99 INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01 Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg) CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club PCRU 5/02 at RVH 2.8 log reduction Sep/05 3.0 log reduction Jan/06 e-mail: zmiller@... Tel: 613-726-1117 Fax: 309-296-0807 Cell: 613-202-0204 ID: zaviem [ ] Bone Marrow Transfusion? Hi everyone. I am fairly new to the group. My husband was diagnosed with CML on Christmas Eve 2006 and he has been on Gleevac 600 mg for about 2 weeks now. We recently went for a 2nd opinion with one of the larger oncology groups in our area. The doctor we saw suggested that we go and set up a consultation at MD or Fred Hutchens (sp?) in Seattle to see if he is a candidate for a bone marrow transfusion. He said there is the argument that maybe we should get is done sooner than later as my husband is still young (36) as opposed to waiting for him to become Gleevac resistent when he is older and not so strong. He said that there are no long term studies to see how Gleevac will work 20 years from now, etc. Do any of you have any opinions on that? We are not sure what to do. I was just getting comfortable with the fact that this was more a chronic type illness (like diabetes) and now I am scared and worried again. Thank you so much for your input. This group has really been a great source of comfort to us the last 6 weeks. Laurie Wife of Robb dx 12/24/06 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2007 Report Share Posted February 8, 2007 Dear Laurie, I think that Shalyn, Zavie and Matt have given you very good advice, with which I agree wholeheartedly. An oncologist who pushes for a BMT a couple of weeks after diagnosis strikes me as being not very current on what's going on with CML these days. I would suggest you get a second opinion from someone with more experience. As for your brother, Matt, I'm afraid he was dead serious. An attorney has an ethical obligation to zealously represent his client's interests. In this case, your brother is his own client, so he has a legal duty to maximize the financial return on his bone marrow investment. Anything less would pose a grave risk of sanctions by the statewide bar grievance committee. I would strongly advise you that, in all further negotiations with your brother, you should be represented by independent counsel of your own. Now, I'm not licensed in Florida, but that wouldn't matter if we're just negotiating a business transaction. (If it later resulted in litigation, we'd have to retain local counsel.) So just say the word and I'll drop a retainer letter in the mail. My normal fee would be $10,000, but since I'm disabled and completely incompetent to practice law, I'll only charge you $5,000. : ) Warm regards. > > > Laurie: > > When I was diagnosed, my oncologist also recommended a BMT and I went to a > BMT center at Shands Hospital in Florida. The doctor there quoted BMT > statistics that were a 20% mortality rate if a BMT was done in the first year of > diagnosis, and up to 60% if done after that. We did the work up and it was > found that my brother was a match, to which he replied " How much do I get for > supplying you my bone marrow? I may want to put it up on E-Bay and see if I can > get even more " . As he is an attorney, I was not sure if he was serious or > joking. (Maybe can answer that one.) > > However, even the doctor, who specialized in BMT did not recommend BMT as a > front line therapy for CML. In fact, the recommendation she made was to stay > on Gleevec for as long as possible and then switch to other drugs in the > pipeline (at the time, neither was approved) like Sprycel and AMN107. She > stated that she doubted that anyone with CML should consider a BMT, as long as > these types of drugs were available to them and they were responding to them. > In fact, she further stated that she would not recommend and " elective BMT " as > the statistics supported medication was far safer and more effective than a > BMT. > > Her finaly recommendation was for me to switch oncologists, because any > oncologist who recommended that a BMT was the first line of treatment for CML, > was not up on the latest treatments. I did switch and my current oncologist > requested that I go to MD to be evaluated and make sure I had access > to the latest treatments that were available. > > That is just my experience. I hope it makes sense to you. > > With hope, > > Matt > ville, Florida > > > > > > > In a message dated 2/8/2007 1:25:50 PM Eastern Standard Time, > zmiller@... writes: > > > > > Hi Laurie, > > Yes we have lots of opinions when it comes to doing a BMT. I have a huge > problem when it comes to going for a BMT this early in the game. As long as > you can live with the mortality statistics of the BMT procedure, then I > would go ahead and investigate it. 50% of bone marrow patients are dead > within 5 years. 10-20% don't make it past the first year. It is always a > good idea to have his siblings tested to see if they are a match. > > There is no rush to do this. Wait and see how well he does on Gleevec and > then make the decision. Give it a year. With today's medication, very few > patients have to go to transplant. > > My opinion is tainted because I lost several dear friends who were pushed > into doing a BMT. > > Zavie > > Zavie (age 68) > 67 Shoreham Avenue > Ottawa, Canada, dxd AUG/99 > INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF > No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01 > Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg) > CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club > PCRU 5/02 at RVH > 2.8 log reduction Sep/05 > 3.0 log reduction Jan/06 > e-mail: _zmiller@..._ (mailto:zmiller@...) > Tel: 613-726-1117 > Fax: 309-296-0807 > Cell: 613-202-0204 > ID: zaviem > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 Matt, your brother sounds very funny. Best, > > > : > > Since you are disabled, completely incompetent to practice law, why not make > it $20,000 and we will sue for treble damages and tortious interference. > > Regardless, my brother is not going to have to give up his bone marrow any > time soon, although his first words to me when he found out that he was a match > was " Don't you wish you had been nicer to me growing up? " . You attorneys > are always working an angle, whether it is a jury or a blood relative. > > Glad you agree with my assessment of the BMT. There is hope for you yet. > > Matt > ville, Florida > > > In a message dated 2/8/2007 2:40:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, > deh12@... writes: > > > > > Dear Laurie, > > I think that Shalyn, Zavie and Matt have given you very good advice, > with which I agree wholeheartedly. An oncologist who pushes for a > BMT a couple of weeks after diagnosis strikes me as being not very > current on what's going on with CML these days. I would suggest you > get a second opinion from someone with more experience. > > As for your brother, Matt, I'm afraid he was dead serious. An > attorney has an ethical obligation to zealously represent his > client's interests. In this case, your brother is his own client, > so he has a legal duty to maximize the financial return on his bone > marrow investment. Anything less would pose a grave risk of > sanctions by the statewide bar grievance committee. I would > strongly advise you that, in all further negotiations with your > brother, you should be represented by independent counsel of your > own. Now, I'm not licensed in Florida, but that wouldn't matter if > we're just negotiating a business transaction. (If it later > resulted in litigation, we'd have to retain local counsel.) So just > say the word and I'll drop a retainer letter in the mail. My normal > fee would be $10,000, but since I'm disabled and completely > incompetent to practice law, I'll only charge you $5,000. : ) > > Warm regards. > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 By the way, I'm impressed by your knowledge of treble damages and tortious interference. Are you sure you didn't go to law school? > > > : > > Since you are disabled, completely incompetent to practice law, why not make > it $20,000 and we will sue for treble damages and tortious interference. > > Regardless, my brother is not going to have to give up his bone marrow any > time soon, although his first words to me when he found out that he was a match > was " Don't you wish you had been nicer to me growing up? " . You attorneys > are always working an angle, whether it is a jury or a blood relative. > > Glad you agree with my assessment of the BMT. There is hope for you yet. > > Matt > ville, Florida > > > In a message dated 2/8/2007 2:40:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, > deh12@... writes: > > > > > Dear Laurie, > > I think that Shalyn, Zavie and Matt have given you very good advice, > with which I agree wholeheartedly. An oncologist who pushes for a > BMT a couple of weeks after diagnosis strikes me as being not very > current on what's going on with CML these days. I would suggest you > get a second opinion from someone with more experience. > > As for your brother, Matt, I'm afraid he was dead serious. An > attorney has an ethical obligation to zealously represent his > client's interests. In this case, your brother is his own client, > so he has a legal duty to maximize the financial return on his bone > marrow investment. Anything less would pose a grave risk of > sanctions by the statewide bar grievance committee. I would > strongly advise you that, in all further negotiations with your > brother, you should be represented by independent counsel of your > own. Now, I'm not licensed in Florida, but that wouldn't matter if > we're just negotiating a business transaction. (If it later > resulted in litigation, we'd have to retain local counsel.) So just > say the word and I'll drop a retainer letter in the mail. My normal > fee would be $10,000, but since I'm disabled and completely > incompetent to practice law, I'll only charge you $5,000. : ) > > Warm regards. > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2007 Report Share Posted February 9, 2007 : My brother thinks he is funnier than he actually is, but I will let him know you get his humor. I handle litigation for the company that I work for, which compromise anything from lemon law cases, civil litigation, product liability cases and insurance defense. While I don't have a law degree, I have to oversee cases, wherever they may be. So, while I may not know what I am talking about, I have actually picked up the lingo and can throw it out from time to time to look impressive. By the way, I have claimed Ricco and Treble damages several times, but never collected on either. With warm regards, Matt ville, FL DX January of 2005 Gleevec Since May 2005 Father of 3 mtmaynor@... In a message dated 2/8/2007 9:09:58 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, deh12@... writes: By the way, I'm impressed by your knowledge of treble damages and tortious interference. Are you sure you didn't go to law school? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.