Need opinion please,

[Guest guest]

Hi all

I've scraped the money together for another consultation with someone else.

i am preparing for this and am just providing a history and copies of letters

that the idiots i've seen previously have written. well saying that, i have 3

idiots, and 2 good doctors who back me up.

the idiots' letters just say all my problems are down to 'depression' and

weight. the good doctors confirm there are valid medical problems.

i am thinking i should include *all* letters from all the drs, even the idiots.

some of the stuff the idiots right is laughable : " he states he is tired and

does not sleep well " > yes, and after i pushed for it, i got a diagnosis of

severe sleep aponea (fatal if not treated). " he has asked for a testosterone

test, i suspect it will be normal. " > a year later, i found it was below normal.

etc.

i want to be seen to be honest by this new dr, and also to show him a warts and

all picture, and also pehraps he'll realise how crap some of these other doctors

are too. i am not the kind of person to spin a situation and give him only

selective 'evidence'. but if i don't, will he hold what these other doctors say

against me?

question is, do you think that by including these other letters, from idiot drs

- who look incompetent because they've missed things like low T, sleep aponea,

that the new dr will take more notice of them than me and what i say and agree

with them, or do you think he'll think they are idiots and give me a fair

evaluation?

I hope that makese sense

thanks

chris