Guest guest Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 I'm just trying to sort out my vitamins, Could someone please tell me if I should be supplementing iodine given that I have hashi's. My random urine iodine is 30ug/L ( 20-49). Lab comment was moderate iodine deficiency.I am a bit worried about not making the hashi's act up. Also I am not sure how to work out if I have a problem with RT3 dominance. My RT3 was 259 pmol/L (140 - 540) and my latest FT3 was 4.8 (3.5 - 6.5). I read somewhere about moving the decimal point? If I do that I think it comes out as 1.85. Is that correct? And if so, what does the result mean? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 27, 2011 Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 Hi , below is Dr Peatfield's speech at last year's TPA Conference - this should help you. Dr. Peatfield’s speech about Iodine From the TPA meeting on April 24, 2010, at the Alma Inn Dr. Peatfield: I’m going to talk about Iodine. Probably expecting us to say something about thyroid and stuff, and adrenals, but there is a good deal of misunderstanding and misinformation about iodine. In fact, there is propaganda against it. Most of you are a bit uncertain about iodine. [background voices – ‘yes’] You think perhaps you shouldn’t have it, especially with Hashimoto’s, [background voices – ‘yeah’]…’tis propaganda, it’s not true. So, I’m going to get a few things straight first, and start by saying that you can never be quite well without iodine. The damaging effects of iodine deficiency have actually been known for the best part of 200 years. Recent decades, though, have become convinced that it not only doesn’t help, it may actually be bad for us. Now, this conviction stems from poor animal experiments, assertions about medical matters, not backed up by evidence, with which we’re all familiar, aren’t we? The basis of this approach, and it’s undoubtedly the black hand of Big Pharma, is to convince us all that simple, safe measures are old hat, and that lovely drugs and operations and radioactive iodine are much better. The element iodine belongs to a small group of elements, which include bromine and fluorine, which are called halogens. At best bromine has little beneficial role to play in medicine, and fluorine is violently toxic; but iodine has many highly beneficial effects. Now, there’s a chap called Bernard Courtois who discovered iodine… this is just a bit of technical stuff… funnily enough, while making gunpowder from seaweed. [laughter] As you do… [background voices – ‘yes’ – more laughter] in 1811. During the next two decades it was found that iodine would prevent, and shrink, goitre. Two American doctors, Two American doctors, Marine and Larson used it for this in Michigan, around the Great Lakes, in the early 1920s, and the addition of iodine to salt was begun. This iodised salt is widely used throughout the world, though less so in the UK than previously… Physicians found that small amounts of Lugol’s iodine helped reduce goitre and hypothyroidism; but also that large amounts caused suppression of over-activity, and shrinkage of the overactive goitre. In the 1930s most especially, the use of natural thyroid became widespread; and thyroxine was synthesised in the 1950s, and the use of iodine became a thing of the past. For the overactive thyroid, the natural Lugol’s iodine also fell out of favour, and instead neomercazole and propyl thiouracil became the drugs of choice, in spite of damaging side effects. And if these weren’t enough, the radioactive form of iodine, which collects in the thyroid and kills the cells off, and surgery became the favoured treatment. In 1948 Wolff and Chaikoff concluded from rat experiments, that iodine would actually block manufacture of thyroid hormones. The truth of the matter was that a high dose would do so; but for a day or so only. By then the damage was done and iodine became less and less used – with the resultant increase in thyroid illness. Their papers had gone right through the medical fraternity –and all the doctors started to believe that iodine was, in some way, not a good thing, and it became less and less used with resulted increase in thyroid illness. In those days, iodine was used in the manufacture of bread, and even that was stopped, and instead of using io I'm just trying to sort out my vitamins, Could someone please tell me if I should be supplementing iodine given that I have hashi's. My random urine iodine is 30ug/L ( 20-49). Lab comment was moderate iodine deficiency.I am a bit worried about not making the hashi's act up. Also I am not sure how to work out if I have a problem with RT3 dominance. My RT3 was 259 pmol/L (140 - 540) and my latest FT3 was 4.8 (3.5 - 6.5). I read somewhere about moving the decimal point? If I do that I think it comes out as 1.85. Is that correct? And if so, what does the result mean? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2011 Report Share Posted August 2, 2011 Thank you Sheila. Sorry......only just found your answer. I am still working out how to use this site. That is very helpful. I have also bought his book now. Cheers > > Hi , below is Dr Peatfield's speech at last year's TPA Conference - > this should help you. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 Here is how to work out your RT3 ratio http://thyroid-rt3.com/examples.htm I just had a quick go at it for you and i got 18.5 instead of 1.85 if anybody else can confirm. Your ratio should be 20 + so it looks like you have a bit of a RT3 problem. What thyroid meds are you on at the moment, and what are your adrenals/iron like ? Steve > > Also I am not sure how to work out if I have a problem with RT3 dominance. My RT3 was 259 pmol/L (140 - 540) and my latest FT3 was 4.8 (3.5 - 6.5). I read somewhere about moving the decimal point? If I do that I think it comes out as 1.85. Is that correct? And if so, what does the result mean? > > Thanks > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 There's a calculator on here: http://www.stopthethyroidmadness.com/rt3-ratio/ You need to know the units of the units of both RT3 and free t3. Chris > > > Also I am not sure how to work out if I have a problem with RT3 dominance. My RT3 was 259 pmol/L (140 - 540) and my latest FT3 was 4.8 (3.5 - 6.5). I read somewhere about moving the decimal point? If I do that I think it comes out as 1.85. Is that correct? And if so, what does the result mean? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 Hi Steve Thanks for working that out for me. I originally posted that question a while ago, and have since commenced Armour Thyroid and am now at 1.5 grains. Just recently had new tests, but am still awaiting the FT3 result.I am now on 10.5 FT4 and 0.15 TSH. The actual report has a minus sign after the TSH number. Not sure what that means, as I don't expect you can have less than nothing??? So I guess I shall have to wait to redo the sums. I have also been supplementing iodine, selenium, B12, Folate etc since then....so I guess it will all be different by now. I shall be posting the new numbers in the next day or so, and it would be great, if you see the post, if you could perhaps redo the calculation for me, as I shall be seeing the less the lovely Endo shortly after that. Thanks for taking an interest! > > Here is how to work out your RT3 ratio > http://thyroid-rt3.com/examples.htm > > I just had a quick go at it for you and i got 18.5 instead of 1.85 if anybody else can confirm. Your ratio should be 20 + so it looks like you have a bit of a RT3 problem. > > What thyroid meds are you on at the moment, and what are your adrenals/iron like ? > > Steve > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 Hi, If you want to work out your new RT3 ratio than you will need a new RT3 test aswell as a new FT3 test as you cant use your new FT3 with your old RT3. I do not know if you are seeing an endo of your choice (from the good doc list) or just any endo, but alot of them look right past RT3. Would be nice if you could get a 24 hour saliva test done to see were ur adrenals are at, and also a full iron panel. Steve > > Hi Steve > Thanks for working that out for me. I originally posted that question a while ago, and have since commenced Armour Thyroid and am now at 1.5 grains. so I guess it will all be different by now. I shall be posting the new numbers in the next day or so, and it would be great, if you see the post, if you could perhaps redo the calculation for me, as I shall be seeing the less the lovely Endo shortly after that. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 Of course....silly me! I remembered to ask for the FT3 but forgot the RT3. But I did get my DHEAS, Testosterone etc redone as had elevated DHEAS last test ( I am menopausal)....so hopefully that will give some info re the adrenals. These are recent cumulative results: CUMULATIVE ACTH (Reference Range < 10 pmol/L) Date Time Result pmol/L 22/04/09 10:00 3.4 29/04/09 08:10 4.4 10/01/11 07.30 5.0 07/06/11 09.10 3.2 CUMULATIVE CORTISOL 22/04/2009 Cortisol (AM) 10:00 : 250 nmol/L 29/04/2009 Cortisol (AM) 08:10 : 483 nmol/L 29/06/2010 Cortisol (AM) 10:00 : 341 nmol/L 04/01/2011 Cortisol (AM) 09:25 : 281 nmol/L 10/01/2011 Cortisol (AM) 7.30 : 470 nmol/L Reference range : AM (150 - 600) 24 HOUR URINE FREE CORTISOL 7/6/2011 Cortisol U/L 43 nmol/L Urine Volume 1890 mL U-Creatinine Excretion 9.3 mmol/d (7.1 - 15.9) Cortisol Excretion 81 nmol/d (54 – 319) IGF-1 07/06/11 13nmol/L (11-29) I also had an iron panel done recently with these results: Date Iron Transferrin TFN Satn Ferritin Lab.No. umol/L umol/L % ug/L 06/07/11 9 37 12 160 Ref: (11 - 27) (20 - 45) (15 - 55) (25 - 300) The endo says I do not need to take iron, and that taking it would make no difference to these numbers. The endo is certainly not of my choice, but I am in a remote part of Australia.....and it is case of beggars not choosers. He is not the doctor who prescribed the Armour.....and indeed he has said he will not prescribe it when it runs out in a month or so time. That was before he admitted he didn't even know what it was!!! I am trying to stay positive and see it as an opportunity to bring him up to speed.........if not, then I shall just have to push him off his perch! I guess all I can really do is wait and see how the numbers look when I get them back. I am certainly better than I was, but not there yet. Cheers > > Hi, If you want to work out your new RT3 ratio than you will need a new RT3 test aswell as a new FT3 test as you cant use your new FT3 with your old RT3. I do not know if you are seeing an endo of your choice (from the good doc list) or just any endo, but alot of them look right past RT3. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 Hi sickovit (love that name ) Im glad you are feeling better atleast, im in a similar situation im feeling the best ive felt in years but still a while to go. Im afraid i know nothing about blood cortisol apart from it seems to be a load of crap lol for instance i had " normal " blood cortisol tests, yet my 24 hour sailiva test every single one of them came in below range and once i started HC i noticed a hugh improvemment, so why was my blood cortisol in range ? no idea! sorry i cant help there. Regarding Iron, have a read of this when u have a moment explaining what the " ideal " iron labs should look like. http://thyroid-rt3.com/iron.htm It does look like your saturation and serum iron are lower than reccommended, with your ferritin looking good but could possibly be falsesly elvated due to inflamation. Sure post your new results when you get them, and i hope things continue to improve Steve > > Of > > I guess all I can really do is wait and see how the numbers look when I get them back. I am certainly better than I was, but not there yet. > > Cheers > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.