Re: Research Misconduct in the UK Source: BMJ

[Guest guest]

Unfortunately, it isn't necessarily a case of just research

misconduct in our case, it is also a case of a refusal to research. Check out

the statements made by the RCP, BTA et al re diagnosis and management of

thyroid disease, and not one of their statements do they back up with research

to the medical science or any clinical studies apart from the very flawed

clinical studies done that showed (using 900 participants) that T4/T3

combination worked no better than T4-only. Our Register of Counterexamples to

T4-only therapy now stands at 1684, most of whom are willing to testify to the

fact that their symptoms continued with T4-only therapy but were mitigated or

disappeared when they started some form of T3-therapy.

Luv - Sheila

Research misconduct is widespread in the UK and

harms patients writes British Medical Journal editor, Fiona Godlee.

Source

http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.d8357

http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e14?tab=related

Research misconduct can harm patients, distort the evidence base, misdirect

research effort, waste funds and damage public trust in science. Countries all

over the developed world are now recognising the need to set up systems to

deter, detect, and investigate research misconduct. Why does the UK have no

plans to do the same?

Further reading

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2350711/pdf/bmj00535-0005.pdf

http://www.rsm.ac.uk/media/downloads/j06-05research.pdf

Food for thought in the thyroid debate.

No

virus found in this message.

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4726 - Release Date: 01/06/12

[Guest guest]

Dear and All,

First, in the US, the Office of Research Integrity only examines US funded

projects, which are about a third of all research.

Second, I have analyzed the relevant research to this depravity and found

substantial mistakes that directly affect those with continuing symptoms. The

problem lies in just who or what is going to force the medical powers to become

honest.

Have a great day,

>

> Research misconduct is widespread in the UK and harms patients writes British

Medical Journal editor, Fiona Godlee.

>

> Source

> http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.d8357

> http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e14?tab=related

>

> Research misconduct can harm patients, distort the evidence base, misdirect

research effort, waste funds and damage public trust in science. Countries all

over the developed world are now recognising the need to set up systems to

deter, detect, and investigate research misconduct. Why does the UK have no

plans to do the same?

>

> Further reading

>

> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2350711/pdf/bmj00535-0005.pdf

> http://www.rsm.ac.uk/media/downloads/j06-05research.pdf

>

> Food for thought in the thyroid debate.

>

[Guest guest]

Naming and Shaming!

Luv - Sheila

First, in the US, the Office of Research Integrity only examines US funded

projects, which are about a third of all research.

Second, I have analyzed the relevant research to this depravity and found

substantial mistakes that directly affect those with continuing symptoms. The problem lies

in just who or what is going to force the medical powers to become honest.

Have a great day,