Guest guest Posted February 2, 2012 Report Share Posted February 2, 2012 Hi Sheila That info is still available on the site and they were: Professor Edzard Ernst, Dr Tim Cheetham, Dr Graham Beastall, Dr Kerbel, Dianne (endocrine nurse), Dr Petros Perros, Mr Barney on, Professor Lazarus, Professor Colin Dayan. I'm sorry I don't know the answers to your other questions. Debs > > Dear all - I need some help. > > . Can anybody remember the names of all the Thyroid Experts from BTA > who were on the team? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 2, 2012 Report Share Posted February 2, 2012 Hello SheilaThe "experts" were:-Professor Colin DayanProfessor LazarusMr Barry onDr Petros PerrosDiane - NurseDr KerbelDr Graham BeastallI did not see anything at all from Barry harrison, but I saw contributions from the others, I think Kind regards From: Sheila <sheila@...> thyroid treatment Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2012, 17:20 Subject: BTA Thyroid experts??? Dear all - I need some help. · Can anybody remember the names of all the Thyroid Experts from BTA who were on the team? · How many questions had been asked before three pages were removed, leaving just two pages when it closed down? At one time, (and this was early on) there were over 1400 messages covering five pages that I saw, but as we know, most of these had been removed or deleted, leaving just two pages when it finally closed down on Tuesday, early. · How many questions did the Experts answer? · How many of the Experts took part? Luv - Sheila Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2012 Report Share Posted February 3, 2012 God - Dayan must have been walking a careful line then. Did anyone see any of his replies and were they as irritating as the others? He's been my endo in the past and has always been really open about things!!!! > > Hello Sheila Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2012 Report Share Posted February 3, 2012 Hi He only answered about 3 questions. His response to me was: " In a separate post on T3/T4 treatment I have described the reasons why doctors are reluctant to prescribe T3. It is unusual that your T3 is not a lot higher considering that you are on doses of T3 that are 2-3x the normal requirement. This raises the possibility that you do not absorb it very well. An abnormality in the pituitary or adrenal gland would not explain this. and on 'T3/T3 combination treatment': " There have been clinical trials comparing T4 treatment with T4+T3 treatment and overall they show no benefit. T3 is much more difficult to monitor as the levels go up and down within a few hours whereas they are much more stable on T4. Compared to treatment with T4, where there is experience from thousands of patients in studies and millions of people worldwide over many years, there is no long-term information on the use of T3 in large numbers of people. We do know that even a mild degree of over treatment with T4 increases the risk of osteoporosis, fractures and heart disease (atrial fibrillation) with a risk of stroke. These risks are likely to be higher with T3, as this is the active hormone and the body cannot control the activity of the hormone in the way it can with T4. It is for these reasons that doctors are reluctant to prescribe T3. Patients who take it and are certain that they derive benefit need to be aware that they may be exposing themselves to longer term health risks, especially with regard to the heart and the bones. And they should take the lowest dose possible to keep these risks as low as possible. Because the risks are likely to take many years to develop, there is a tendency for patients to ignore them, with the possibility that they may regret it later. This is particularly an issues in patients who only had subclinical hypothyroidism to begin with and in whom (see separate posting) there is not currently clinical trial data that treatment reduced healthy risks in the long term. It is worth considering the comparison with HRT for the menopause. Several years ago, this was considered a wonder treatment for women, and only more recently has it become apparent that it increases the risk of breast cancer and heart disease. General guidance to doctors is " first do no harm " . " and on 'Stopped taking T4' (person can't tolerate T4): " If your cortisol is low, you should have a Synacthen test to check whether it really is low (ie whether it can still rise under stimulation or not). This is important, as if it really is low, it does need treatment. And it is important to take the cortisol before T4 treatment as the T4 will lower your cortisol levels. Note however, that it is important to be tested, and not just to take cortisol " as a trial " , as long-term treatment with cortisol can have side-effects. You should only be on it if your body is truly deficient in it. " on 'Subclinical hypothyroidism treatment: " There are no large scale/ long term clinical trials on treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism. This means that it has not been proven either way whether treatment helps. Taking thyroxine, so long as the TSH level is carefully monitored and kept in the reference range is not likely to do any harm, so it is safe to try. Treating subclinical hypothyroidism doesn't lower cholesterol very much in most people, and taking a statin is more effective. " That's all I noted. Love Jacquie > > God - Dayan must have been walking a careful line then. > > Did anyone see any of his replies and were they as irritating as the others? > > He's been my endo in the past and has always been really open about things!!!! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2012 Report Share Posted February 3, 2012 Dear , There are cases in law in the US that go to this situation. Basically, the claim is that when the medical practice guidelines are enforced (GMC) or threatened to be enforced they are no longer voluntary, they are mandatory... That is why he is walking the line. He would like to retain his career. Have a great day, > > God - Dayan must have been walking a careful line then. > He's been my endo in the past and has always been really open about things!!!! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.