Guest guest Posted February 21, 2012 Report Share Posted February 21, 2012 Thanks Glynis! Seems this is meant to be a consultation document for public response: just noticed - there's a series of questions down the right hand side. I question their motives too (considering how Dr S is being treated, yet again); maybe worth completing questions? (Personally, I doubt it, but can't really complain - after the event - if it gets EVEN worse.) I even suspect that many medics/their families could respond to load the votes... because they think " It'll never happen to me! " . http://www.gmc-uk.org/concerns/fitness_to_practise_consultations.asp > After a quick skim of the document it looks to me like they are trying to change the name of the kangaroo court and to ensure that even if the doctor is exonerated they can still restrict his or her practice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.