Guest guest Posted November 16, 2007 Report Share Posted November 16, 2007 >If what makes the H2O2 treatment effective is the oxygen, I wonder if it is reasonable to suppose that MMS would do the same thing even more?< I don't know the answer, but what I do know is that the MMS oral protocol and the H2O2 oral protocol are VERY similar in not only in the adminisration, but in the results. If anything, I think the H2O2 oral protocol is rougher. I did it about a third of the way up the drops-per-day scale about 6-7 years ago, had some really scary reactions, got scared and dropped it. Now I understand more about what is going on. I have thought that after I finally conquer the MMS protocol (When, Oh When?) that I may resume the H2O2 protocol. My reason is this- I've now done several things that gave me marvelous results and I always thought I had finally conquered my disease, but I always found out later that I was wrong, that the disease came back. Some things, such as Beck wrist electrification, I cannot do again because of developed sensitivity from overuse (I really hate that, I LOVE the Beck method!) I already have very little expectation that MMS will cure everything because it is now obvious to me that it cannot get into a necrotic tooth root, and it probably can't get into a root-canaled tooth where the gutta pecha shrinks from inside the tooth leaving a gap for bacteria to live. Oh well, now I've begun to ramble... Daddybob No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.34/1134 - Release Date: 11/16/2007 9:52 AM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.