RE: Marshall's post on waiting 3 minutes for MMS activation

[Guest guest]

Dan , Im going to pirate that and put it in the group discription. IN NCDan Nave <Dan.Nave@...> wrote: > Re: [MDI_News] logic, reasoning OR Fuzzy Logic> > The 3 minute waiting period is to maximize the effect. > Basically the chlorous acid breaks down at a fairly rapid rate (prior > to dilution), producing chlorine dioxide, which is then absorbed into > the water giving it a yellow-green tint. At approximately 3 minutes, > the water will become saturated so that it can absorb no further > chlorine dioxide.> So if you wait less than 3 minutes, you will have less chlorine > dioxide in the liquid when you drink it. If you wait over 3 minutes, > the chlorous acid will continue breaking down, but no further chlorine> dioxide can be absorbed, so it will diffuse into the air. So if you > wait more than 3 minutes, you end up with less chlorous acid. So

> either way, the AMMS is losing effectiveness, too little time, and you> don't get as much initial "jolt" although the long term amount > released would be the same, and too much time, and it would be like > using less AMMS.> > Marshall> > Case wrote:> >> > Case in point: the issue of quantification of the MMS activationagent > > has produced, despite the resistance of those who seemed to want to> >censor the topic, the consensus that it doesn't matter how strong an> >acid is used nor how much, as long as it exceeds the strength of a > >10% solution of citric acid in a 5:1 ratio. The opinion has > >been offered that the 3 minute waiting period is critical, but it has> >not been made clear what difference it makes if one waits for longerthan that.> >> > Any of these aspects may or may not

be the kind about which one can > >be very loose without worrying about consequences, but they equally > > possibly could be critical, and for this reason I think it best to > >try to ascertain exactly what is going on at the molecular levelbefore > >one allows oneself to be cavalier with quantifiables.> >THERE IS NO MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!This list is the 1st Amendment in action. The things you will find hereare for information and research purposes only. We are people sharinginformation we believe in. If you act on ideas found here, you do so atyour own risk. Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and theability to take responsibility for your own actions. By joining the listyou agree to hold yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself. Do not useany ideas found here without consulting a medical professional, unlessyou are a researcher or health care provider.

Groups Links Wilkins

http//:www.juiceplus.com/+lw55887

The Children's Research Foundation Children 6-15 FREE for 3 years

Never miss a thing. Make your homepage.

[Guest guest]

Well, ok by me, but it is Marshall Dudley's post...

Dan

From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of WilkinsSent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:45 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Marshall's post on waiting 3 minutes for MMS activation

Dan , Im going to pirate that and put it in the group discription.

IN NCDan Nave <Dan.Navenilfisk-advance> wrote:

> Re: [MDI_News] logic, reasoning OR Fuzzy Logic> > The 3 minute waiting period is to maximize the effect. > Basically the chlorous acid breaks down at a fairly rapid rate (prior > to dilution), producing chlorine dioxide, which is then absorbed into > the water giving it a yellow-green tint. At approximately 3 minutes, > the water will become saturated so that it can absorb no further > chlorine dioxide.> So if you wait less than 3 minutes, you will have less chlorine > dioxide in the liquid when you drink it. If you wait over 3 minutes, > the chlorous acid will continue breaking down, but no further chlorine> dioxide can be absorbed, so it will diffuse into the air. So if you > wait more than 3 minutes, you end up with less chlorous acid. So > either way, the AMMS is losing effectiveness, too little time, and you> don't get as much initial "jolt" although the long term amount > released would be the same, and too much time, and it would be like > using less AMMS.> > Marshall> > Case wrote:> >> > Case in point: the issue of quantification of the MMS activationagent > > has produced, despite the resistance of those who seemed to want to> >censor the topic, the consensus that it doesn't matter how strong an> >acid is used nor how much, as long as it exceeds the strength of a > >10% solution of citric acid in a 5:1 ratio. The opinion has > >been offered that the 3 minute waiting period is critical, but it has> >not been made clear what difference it makes if one waits for longerthan that.> >> > Any of these aspects may or may not be the kind about which one can > >be very loose without worrying about consequences, but they equally > > possibly could be critical, and for this reason I think it best to > >try to ascertain exactly what is going on at the molecular levelbefore > >one allows oneself to be cavalier with quantifiables.> >THERE IS NO MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!This list is the 1st Amendment in action. The things you will find hereare for information and research purposes only. We are people sharinginformation we believe in. If you act on ideas found here, you do so atyour own risk. Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and theability to take responsibility for your own actions. By joining the listyou agree to hold yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself. Do not useany ideas found here without consulting a medical professional, unlessyou are a researcher or health care provider.

[Guest guest]

Marshal wrote the there is no medical advice here..?..OK Marshal, Im going to pirate it IN NCDan Nave <Dan.Nave@...> wrote: Well, ok by me, but it is Marshall Dudley's post... Dan From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of WilkinsSent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:45 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Marshall's post on waiting 3 minutes

for MMS activation Dan , Im going to pirate that and put it in the group discription. IN NCDan Nave <Dan.Navenilfisk-advance> wrote: > Re: [MDI_News] logic, reasoning OR Fuzzy Logic> >

The 3 minute waiting period is to maximize the effect. > Basically the chlorous acid breaks down at a fairly rapid rate (prior > to dilution), producing chlorine dioxide, which is then absorbed into > the water giving it a yellow-green tint. At approximately 3 minutes, > the water will become saturated so that it can absorb no further > chlorine dioxide.> So if you wait less than 3 minutes, you will have less chlorine > dioxide in the liquid when you drink it. If you wait over 3 minutes, > the chlorous acid will continue breaking down, but no further chlorine> dioxide can be absorbed, so it will diffuse into the air. So if you > wait more than 3 minutes, you end up with less chlorous acid. So > either way, the AMMS is losing effectiveness, too little time, and you> don't get as much initial "jolt" although the long term amount > released would be the same, and too much time,

and it would be like > using less AMMS.> > Marshall> > Case wrote:> >> > Case in point: the issue of quantification of the MMS activationagent > > has produced, despite the resistance of those who seemed to want to> >censor the topic, the consensus that it doesn't matter how strong an> >acid is used nor how much, as long as it exceeds the strength of a > >10% solution of citric acid in a 5:1 ratio. The opinion has > >been offered that the 3 minute waiting period is critical, but it has> >not been made clear what difference it makes if one waits for longerthan that.> >> > Any of these aspects may or may not be the kind about which one can > >be very loose without worrying about consequences, but they equally > > possibly could be critical, and for this reason I think it best to > >try

to ascertain exactly what is going on at the molecular levelbefore > >one allows oneself to be cavalier with quantifiables.> >THERE IS NO MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!This list is the 1st Amendment in action. The things you will find hereare for information and research purposes only. We are people sharinginformation we believe in. If you act on ideas found here, you do so atyour own risk. Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and theability to take responsibility for your own actions. By joining the listyou agree to hold yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself. Do not useany ideas found here without consulting a medical professional, unlessyou are a researcher or health care provider.

[Guest guest]

oh, that is the tagline on all posts to the MDI-news list.

I'm sure it's grabbable. I made it a sig file.

Kathy

THERE IS NO MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!

This list is the 1st Amendment in action. The things you will find here are for information and research purposes only. We are people sharing information we believe in. If you act on ideas found here, you do so at your own risk. Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and the ability to take responsibility for your own actions. By joining the list you agree to hold yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself. Do not use any ideas found here without consulting a medical professional, unless you are a researcher or health care provider.

-----Original Message-----From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of WilkinsSent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:11 PM Subject: RE: [ ] Marshall's post on waiting 3 minutes for MMS activation

Marshal wrote the there is no medical advice here..?..OK Marshal, Im going to pirate it

IN NCDan Nave <Dan.Navenilfisk-advance> wrote:

Well, ok by me, but it is Marshall Dudley's post...

Dan

THERE IS NO MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!This list is the 1st Amendment in action. The things you will find hereare for information and research purposes only. We are people sharinginformation we believe in. If you act on ideas found here, you do so atyour own risk. Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and theability to take responsibility for your own actions. By joining the listyou agree to hold yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself. Do not useany ideas found here without consulting a medical professional, unlessyou are a researcher or health care provider.