Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: [MDI_News] logic, reasoning OR Fuzzy Logic

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Wayne Fugitt wrote:

>

> It is used in the control systems for refrigerators, washers, dryers,

> and other sophisticated appliances today.

Yes, I wondered if anyone was going to remark on the fact that Fuzzy

Logic is a computing term. It's perhaps most easily explained by talking

about thermostats,

Whatever the terminology used in talking about the resistance to

precision that sparked the topic, one should of course recognise that it

is by no means peculiar to women.

When it comes to cooking, for instance, I personally am very reluctant

to submit to the tyranny of recipes. My main objection to them is that

they rarely make clear which of the instructions or quantities specified

are essential and which optional, nor attempt to make clear what is

actually going on in the interactions of the ingredients. For example,

of the countless thousands of people who use baking powder, how many do

you suppose actually know what it is and does, let alone know that they

could save significant money over a period of time by replacing, e.g. " 3

tsps baking powder " with " 2 tsps baking soda + 1 tsp citric acid " .

Recipe books basically cater to people who don't actually want to

understand a process, but just want a set of simple instructions, from

which they may then never dare to deviate. My own method with a new dish

is usually to follow a recipe precisely one time to set a sort of

standard, and then improvise from there. Cooking for me is very like

improvising music....

Oddly enough, in my experience it is more likely to be a female than a

male observer who is alarmed by watching the way I cook, without blind

respect for The Recipe. I don't see this usually as an indication of

their having more logical minds, and myself as a fuzzy logician, so much

as their being more inclined to follow than explore.

In the domain of medicine, however, I take a completely different view,

and it is ironic to find myself in some discussions about MMS being the

one who is seeking a precise recipe or formula, while various of the

ladies are insisting on allowing wide margins of deviation.

My view is that only when one knows exactly what the chemicals involved

are doing, and how they are interacting with each other and with

whatever they, singly or in concert, are encountering in the body, can

one feel free to decide which details matter and which don't.

Case in point: the issue of quantification of the MMS activation agent

has produced, despite the resistance of those who seemed to want to

censor the topic, the consensus that it doesn't matter how strong an

acid is used nor how much, as long as it exceeds the strength of a 10%

solution of citric acid in a 5:1 ratio. The opinion has been offered

that the 3 minute waiting period is critical, but it has not been made

clear what difference it makes if one waits for longer than that.

Any of these aspects may or may not be the kind about which one can be

very loose without worrying about consequences, but they equally

possibly could be critical, and for this reason I think it best to try

to ascertain exactly what is going on at the molecular level before one

allows oneself to be cavalier with quantifiables.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your intent here is good. However, it appears to me that you are asking

questions that have been answered but you want to delegate the

responsibility of finding the information to someone else rather than

doing any work yourself. (You sound like my boss... ;-))

The issues of activation times etc have been covered quite well in Jim

Hubble's book part 1 and 2. Also, either in this list or the MDI list,

Marshall Dudley wrote a very well thought out and presented analysis of

the chemistry of the combination of Citric acid and MMS and why we need

a 10% solution and a ratio of 5:1 drops, etc.

You seem to have a gift for organization, so how about doing a little

legwork and organizing all this stuff for us duffers.

Thanks,

Dan

________________________________

From:

[mailto: ] On Behalf Of Chris

Case

Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:56 PM

MDI_News ;

Subject: [ ] Re: [MDI_News] logic, reasoning OR

Fuzzy Logic

Case in point: the issue of quantification of the MMS activation agent

has produced, despite the resistance of those who seemed to want to

censor the topic, the consensus that it doesn't matter how strong an

acid is used nor how much, as long as it exceeds the strength of a 10%

solution of citric acid in a 5:1 ratio. The opinion has been offered

that the 3 minute waiting period is critical, but it has not been made

clear what difference it makes if one waits for longer than that.

Any of these aspects may or may not be the kind about which one can be

very loose without worrying about consequences, but they equally

possibly could be critical, and for this reason I think it best to try

to ascertain exactly what is going on at the molecular level before one

allows oneself to be cavalier with quantifiables.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dan Nave wrote:

> Your intent here is good. However, it appears to me that you are asking

> questions that have been answered but you want to delegate the

> responsibility of finding the information to someone else rather than

> doing any work yourself. (You sound like my boss... ;-))

>

>

Eh? Asking questions, and coming to conclusions from the various not

altogether consistent replies, is doing some work, as is googling all

around to try to find the almost non-existent information about internal

use of chlorine dioxide. This doesn't seem to me like delegating.

> The issues of activation times etc have been covered quite well in Jim

> Hubble's book part 1 and 2. Also, either in this list or the MDI list,

> Marshall Dudley wrote a very well thought out and presented analysis of

> the chemistry of the combination of Citric acid and MMS and why we need

> a 10% solution and a ratio of 5:1 drops, etc.

>

> You seem to have a gift for organization, so how about doing a little

> legwork and organizing all this stuff for us duffers.

>

That is under way, as http://mmsweb.info should demonstrate. I have been

busy with other things lately, but it is my intention to collate the

threads about these quantification issues and reproduce them in the FWW

MMS forum ( http://floatingworldweb.com/plex/#-11656 ), although things

have been slowed down a bit by finding that rather than this site

prompting people to help bring together the information, it provoked

cries of outrage from those who found the interface challenging or for

whose browser the domain forwarding did not work, so it's on hold for

the moment. Also, I don't feel the question about acid amounts has been

definitively answered. If you could give me links to Marshall Dudley's

analysis, I'd appreciate it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks dan,

lol, i agree with you, i think that the activation time issue is

covered very well by the author. and thanks also for the refferance

to the the chemistry of the combination of Citric acid and MMS, that

will prove to be interesting reading.

>

> Your intent here is good. However, it appears to me that you are

asking

> questions that have been answered but you want to delegate the

> responsibility of finding the information to someone else rather

than

> doing any work yourself. (You sound like my boss... ;-))

>

> The issues of activation times etc have been covered quite well in

Jim

> Hubble's book part 1 and 2. Also, either in this list or the MDI

list,

> Marshall Dudley wrote a very well thought out and presented

analysis of

> the chemistry of the combination of Citric acid and MMS and why we

need

> a 10% solution and a ratio of 5:1 drops, etc.

>

> You seem to have a gift for organization, so how about doing a

little

> legwork and organizing all this stuff for us duffers.

>

> Thanks,

>

> Dan

>

> ________________________________

>

> From:

> [mailto: ] On Behalf Of

Chris

> Case

> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 8:56 PM

> MDI_News ;

> Subject: [ ] Re: [MDI_News] logic,

reasoning OR

> Fuzzy Logic

>

> Case in point: the issue of quantification of the MMS activation

agent

> has produced, despite the resistance of those who seemed to want to

> censor the topic, the consensus that it doesn't matter how strong an

> acid is used nor how much, as long as it exceeds the strength of a

10%

> solution of citric acid in a 5:1 ratio. The opinion has been offered

> that the 3 minute waiting period is critical, but it has not been

made

> clear what difference it makes if one waits for longer than that.

>

> Any of these aspects may or may not be the kind about which one can

be

> very loose without worrying about consequences, but they equally

> possibly could be critical, and for this reason I think it best to

try

> to ascertain exactly what is going on at the molecular level before

one

> allows oneself to be cavalier with quantifiables.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am going to re-post two of Marshall's posts, I'm sure he won't mind...

Also, I am going to change the subject heading, so don't let that throw you off.

Notice who he is replying to

Dan

From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of CaseSent: Friday, November 30, 2007 10:31 AM Subject: Re: [ ] Re: [MDI_News] logic, reasoning OR Fuzzy Logic

Dan Nave wrote:> Your intent here is good. However, it appears to me that you are asking> questions that have been answered but you want to delegate the> responsibility of finding the information to someone else rather than> doing any work yourself. (You sound like my boss... ;-)) >> Eh? Asking questions, and coming to conclusions from the various notaltogether consistent replies, is doing some work, as is googling allaround to try to find the almost non-existent information about internaluse of chlorine dioxide. This doesn't seem to me like delegating.> The issues of activation times etc have been covered quite well in Jim> Hubble's book part 1 and 2. Also, either in this list or the MDI list,> Marshall Dudley wrote a very well thought out and presented analysis of> the chemistry of the combination of Citric acid and MMS and why we need> a 10% solution and a ratio of 5:1 drops, etc.>> You seem to have a gift for organization, so how about doing a little> legwork and organizing all this stuff for us duffers.> That is under way, as http://mmsweb.info should demonstrate. I have beenbusy with other things lately, but it is my intention to collate thethreads about these quantification issues and reproduce them in the FWWMMS forum ( http://floatingworldweb.com/plex/#-11656 ), although thingshave been slowed down a bit by finding that rather than this siteprompting people to help bring together the information, it provokedcries of outrage from those who found the interface challenging or forwhose browser the domain forwarding did not work, so it's on hold forthe moment. Also, I don't feel the question about acid amounts has beendefinitively answered. If you could give me links to Marshall Dudley'sanalysis, I'd appreciate it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...