Re: MMS selectivity (a thought)

[Guest guest]

Case wrote:

MMS works by oxidizing. Normal cells "breath" aerobically. The cells we

don't want "breath" anaerobically.

Thus an oxidizer would not be harmful to a normal cell and may even be

helpful but to an anaerobic cell it would be death.

Sort of like if you put a mouse and a fish in an enclosed tank the

mouse would live as long as there was oxygen (aerobic breathing) while

the fish would die. (the fish isn't actually anaerobic but I'm just

using it for illistration). Fill the tank with water and the mouse

would die and the fish would live.

I do believe that the MMS doesn't go around looking for anaerobic cells

but will kill them when it runs into them. More than likely most of the

aerobic cells already have all the oxygen they need or they would use

the oxygen from the MMS just like any other available oxygen ions and

the chlorine would still go off with the sodium hand in hand so to

speak and make salt:)

Personally I don't think there is a need for probiotics because of

taking MMS although there are a lot of other reasons for taking them.

Just a few thoughts as I can't seem to get to sleep tonight:)

3c. Re: MMS herx possible toxic reaction

Posted by: "Kat" makiah@... katmakiah

Date: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:08 pm ((PST))

It is unstable and I guess you could say stressed out. So it wants to be stable, and in order to do that, it needs electrons from Pathogens. Electrons from healthy cells will not help it, so it doesn't bother with healthy cells.

Search though I may, I can find neither proof nor logical argument to

indicate that this is absolutely true. It may be, and it would be

great to have some reason to KNOW this, but all I can find in the

discussion groups and Dr. Humble's book is the claim. If it is true,

why do people bother to take probiotics after a bout of MMS?