Guest guest Posted February 17, 2008 Report Share Posted February 17, 2008 1b. Re: MMS selectivity (a thought) Posted by: "" okielinda@... lindawcoffin Date: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:13 pm ((PST)) MMS works by oxidizing. Normal cells "breath" aerobically. The cells we don't want "breath" anaerobically. Thus an oxidizer would not be harmful to a normal cell and may even be helpful but to an anaerobic cell it would be death. Yes, I know this is the gospel, along with the assertion that the pathogens are destroyed by MMS because they are acidic. But every time the questions come up about whether all and only harmful entities are aerobic or acidic, there has always been a chorus of opinions for various views, and nothing has ever been resolved with reference to anything but belief and Dr. Humble's assertions. If (Bad=acidic=anaerobic), it is the sort of thing that would be known to ordinary medicine. I've been hoping that someone with expert knowledge in the field of medicine or biochemistry would weigh in on this issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 When the body gets diarrhea, it flushes out the healthy intestinal flora in the colon. Probiotics replace it. The MMS didn't kill it, it just got washed out in the deluge. Kathy PS, When you're reading the posts at the website, and Chris's posts scroll way across the page, if you hit reply, it will wrap his post and make it easier to read. > > > > > 3c. Re: MMS herx possible toxic reaction > > Posted by: " Kat " makiah@... katmakiah > > Date: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:08 pm ((PST)) > > It is unstable and I guess you could say stressed > > out. So it wants to be stable, and in order to do that, it needs > > electrons from Pathogens. Electrons from healthy cells will not help > > it, so it doesn't bother with healthy cells. > Search though I may, I can find neither proof nor logical argument to > indicate that this is absolutely true. It may be, and it would be > great to have some reason to KNOW this, but all I can find in the > discussion groups and Dr. Humble's book is the claim. If it is true, > why do people bother to take probiotics after a bout of MMS? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Keep hoping! I would love to read such. Kathy > > > > > 1b. Re: MMS selectivity (a thought) > > Posted by: " " okielinda@... lindawcoffin > > Date: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:13 pm ((PST)) > > > > MMS works by oxidizing. Normal cells " breath " aerobically. The cells we > > don't want " breath " anaerobically. > > Thus an oxidizer would not be harmful to a normal cell and may even be > > helpful but to an anaerobic cell it would be death. > > > > > Yes, I know this is the gospel, along with the assertion that the > pathogens are destroyed by MMS because they are acidic. > > But every time the questions come up about whether all and only harmful > entities are aerobic or acidic, there has always been a chorus of > opinions for various views, and nothing has ever been resolved with > reference to anything but belief and Dr. Humble's assertions. If > (Bad=acidic=anaerobic), it is the sort of thing that would be known to > ordinary medicine. I've been hoping that someone with expert knowledge > in the field of medicine or biochemistry would weigh in on this issue. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.