Guest guest Posted October 27, 2000 Report Share Posted October 27, 2000 Duncan Crow wrote: > > Hi all (and Jim); > > I tend to agree with you that the technologies are pretty much a similar > kick at the cat with various degrees of success, but I can't help but feel > that there is congruence coming up that points to the possibility that > harmonics in various forms that can heal will be accepted someday by regular > medicine. Orthodox medicine already accepts ENS for pain control and recently EMP has been used for control of depression. And, they are experimenting successfully with too many other electronic methods to go into. > > For example, giving the brain frequencies (electronically) alone can result > in miraculous remissions. Prayer and meditation can also do that, > particularly (it seems) in group prayer. And of course, thinking happy > thoughts. I used electronically assisted meditation at 5.5 Hz to heal my heart from congestive heart failure. That freq is deep theta where the mind goes " from knowledge to knowing " and is healing in its own right. > > For me, it seems that ancient techniques are going to be mainstream once we > can point to the dial and say 'it wasn't placebo effect after all'. At > least they'll all be able to agree. I'm personally not that much a > spiritualist but it does seem that all these methods have something in > common. Many doctors, including the developer of TENS, use aucpuncture points in conjunction with an electronic box that was designed as a CES (cranial elecrical stimulation) device. It is becoming commonplace in certain research circles. > > And the potential to use these same freqs presents an interesting mind > control probability that has also been explored and of course, cannot be > discounted. Yes it can be discounted, for the most part. Mind control is highly overrated, except in the movies. Visual & media input are significantly more mind-controlling. > > Me, I like the pulser too, and the blood electrifier, but I confess I > haven't Rifed or zapped at this point. You haven't missed much. Why go through the time & expense to rife when oxygenation will accomplish the same things? The only thing I don't like about oxidative therapies is that they are so effective over such a wide bandwidth of disease, that they sound like snake oil to many. jim ----- carpe diem, carpe pucunia, carpe femina. -- Jim Lambert jlambert@... http://www.entrance.to/madscience http://www.entrance.to/poetry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2001 Report Share Posted October 15, 2001 Hi Dick, Does this help? http://www.skyboom.com/j-k-r/TREATMENTUTILIZINGFREQUENCIES.htm Because every man and woman is a unique individual there is no feasible way to find a single cure that will fit us all. Even medications for specific maladies don’t work in every case. This is why sometimes treating one patient with a specific frequency is valuable through electro magnetics while to another it may be more effective to use light or electricity or another medium even though they have the same identical disease because we do not have a wonder cure that fits everyone. We made an attempt to give an answer that would incorporate all the needs utilizing many specifications of different systems and techniques. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2008 Report Share Posted March 5, 2008 Just in case the idea of Frequencies a la Frex I have just been referring to relative to insect bites and shingles is puzzling to some, here is something that might explain it a bit: Dr Mercola's recent newsletter referred to an article from Live Science (Feb 08) as under: Scientists may one day be able to destroy viruses by mathematically determining the frequencies at which they can be shaken to death. All objects have resonant frequencies at which they naturally vibrate. But too much vibration can destroy the object. Recent experiments have shown that laser pulses tuned to the right frequency can kill certain viruses. However, at present, locating these resonant frequencies is a trial and error task. Researchers are hard at work developing methods to calculate the vibrational motion of every atom in a virus shell. From this, they can determine the lowest resonant frequencies. For example, the satellite tobacco necrosis virus resonates strongly around 60 Gigahertz (60 billion cycles per second). It is unlikely that viruses will be able to develop resistance to mechanical shaking, as they do to drugs. Mercola's comment includes: Therefore, killing viruses through the use of resonant frequencies that stresses the cell to the point of breaking its shell is certainly within the realm of reality. He goes on to invite readers to join his exclusive inner circle. Proposed New Chinese Proverb tagline : Will those preparing to accept that frequencies can interfere with pathogens please step on the escalator and catch up with those who have been doing it for quite some time. Refinements on new tagline invited. Newses Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.