Guest guest Posted February 3, 1999 Report Share Posted February 3, 1999 The Brachman study used one vaccine available in the late 50s. The FDA licensed another vaccine which used a different nonvirulent anthrax strain, using the Brachman data generated with the earlier vaccine. (Go figure.) The Ames strain is a virulent strain not used to make vaccines but used to test vaccine effectiveness. The GAO study is not estimated to be out until the early spring. Kaufman posted a description of the two vaccines in Pro-MED a year ago. -- Meryl Nass, M.D. Parkview Hospital, Brunswick, Maine 04011 email mnass@... phone (207) 865-0875 fax (207) 865-6975 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 1999 Report Share Posted February 3, 1999 The most comon line coming out of the leadership in rebuttal to any evidence offered is " that is just stuff he or she got off the internet, how can they know if it is the truth? " No new facts, just a misstrust of that new fangled technology. (no subject) Hi all! I just copied the " only known published journal study " (World Health Org., 1998) of a human anthrax vaccine trial (Brachman et al.,1962). Very interesting study. Seems to me that so many of the test subjects left the experiment (in one way or another) and that it is somewhat inconclusive. My question is this. The " vaccine was supplied by Dr. G.G. and associates of the US Army Chemical Corps, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Md. It was produced by growth of the RI-NP strain. RI-NP is a nonencapsulated, nonproteolytic mutant of the Vollum strain of B. anthracis. " In addition, the vaccine contains " 0.1 per cent aluminum potassium sulfate (alum). " Now, another study done more recently was conducted yet again at Fort Detrick with MDPH-PA in rhesus monkeys " using the Ames strain of aerosolized anthrax. " The current vaccine, anthrax vaccine adsorbed, contains 2.4 mg of AlOH, formaldehyde (not to exceed 0.02%) and benzethonium chloride (0.0025%). Notice for the current vaccine, I have no idea what strain is used to produce it! OK, according to the DOD and FDA, " the vaccine was licensed in 1970 according to a published study (that study being Dr. Brachman's). " The key word here is licensed - which vaccine? The RINP strain, the Ames strain or the anthrax vaccine adsorbed? Are they all considered the same? And if they are all considered the same, how come they performed differently in other tests cited by Dr. Nass? Therefore, what strain is included in the anthrax vaccine adsorbed - it does not say on the package label? And, is this particular vaccine the one that was licenced in 1970? If not, then this leaves us with the fact that the DOD is saying that the anthrax vaccine was indeed licenced in 1970 - but it does not specify which vaccine! Thus, the current vaccine is a " new investigational drug. " Are they relying on our intelligence to figure this one out? Somebody, please help me with this. I cant believe our government is treating their armed forces like this. Their web site on " the anthrax threat " (DOD), questions and answers, fact vs myth, is full of inconsistancies to what I have found.. And indeed on their " history of anthrax- more recently " section, the DoD states " Beginning in 1970 and continuing through today, the anthrax has been routinely administered to ALL PROFESSIONALS who MAY contact anthrax spores occupationally (veterinarians, laboratory workers, livestock handlers, etc.). " This is a blatent lie in accordance to what one list has found! I am outraged, frustrated and worried. Also, Has the GAO published the independent probe on the MBPI anthrax vaccine? It was due out early 1999. Thanks to all of you for your support Traci and York Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 1999 Report Share Posted February 4, 1999 Just wanted you all to see the interneting of groups we are doing to be sure and get information out re anthrax This is just one place we are putting it out to! Read Subj: Sunshine and the U. S. Marines Date: 99-02-03 21:42:14 EST From: BILLPO13 BCC: DSNurse From the Offices of: Sunshine Vet News POW/MIA...You are NOT Forgotten! E-mail Address: BillPo13@... • • * * * * • The news for veterans, their families, friends, and supporters. Input, comments, suggestions and ideas are welcome. If you would like to be removed from the mailing list, simply hit Reply and type " I would like to be removed from your mailing list. " You will be immediately removed. If you know of anyone who would like to be added to the mailing list, please have THEM send me an e-mail requesting to be added. [The picture or image contained in this e-mail cannot be viewed using this version of AOL.] [The picture or image contained in this e-mail cannot be viewed using this version of AOL.] [The picture or image contained in this e- mail cannot be viewed using this version of AOL.] [The picture or image contained in this e-mail cannot be viewed using this version of AOL.] [The picture or image contained in this e-mail cannot be viewed using this version of AOL.] [The picture or image contained in this e-mail cannot be viewed using this version of AOL.] [The picture or image contained in this e-mail cannot be viewed using this version of AOL.] SUPPORT OUR TROOPS! From: DSNurse Via: VET66A Sunshine and the U. S. Marines by Grant Hodgson Former U. S. Marine recruit and Portland resident had no idea what he was entering into when he was volunteered for medical experiments as a new Marine recruit in basic training at the Marine Corps Recruit Depot (MCRD) in San Diego, California in 1978. At MCRD he and several other Marine recruits were inducted into the top secret weapons development and testing programs code-named Sunshine and Whitecoat, catchall programs that tested the effects of radiation and chemical and biological weapons on humans, against federal and international laws that make such experimentation illegal. In 's case, he was to be subjected to various tests, but the most life- threatening was to be a so-called vaccine testing program that was apparently designed to test the efficacy of new vaccines (or Biological Weapons?) on young, healthy military recruits, in complete violation of international laws and treaties that were established in the Nuremberg Trials in Germany after World War II. What and his fellow Marines could have never known was that some of the same Nazi war criminals who escaped prosecution in the Nuremberg Trails with the help of U. S. intelligence agents and Operation Paperclip, a top secret program to relocate Nazi scientists and physicians to America to continue their wartime efforts, would now be in key positions to experiment on them in various research projects sanctioned by the U. S. military and intelligence agencies. For several years Sunshine tested new lethal and nonlethal weapons discovered, in part, by the Nazi scientists who continued their development with the help and cover of the U. S. Government. According to Ernest , President of Contaminated Veterans of America in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 's case is not unique. Over the years tens of thousands of military recruits have been used for questionable and often illegal medical research projects to test new weapons in violation of the Nuremberg Code. says that he inadvertently fell into one of the Sunshine or Whitecoat projects. Although details on this top secret project are sketchy, it appears to have been designed to use young men, primarily military recruits, to test various new weapons. Using the Freedom of Information Act, has amassed official government documents in order to find out why he has been chronically sick ever since his days as a Marine recruit. The most difficult task was to find his medical records. After years of Marine Corps denial that he was ever hospitalized, then that his records were " inadvertently destroyed " . finally found a copy that contained the codes that identified him as a subject for a top secret medical testing program. " I don't want them to do to other recruits what they did to me, states . I almost died, was given a medical discharge, and I have had chronic health problems ever since. I was not receiving any medical help from the Marines or the VA. Although they would carefully examine me, they never offered any explanation or treatment for my condition. It's as if they were just monitoring my condition but doing nothing about it " . A turning point came when saw a broadcast on his local TV station about the Gulf War and its associated medical problems. " I listened carefully to this researcher speak about Gulf War Syndrome and how he and his institute described some of its causes and how they developed new treatments " . The medical researcher, Dr. Garth Nicolson, Chief Scientific Officer of the Institute for Molecular Medicine in Huntington Beach, California, had been working with several hundred veterans with Gulf War Syndrome, or as Nicolson prefers to call it, Gulf War Illnesses. Working with his molecular biologist wife , they discovered that almost one-half of the veterans with Gulf War Syndrome have chronic infections caused by an infectious mycoplasma, a small bacterial-like microorganism that hides inside tissues and reeks havoc throughout the body. Mycoplasma infections, particularly the type found in the vets, Mycoplasma fermentans incognitis, can result in chronic fatigue, aching joints and muscles, memory loss, skin rashes, fevers and other problems. For years no one listened to Nicolsons, but they continued to gather data and publish it in environmental medicine journals. They have been vocal about their methods to diagnose and treat veterans, and this has resulted in Garth Nicolson testifying under oath six times in the last few years to various Presidential, Congressional and Pentagon oversight committees. The press reports and official government testimony grudgingly and slowly gained notice from the Pentagon, and within the last year the Institute received a Department of Defense contract to train military and civilian scientists and physicians on how to find and treat mycoplasmas of the type found in Gulf War Syndrome. One of the members of this team that was trained in California was Dr. Shyh-Ching Lo, a scientist and mycoplasma expert at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Washington D.C. who claims discovery of Mycoplasma fermentans incognitis and even holds a U.S. government patent on this very microorganism. Although for years the VA and military officially denied that a treatment for Gulf War Syndrome existed, at the same time Nicolson was quietly working with doctors within and outside the government to take care of vets with Gulf War Syndrome and the unusual infection that many of them and their family members had contracted. But had never been to the Middle east and had been sick for years before the Gulf War. Since he had many of the same medical problems as the Gulf War vets, contacted Garth Nicolson to see if he might have a similar illness. After sending a blood sample to California, was diagnosed with the same type of infection found in Gulf War Syndrome patients. " In 's case, it appears that he might have received some kind of cocktail injection while he was in the Marines at MCRD in San Diego. He quickly became acutely sick with signs and symptoms similar to those caused by a hemorrhagic fever virus, mainly he was bleeding from various places, and apparently his blood vessels were leaking blood into his tissues causing extreme swelling. He was lucky to live through this episode " . In fact, some of 's fellow recruits did not survive what Nicolson has called the acute phase of his illness. recovered enough to be discharged from the Marines, he returned to Oregon and his illness slowly moved into a new chronic phase with different symptoms similar to what Gulf War veterans are suffering from. Nicolson hypothesized that this second chronic phase of his illness might be caused by the mycoplasma and perhaps other infections. This is why Nicolson thinks that may have been a subject for testing of an infectious cocktail that contained both fast-and slow-acting biological agents. There was also another important parallel with Gulf War Syndrome. During 's stay at the Naval Medical Research Unit in San Diego one of his physicians was Dr. E. Kilpactrick, at the time a U. S. Navy Commander and head of the Naval Medical Research Unit in San Diego. Interestingly, Dr. Kilpactrick is now the number two man in the Pentagon's office that investigates Gulf War Syndrome. " Catch 22! Says . I've checked the signatures, and it is the same Dr. Kilpactrick. He is the source or can lead us to the source, and he is now the head investigator of Gulf War Syndrome. I would like to know what they did to me to make me ill. I was not allowed to question physicians or staff. I was placed under orders of silence for the full period of my medical treatment and thereafter until my discharge. I believed then my life was in danger and still is as a survivor of these inhuman test programs " . Dr. Kilpactrick, now a Navy Captain, was unavailable for comment. Dr. Kilpactrick was the Commanding Officer of Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3 in Cairo, Egypt during the Gulf War and was responsible for identifying Biological Weapons used during the war. Interestingly, the Naval Medical Research Unit in San Diego is a part of the No. 3 unit in Cairo that was headed by Captain Kilpactrick. says that he believes that Dr. Kilpactrick holds many of the clues to his symptoms and the symptoms of those veterans suffering from Gulf War Illnesses. Dr. Kilpactrick recently appeared in a TV interview with the UPN network where he described the Nicolsons work as " an interesting theory " that would take years to confirm. And what does he think about the success that the Institute for Molecular Medicine has had in helping vets overcome Gulf War Syndrome with antibiotic treatments, Dr. Kilpactrick says more research needs to be done. " We shouldn't just rush head long into saying that just because teteracyclines as drugs don’t cause much of a problem, let’s go ahead and just give it to the veterans. When I look at the antibiotics as compounds, these drugs kill a lot of friendly bacteria that live in our bodies " . Garth Nicolson counters with " That's ridiculous! The antibiotics that we have recommended to treat systemic [systemwide] mycoplasmal infections are quite safe and have been in safe use for years at military and VA hospitals. Every antibiotic kills some friendly bacteria. If you closely followed Dr. Kilpactrick's notions, no one would ever be treated with antibiotics " . Last year the Department of Veterans Affairs approved a $12 million clinical trial using the antibiotic doxycycline to treat Gulf War Syndrome patients that have mycoplasma infections at 20 VA medical centers around the country. Nicolson also stated that " We had accumulated enough evidence by 1994 that this [antibiotic] was helping the veterans, and, of course, we tried to go to the VA and tell them that this was helping the veterans, but they just scoffed at us and thought we were crazy. They even issued directives from VA Headquarters in Washington D.C. that Gulf War Illnesses should not be treated with antibiotics, which is absurd, because Gulf War Illness patients could have a variety of secondary conditions that could require antibiotic therapy " . thinks that the reason that Gulf War Syndrome patients with infections are not being treated is the same reason that he was denied treatment. He feels that the Medical Corps has been doing illegal research on military personnel for years, and some of these military physicians do not want their experiments to be tampered with by having subjects treated with antibiotics for agents that may have been given to them during military tests. As Garth Nicolson stresses " This problem will not go away. We are dealing with airborne contagious infections that if left untreated will continue to penetrate into the civilian population " . and Dudley of San Diego learned this the hard way. As civilians, they worked right next to MCRD in San Diego at about the same time that was in training to become a Marine and had extensive contacts with recruits who were sick. Now the Dudleys are sick with the same illness, and they have also been diagnosed with Mycoplasma fermentans infections at the Nicolsons & rsquo; institute. " We were diagnosed with mycoplasma infections and we have been on antibiotics for eighteen months, and we are recovering. In fact, the antibiotics have been the only thing that have helped us recover after years of illness. We have the same type of infection that is found in one-half of the Gulf War veterans who are sick " . The Dudley's claim that the military is responsible for the spread of the illness into the civilian population. U. S. Representative Bob Filner (D-CA) asked this same question of Bernard Rostker, Special Assistant Secretary of Defense for Gulf War Illnesses, during a recent meeting of the U. S. House of Representatives Committee on Veterans & rsquo; Affairs. " Is it possible that any of our troops could have gotten what we call Persian Gulf War Illness from our own inoculations, from our own testing, from our own development of these kinds of weapons, in the Gulf or elsewhere? " . The Pentagon's answer: We are going to need much more research, and it is going to take a long time. For many Gulf War veterans and military recruits that were used for illegal testing, they unfortunately can't wait years for help for themselves and their sick family members. - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: DSNurse Via: VET66A Veterinary Colleges Dear Concerned Service Members and Family Members, An example of why this theme needs to be developed, and the Vet. assertion needs to be debunked is that in the CT ANG we were told that the Cornell Vet School had used this shot for years by our Medical Technician in a briefing to all our personnel to show them the shot was safe and effective. One of our pilots stood up and said, 'Oh yeah - I went to Cornell - and I know the Dean of the Vet. school - and I called him - they do not use this vaccine. " Silence. Now we have lost 25% of our pilot force due to this vaccine policy. Our Commanders were entirely ill equipped to sell it to the troops. Information they gave us was often challenged successfully and proven wrong. They could not answer our questions and were rebuffed by higher HQ's when they tried. In the end, the only justification for this policy was, 'we are implementing DOD policy in the interest of force protection.' I hope we all see an end to this inane policy soon so we can ebb the flow of America's Service Members departing the military in ever increasing numbers. Keep the faith, Capt. 2 | 0 | | 7 3 | Have a good day, Bill P. 2 | 0 | | 7 3 | <A HREF= " http://members.aol.com/BILLPO13/index.html " >Sunshine Vet News</A> <A HREF= " http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/5050/ " >No to USFSPA</A> <A HREF= " aol://1722:vietnam " >Vietnam Veterans Memorial</A> <A HREF= " http://photo2.si.edu/offerings/offerings.html " >Offerings at the Wall </A> <A HREF= " http://www.usmc.mil/ " >MarineLINK</A> <A HREF= " http://www.thefew.com/ " >Marine Guest Book</A> <A HREF= " aol://4344:121.mcokwm.1225766.490800088 " >Korean War Veterans Memorial </A> <A HREF= " http://www.theshop.net/slworley/skelton.html " >'Red Skelton's Pledge of Allegiance</A> <A HREF= " http://hometown.aol.com/vet66a/page/index.htm " >VET66A's page</A> <A HREF= " http://www.va.gov/VA.htm " >Dept of Veterans Affairs</A> <A HREF= " http://www.va.gov/health/elig/ " >Eligibility Reform</A> <A HREF= " http://www.aiipowmia.com/ " >AII POW-MIA</A> <A HREF= " http://members.aol.com/soarngduv/Dpowlink.htm " >Dave Murray's POW/MIA & Vet Links</A> <A HREF= " http://members.aol.com/dstormmom/vetcenter/ " >DS VetCenter</A> <A HREF= " http://www.nashville.net/%7Ebobbyros/ " >Bobby Ross Homepage</A> <A HREF= " http://congress.nw.dc.us/c-span/elecmail.html " > Congressional E-Mail -- C-SPAN</A> <A HREF= " http://www.vvof.org/ " >Vietnam Veterans of Florida</A> <A HREF= " http://www.patiencepress.com/ " >Post Traumatic Gazette Trauma & PTSD Page</A> <A HREF= " http://www.normandy.eb.com/ " >Normandy: 1944</A> <A HREF= " http://yp.bellsouth.com/sites/vmpc/ " >S. Florida VMPC</A> <A HREF= " http://www.vietnamwallsouth.qpg.com/ " >Wall South Foundation</A> | 2 | 0 | | 7 3 | Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 1999 Report Share Posted February 4, 1999 The GAO study is NOT out yet. The Shays committee staff says maybe first of next month! DSNurse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 1999 Report Share Posted February 4, 1999 If " they " want to say " it just came from the internet " , well here is my reply. Does the FDA, DoD, WHO and newspapers have any credibility? Where I went to school, professors encouraged us to use the internet for research, but instructed us to be skeptical in our findings if the website was not " official. " As far as I know, the FDA, DoD, WHO and newspapers have " official " web sites. In addition, leaders in the military, particularly the Navy, encourage their enlisted to check out the web site of the DoD for questions and answers regarding the anthrax vaccine. Also, when you have tireless people working towards a common goal, ie. grass roots org., like , you know it is not a hoax. People here spend many hours in their research not only online, but on the phone! So, if you hear that garbage " that is just stuff on the internet " you tell them to talk to some professors, lawmakers, researchers, ect.! Traci bedlam3 wrote: > The most comon line coming out of the leadership in rebuttal to any > evidence offered is " that is just stuff he or she got off the > internet, how can they know if it is the truth? " No new facts, just a > misstrust of that new fangled technology. > > (no subject) > Hi all! > > I just copied the " only known published journal study " > (World Health Org., 1998) of a human anthrax vaccine trial > (Brachman et al.,1962). Very interesting study. Seems to > me that so many of the test subjects left the experiment (in > one way or another) and that it is somewhat inconclusive. > My question is this. The " vaccine was supplied by Dr. G.G. > and associates of the US Army Chemical Corps, Fort > Detrick, Frederick, Md. It was produced by growth of the > RI-NP strain. RI-NP is a nonencapsulated, nonproteolytic > mutant of the Vollum strain of B. anthracis. " In addition, > the vaccine contains " 0.1 per cent aluminum potassium > sulfate (alum). " Now, another study done more recently was > conducted yet again at Fort Detrick with MDPH-PA in rhesus > monkeys " using the Ames strain of aerosolized anthrax. " The > current vaccine, anthrax vaccine adsorbed, contains 2.4 mg > of AlOH, formaldehyde (not to exceed 0.02%) and benzethonium > chloride (0.0025%). Notice for the current vaccine, I have > no idea what strain is used to produce it! > > OK, according to the DOD and FDA, " the vaccine was licensed > in 1970 according to a published study (that study being Dr. > Brachman's). " The key word here is licensed - which > vaccine? The RINP strain, the Ames strain or the anthrax > vaccine adsorbed? Are they all considered the same? And if > they are all considered the same, how come they performed > differently in other tests cited by Dr. Nass? Therefore, > what strain is included in the anthrax vaccine adsorbed - it > does not say on the package label? And, is this particular > vaccine the one that was licenced in 1970? If not, then > this leaves us with the fact that the DOD is saying that the > anthrax vaccine was indeed licenced in 1970 - but it does > not specify which vaccine! Thus, the current vaccine is a > " new investigational drug. " Are they relying on our > intelligence to figure this one out? > > Somebody, please help me with this. I cant believe our > government is treating their armed forces like this. Their > web site on " the anthrax threat " (DOD), questions and > answers, fact vs myth, is full of inconsistancies to what I > have found.. And indeed on their " history of anthrax- more > recently " section, the DoD states " Beginning in 1970 and > continuing through today, the anthrax has been routinely > administered to ALL PROFESSIONALS who MAY contact anthrax > spores occupationally (veterinarians, laboratory workers, > livestock handlers, etc.). " This is a blatent lie in > accordance to what one list has found! I am > outraged, frustrated and worried. > > Also, Has the GAO published the independent probe on the > MBPI anthrax vaccine? It was due out early 1999. > > Thanks to all of you for your support > > Traci and York > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 1999 Report Share Posted February 4, 1999 Dr. Nass: Where can I obtain a copy of Kaufman's description of the two vaccines in Pro-MED? Also, the V770 strain used to produce the current vaccine (according to the WHO), is that really the strain that was used when the human anthrax vaccine was approved in 1970. And, can MBPI (now Biocorp or port) produce the vaccine with any strain it wants to? Does it matter which strain is used? Is it all the same? Information on the strain used to produce the current human vaccine is available. Would the military actually use the same strain to produce the vaccine? I am sure Iraqi intelligence would pick up on that one real quick. I had no problem obtaining " the current strain used to produce the human anthrax vaccine in the US. " You think the current strain being used to produce the vaccine is classified? And if so, how do they know its effectiveness and is that particular strain " approved or licensed " by the FDA? Thank you for your time, Traci Meryl Nass wrote: > From: Meryl Nass <mnass@...> > > The Brachman study used one vaccine available in the late 50s. The FDA > licensed another vaccine which used a different nonvirulent anthrax > strain, using the Brachman data generated with the earlier vaccine. (Go > figure.) The Ames strain is a virulent strain not used to make vaccines > but used to test vaccine effectiveness. > > The GAO study is not estimated to be out until the early spring. > > Kaufman posted a description of the two vaccines in Pro-MED a year ago. > -- > Meryl Nass, M.D. > Parkview Hospital, Brunswick, Maine 04011 > email mnass@... > phone (207) 865-0875 > fax (207) 865-6975 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 1999 Report Share Posted February 4, 1999 To all, please post .... this is a possible solution for our military personnel. Thank you Young for your assistance and computer knowledge. And to Lori Greenleaf, and all others who have the courage to present facts, and not speculation. This most controversial problem, does have a solution, in the interim, while permanent long lasting measures are awaited... Joe. See: <A HREF= " http://members.aol.com/spur317b/joe-poe.html " >Subject: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE " ANTHRAX " </A> ------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 1999 Report Share Posted February 5, 1999 ---------- From: Eddington@... DAVID.GREENLEAF@...; TRempfer@... Cc: mnass@...; KERNLHANDY@... Subject: (no subject) Date: Friday, February 05, 1999 6:58 AM The following Washington Post piece appeared yesterday. Check out the last item...this was buried in the back of the newspaper. Army to Discuss Digging For WWI Gas Canisters By Steve Vogel Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, February 4, 1999; Page J03 The Army's plans to dig for canisters of mustard or other poisonous agents left over from World War I in Northwest Washington are to be unveiled at a meeting tonight, with many nervous neighbors expected to attend. Officials from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District, will be on hand at Sibley Memorial Hospital to explain their plan to search for canisters they believe may be buried underneath an ornamental garden in the back yard of the Korean ambassador's residence on Glenbrook Road in the Spring Valley neighborhood. What they'll find nobody knows, but the planned excavation puts the spotlight on a little-known but fascinating chapter in the Washington area's military history: the American University Experiment Station. When America entered World War I in 1917, U.S. leaders feared the nation's military was utterly unprepared for mustard gas, a horrible new weapon that had been introduced to the battlefield at Ypres in 1915 and was to cause 400,000 casualties during the war. Trustees at American University, which was then a largely undeveloped 90-acre tract of land, offered their campus to the government to use for military preparations. Part of the site became an engineer camp where more than 100,000 troops on their way to Europe trained for gas warfare. The rest was home to the experiment station, where 1,200 chemists and engineers studied chemical weapons. The Army embarked on a large-scale construction program on the campus and other adjoining properties it leased, eventually building about 164 structures and earthworks, including shacks, bomb pits, trenches, a munitions plant and a mustard shed. Clouds of mustard and other gases were released on animals, including dogs, goats, cats, rabbits and guinea pigs. Changing of the Brass at s s Air Force Base, where a new base commander arrived last month, has a new senior enlisted man as well. Command Chief Master Sgt. Francis R. Estevez will serve as the liaison between enlisted personnel at the Prince 's County installation and the new base commander, Brig. Gen. Hawkins. Estevez, 40, a native of the Dominican Republic who was raised in New York City, did not plan on a military career early in his life. " I wasn't supposed to be in the Air Force, " he told the base newspaper. " My first introduction to the military was Gomer Pyle. " Meanwhile, at the Marine Barracks in Southeast Washington, the new color sergeant of the Marine Corps officially took his post at a ceremony Jan. 21. Sgt. D. , of Union City, Tenn., became the Corps' 27th color sergeant, a position that requires him to carry the presidential color at all White House state functions, as well as to head the color guard section, which participates in more than 1,000 ceremonies annually. To reach this position, had to pass a number of stringent tests, not the least of which was that he stand at least 6 feet, 4 inches tall. Balking at Anthrax Shots What do members of the Connecticut National Guard know about anthrax shots that their counterparts in the land Guard don't know? Or is it the other way around? Officials with the land Air National Guard note with pride that none of the roughly 400 airmen it is deploying to Kuwait to help enforce the " no-fly " zone over Iraq have refused to get the anthrax vaccination, which is intended to protect troops from a biological weapon believed to be harbored by Saddam Hussein. By contrast, eight of 35 pilots from a Connecticut Air National Guard A-10 squadron also deploying to Kuwait refused to take the shot--a rather stunning refusal rate of 23 percent. Suspicions within the military about what side effects the vaccination might carry have festered since 1997, when Defense Secretary S. Cohen ordered everyone in the U.S. military to receive the shot. The refusal by the Connecticut pilots is one of the more telling incidents about how high that suspicion remains in some circles. Some " see it clearly as a threat to their health, " said Col. Walt Burns, commander of the Connecticut air wing involved. Those who refused the shot have been grounded and have been asked to resign, he added. Thus far, about 250 members of the land Guard's 104th Fighter Squadron have deployed with A-10 Thunderbolts to Kuwait, with most of the remainder slated to leave in mid-February. Military Matters appears every other Thursday. Steve Vogel can be reached at vogels@... in e-mail. © Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company ---------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 1999 Report Share Posted February 5, 1999 Hi All, I just saw a story on the news about People Magazine running a story on Chelsea Clinton. They said the Pres. & Mrs. Clinton asked them not to run it but they went ahead. Sounds like they will run a story no matter who's toes they step on! How about us writing People? We have Meck, Jim Green, Jeff Betterdorf and the Connectticut Pilots!! We should also include M. Kipling of Canada. It says People Online is available at Keyword: People. I will try to find a snail-mail address also. Graves Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 1999 Report Share Posted February 5, 1999 Hi, Get me an address...and I will write them...email and snail mail if possible. I will send a copy of whatever to the group so all will know what was sent. I sincerely hope that all of you understand my position...I'm retired military...and quite ill from this GWS/GWI whatever you want to call it... I can-not legally tell someone to refuse the vaccine (goes against my military background---also it presents sedition to mutiny)....but these kids have my moral support...and my prayers... I do support actions such as the proposed Drugs and Informed Consent Act we tried to push through congress last summer.(stop using the military as guinea pigs)...we need to get this onto the floor in Congress again and see it through....The only way to stop this train...is via the legal channals...take it to the Govt to intervene...I know that may sound off the wall....but believe me, it can be done. Sincerely, USMCMomm1@... wrote: > From: USMCMomm1@... > > Hi All, > I just saw a story on the news about People Magazine running a story on > Chelsea Clinton. They said the Pres. & Mrs. Clinton asked them not to run it > but they went ahead. > Sounds like they will run a story no matter who's toes they step on! > How about us writing People? We have Meck, Jim Green, Jeff Betterdorf > and the Connectticut Pilots!! We should also include M. Kipling of Canada. > It says People Online is available at Keyword: People. > I will try to find a snail-mail address also. > Graves > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 1999 Report Share Posted February 5, 1999 NADA, never asked for any of the three. (no subject) From: Rob & Traci York <robertyork@...> Hi again, Anyone who has taken the anthrax vaccine: DID YOU SIGN A PEICE OF PAPER before you took the vaccine? If so, this could be of importance!!!! Please let me know what you signed!!!! Traci Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 1999 Report Share Posted February 7, 1999 Rob & Traci York wrote: > > From: Rob & Traci York <robertyork@...> > > Hi again, > > Anyone who has taken the anthrax vaccine: DID YOU SIGN A PEICE OF PAPER > before you took the vaccine? If so, this could be of importance!!!! > Please let me know what you signed!!!! > > Traci > My son went ahead and took the shot. He said he had to sign and date a statement that he had read the phamphlet about Anthrax. He was not even given the phamphlet to read. Sharon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 1999 Report Share Posted February 8, 1999 Please do use background colors on email especially datk ones that are hard to read! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 1999 Report Share Posted February 10, 1999 No what I was saying refer to what they are saying here in Fed regs and direct a FOIA to see what you uncover. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 1999 Report Share Posted February 10, 1999 OK, thanks! Traci DSNurse@... wrote: > From: DSNurse@... > > No what I was saying refer to what they are saying here in Fed regs and direct > a FOIA to see what you uncover. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 1999 Report Share Posted February 26, 1999 Preparing For Invisible Killers Smallpox and Anthrax Could Be Put to Work in Biological Warfare (Washington Post, February 23, 1999, Health Section) Even though the chances of a terrorist release of smallpox or anthrax in the United States is small, the nation's public health community must be ready for the possibility, Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala told a Washington conference on the subject last week. She said increased government funding is needed to train health workers and produce vaccines and drugs to combat those and more conventional biological weapons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 1999 Report Share Posted February 26, 1999 Anthrax Veteran Claims Vaccine 'no Big Deal' By Pfc. Cantu MARINE CORPS AIR STATION YUMA, Ariz. (Feb 4) -- As a boy growing up on a cattle ranch in , Idaho, 9-year-old Mark A. would often watch his father, a veterinarian, give their cattle a variety of shots to protect them from various diseases. While his father took the time to protect his cattle, he also vaccinated his family against the fatal Anthrax bacteria common to the livestock industry. That boy, now a Marine with Marine Aviation Logistics Squadron-13, rubbed his arm and dashed off to explore the ranch, forgetting all about the shot. When Staff Sgt. Mark A. , MALS-13's substance abuse counselor, told his mother recently that he was to get the Anthrax vaccination she reminded him that he had already received the shot as a boy. As far as is concerned, the reservations some service members have about the shot are unfounded. " I'm still here. I don't have any cancer. I'm not dying. It doesn't cause sterility. And that's a fact - I have five children, " said . " It's really no big deal. " Since Secretary of Defense Cohen ordered all military personnel to receive the Anthrax vaccination, controversy and fears have risen about the vaccine's safety. Those concerns and fears are fueled by unsubstantiated reports posted on the Internet or put forth by groups with their own agenda. The vaccine was licensed by the Food and Drug Administration in 1970 after years of extensive scientific experiments and tests which yielded no conclusive evidence that the vaccine causes long-term side effects or health problems. The vaccine has been administered to countless veterinarians, laboratory workers and livestock workers for more than 20 years. Even Cohen and the Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. C. Krulak received the vaccination. It has been 34 years since received his first Anthrax shot, long enough to prove to him that there are no long-term effects to worry about. Not only is healthy and " very fertile, " his entire family has received the vaccinations and are just as healthy. " All my brothers and sisters are married and have children. We all have 10 toes and 10 fingers, " said . He said he has never heard of any health problems with any of them. While the deadly Bacillus Anthracis bacteria has been mostly eradicated in the United States, military members are more likely to face a form of the disease produced by hostile countries. Inhalation Anthrax is a man-made biological weapon with the same horrible symptoms as the form that effects livestock, said Lt. Cmdr. Heins, Marine Aircraft Group-13 group surgeon. According to Heins, within the first 24 hours of being exposed to Anthrax, the victim might develop a slight fever, muscle pains, cough, chest pains and malaise (not wanting to do anything). This initial phase is usually mistaken as a common virus, which makes the early diagnosis and treatment of Anthrax virtually impossible. Sometimes this initial phase is followed by a brief recovery period. The onset of worse symptoms will begin within 24 hours and includes shortness of breath, wheezing caused by increased difficulty in breathing, and internal bleeding that may flood the lungs, esophagus and the brain. At that point the victim may begin to cough-up blood and to bleed from the ears, nose and the eyes. The bleeding causes the victim to turn blue or black in color. Sweating, a swelling of the chest area, seizures and severe shock from blood loss also occur before the victim ultimately dies. " It's a horrible death, " said Heins. " The victim's final agonizing days may be worse than anything he or she has ever experienced ... and it's 100 percent fatal. " Other than a gas mask, a person's only real protection against Anthrax is prior vaccination. " We call it our biological flak jacket, " said Heins. " Just like a flak jacket protects us from bullets, the vaccine protects us from Anthrax. " Heins said there is no reason to fear this vaccine. " The Anthrax vaccination is no different from any of the other vaccinations we get, " said Heins. While has no reservations about the vaccine, he understands why people have concerns. " We as Marines today are being told all of a sudden here's a new shot that we have to get and that's where all the fear comes in, " said . will be retiring from the Marine Corps in December and his plans may include returning to Idaho and the way of life in which he was raised. And just as his daddy did for him on that small cattle ranch more than 30 years ago, said he plans to protect his own family. " I'm going to get it, my children are going to get it and my wife is going to get it, " said . " I truly believe in my heart that it's a good thing. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 1999 Report Share Posted February 26, 1999 Alright, well, I'm gonna do my best, from my knowledge, to rip this article apart, and please let me know if I am incorrect in saying anything. Anthrax Veteran Claims Vaccine 'no Big Deal' By Pfc. Cantu MARINE CORPS AIR STATION YUMA, Ariz. (Feb 4) -- As a boy growing up on a cattle ranch in , Idaho, 9-year-old Mark A. would often watch his father, a veterinarian, give their cattle a variety of shots to protect them from various diseases. While his father took the time to protect his cattle, he also vaccinated his family against the fatal Anthrax bacteria common to the livestock industry. That boy, now a Marine with Marine Aviation Logistics Squadron-13, rubbed his arm and dashed off to explore the ranch, forgetting all about the shot. When Staff Sgt. Mark A. , MALS-13's substance abuse counselor, told his mother recently that he was to get the Anthrax vaccination she reminded him that he had already received the shot as a boy. As far as is concerned, the reservations some service members have about the shot are unfounded. - Even though we have government documents that prove there are problems!! " I'm still here. I don't have any cancer. I'm not dying. It doesn't cause sterility. And that's a fact - I have five children, " said . " It's really no big deal. " - He doesn't have any problems YET!!! Since Secretary of Defense Cohen ordered all military personnel to receive the Anthrax vaccination, controversy and fears have risen about the vaccine's safety. Those concerns and fears are fueled by unsubstantiated - Again, what about our documents?? reports posted on the Internet - What about government reports posted on the Internet??? or put forth by groups with their own agenda. The vaccine was licensed by the Food and Drug Administration in 1970 after years of extensive scientific experiments and tests which yielded no conclusive evidence that the vaccine causes long-term side effects or health problems. - Where is the conclusive evidence??? I haven't seen it. And is it the same vaccine used today that was approved by the FDA??? I doubt it. The vaccine has been administered to countless veterinarians, laboratory workers and livestock workers for more than 20 years. - Where are those documents?? Even Cohen and the Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. C. Krulak received the vaccination. - So?? What does that prove?? It has been 34 years since received his first Anthrax shot, long enough to prove to him that there are no long-term effects to worry about. Not only is healthy and " very fertile, " his entire family has received the vaccinations and are just as healthy. - Yeah, but what about the rest of his life?? " All my brothers and sisters are married and have children. We all have 10 toes and 10 fingers, " said . He said he has never heard of any health problems with any of them. - Again, he should have stressed YET. While the deadly Bacillus Anthracis bacteria has been mostly eradicated in the United States, military members are more likely to face a form of the disease produced by hostile countries. - But the threat from hostile countries has been around forever Inhalation Anthrax is a man-made biological weapon with the same horrible symptoms as the form that effects livestock, said Lt. Cmdr. Heins, Marine Aircraft Group-13 group surgeon. According to Heins, within the first 24 hours of being exposed to Anthrax, the victim might develop a slight fever, muscle pains, cough, chest pains and malaise (not wanting to do anything). This initial phase is usually mistaken as a common virus, which makes the early diagnosis and treatment of Anthrax virtually impossible. Sometimes this initial phase is followed by a brief recovery period. - What about the side-effects associated with the vaccine?? Gullian-Barre Syndrome, etc. The onset of worse symptoms will begin within 24 hours and includes shortness of breath, wheezing caused by increased difficulty in breathing, and internal bleeding that may flood the lungs, esophagus and the brain. At that point the victim may begin to cough-up blood and to bleed from the ears, nose and the eyes. The bleeding causes the victim to turn blue or black in color. Sweating, a swelling of the chest area, seizures and severe shock from blood loss also occur before the victim ultimately dies. " It's a horrible death, " said Heins. " The victim's final agonizing days may be worse than anything he or she has ever experienced ... and it's 100 percent fatal. " - I'd rather have a quick 4 day death, than a slow debilitating death, like the one that could be associated with the vaccine. Other than a gas mask, a person's only real protection against Anthrax is prior vaccination. - Aren't they forgetting about antibiotics?? " We call it our biological flak jacket, " said Heins. " Just like a flak jacket protects us from bullets, the vaccine protects us from Anthrax. " - Yeah, that is assuming that the enemy is using the Ames strain, right?? Heins said there is no reason to fear this vaccine. - Yeah, sure. " The Anthrax vaccination is no different from any of the other vaccinations we get, " said Heins. - So maybe we should refuse those too. While has no reservations about the vaccine, he understands why people have concerns. " We as Marines today are being told all of a sudden here's a new shot that we have to get and that's where all the fear comes in, " said . - No, the fear comes in when we have found proof that a myriad of problems exist with the vaccine. will be retiring from the Marine Corps in December and his plans may include returning to Idaho and the way of life in which he was raised. And just as his daddy did for him on that small cattle ranch more than 30 years ago, said he plans to protect his own family. - Well, good luck, I don't know how his family will be in the future, but I know mine will be fine. " I'm going to get it, my children are going to get it and my wife is going to get it, " said . " I truly believe in my heart that it's a good thing. " - Maybe he should recheck his heart?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 1999 Report Share Posted February 26, 1999 Gees I am only posting what I find so you all can know Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 1999 Report Share Posted February 26, 1999 Ok I'll play. If he took his first anthrax shot 34 years ago what was he taking. This shot was only licensed in 1970's right? Let's see 99 minus 34 equals 65 right, or is this some new kind of math that only the DoD understands. Come on folks if you are going to write BS at least don't leave holes in it big enough to cruise a nuclear carrier through. Something smells to me. On the other hand I'm only reading a story right. Re: (no subject) From: Bbur364@... Alright, well, I'm gonna do my best, from my knowledge, to rip this article apart, and please let me know if I am incorrect in saying anything. Anthrax Veteran Claims Vaccine 'no Big Deal' By Pfc. Cantu MARINE CORPS AIR STATION YUMA, Ariz. (Feb 4) -- As a boy growing up on a cattle ranch in , Idaho, 9-year-old Mark A. would often watch his father, a veterinarian, give their cattle a variety of shots to protect them from various diseases. While his father took the time to protect his cattle, he also vaccinated his family against the fatal Anthrax bacteria common to the livestock industry. That boy, now a Marine with Marine Aviation Logistics Squadron-13, rubbed his arm and dashed off to explore the ranch, forgetting all about the shot.... " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 1999 Report Share Posted February 26, 1999 Ok I'll play. If he took his first anthrax shot 34 years ago what was he taking. This shot was only licensed in 1970's right? Let's see 99 minus 34 equals 65 right, or is this some new kind of math that only the DoD understands. Come on folks if you are going to write BS at least don't leave holes in it big enough to cruise a nuclear carrier through. Something smells to me. On the other hand I'm only reading a story right. Re: (no subject) From: Bbur364@... Alright, well, I'm gonna do my best, from my knowledge, to rip this article apart, and please let me know if I am incorrect in saying anything. Anthrax Veteran Claims Vaccine 'no Big Deal' By Pfc. Cantu MARINE CORPS AIR STATION YUMA, Ariz. (Feb 4) -- As a boy growing up on a cattle ranch in , Idaho, 9-year-old Mark A. would often watch his father, a veterinarian, give their cattle a variety of shots to protect them from various diseases. While his father took the time to protect his cattle, he also vaccinated his family against the fatal Anthrax bacteria common to the livestock industry. That boy, now a Marine with Marine Aviation Logistics Squadron-13, rubbed his arm and dashed off to explore the ranch, forgetting all about the shot.... " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 1999 Report Share Posted February 27, 1999 I wasn't meaning anything towards you DSNurse, by any means, I was just merely ripping it to shreds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 1999 Report Share Posted February 27, 1999 I read a report put out by Great Britain regarding the anthrax vaccine, and they claim most vaccines have a two year shelf life. Does anyone know if that is true? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 1999 Report Share Posted February 27, 1999 Is this shot that this guy got 34 YEARS ago, that his dad gave to the ANIMALS and to his family the same vaccine that military members are getting today? ---DSNurse@... wrote: > > Anthrax Veteran Claims Vaccine 'no Big Deal' > By Pfc. Cantu > MARINE CORPS AIR STATION YUMA, Ariz. (Feb 4) -- As a boy growing up on a > cattle ranch in , Idaho, 9-year-old Mark A. would often watch > his father, a veterinarian, give their cattle a variety of shots to protect > them from various diseases. While his father took the time to protect his > cattle, he also vaccinated his family against the fatal Anthrax bacteria > common to the livestock industry. That boy, now a Marine with Marine Aviation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 1999 Report Share Posted February 27, 1999 Hello, here!! Has anyone in the govt ever heard of another HUMAN BEINGS rights??? I guess we just don't count: our opinions, our own bodies... what is this world coming to? I thought the U.S. stood for freedom of CHOICE!!! i guess a lot of us were wrong on that one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.