Re: Latest Court-Martial News

[Guest guest]

Doesn't this just figure from the military? Issues of safety, efficacy and

necessity are considered irrelevant??!!!!! It's nice to know how little the

soldier's health means to them.

<< Dr. Nass has not been permitted to testify as all issues relating to the

safety, efficacy and necessity of the vaccine have been ruled irrelevant. >>

[Guest guest]

Unfortunately, where the USMJ is usually better than the civilian legal

system, it is even more limited by the scope of the judicial view. Here the

trial is seen as a violation of of one regulation - failure to follow a

" legal order " . That sole charge is the fact at issue. It would be easier

to attack the " legality of the order " than attempt a jury nullification

{which works in a civilian jury system}.

I have been trying to follow the Legality Issue by researching the Nuremberg

Code as to whether or not it was a matter that was voted on by the Senate in

a Treaty form or put into effect by Executive Order. If adopted by the

treaty process, then, the adopted Nuremberg Code becomes Federal Law with

power and strength over domestically pass local , state, or enacted federal

law.

There in lies the real test within the USMJ and there is where it should be

attacked in a Military Law system.

Jon B. -

Re: Latest Court-Martial News

>From: Randice1@...

>

>

>Doesn't this just figure from the military? Issues of safety, efficacy and

>necessity are considered irrelevant??!!!!! It's nice to know how little

the

>soldier's health means to them.

>

><< Dr. Nass has not been permitted to testify as all issues relating to the

> safety, efficacy and necessity of the vaccine have been ruled irrelevant.

>>

[Guest guest]

Unfortunately, where the USMJ is usually better than the civilian legal

system, it is even more limited by the scope of the judicial view. Here the

trial is seen as a violation of of one regulation - failure to follow a

" legal order " . That sole charge is the fact at issue. It would be easier

to attack the " legality of the order " than attempt a jury nullification

{which works in a civilian jury system}.

I have been trying to follow the Legality Issue by researching the Nuremberg

Code as to whether or not it was a matter that was voted on by the Senate in

a Treaty form or put into effect by Executive Order. If adopted by the

treaty process, then, the adopted Nuremberg Code becomes Federal Law with

power and strength over domestically pass local , state, or enacted federal

law.

There in lies the real test within the USMJ and there is where it should be

attacked in a Military Law system.

Jon B. -

Re: Latest Court-Martial News

>From: Randice1@...

>

>

>Doesn't this just figure from the military? Issues of safety, efficacy and

>necessity are considered irrelevant??!!!!! It's nice to know how little

the

>soldier's health means to them.

>

><< Dr. Nass has not been permitted to testify as all issues relating to the

> safety, efficacy and necessity of the vaccine have been ruled irrelevant.

>>

[Guest guest]

Jon,

Your post sparked my memory - I wonder whether The Belmont Report would be

helpful to you. This follows the principles of the Nuremburg Code and was

signed into law July 12, 1974. You can find the Belmont Report at:

http://helix.nih.gov:8001/ohsr/mpa/belmont.phtml

I hope this helps.

Sincerely,

Diodati