Guest guest Posted June 22, 1999 Report Share Posted June 22, 1999 To All, How can it be argued that these outstanding young men and women who refuse this vaccination are refusing a " Lawful Order " ? It would seem to me that the entire issue revolves around whether or not the order is in fact lawful. How can a refusal by anyone to be injected with experimental drugs be lawful. Since the " new and revised " vaccine was not the one that was licenced by the FDA in 1970, shouldn't the new vaccine be submitted for licencing? Wouldn't it stand to reason that the new and revised vaccine is in fact not licenced, therefore experimental? Help me out. What am I missing here? Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.