Guest guest Posted September 4, 1999 Report Share Posted September 4, 1999 Neither am I Randi (a legal scout that is), however maybe you can find a few clues in the UCMJ. I've book marked a link below. You can surf the whole UCMJ at the link. In addition, the rules could probably be expanded somewhat for you because of your technician status. Maybe you know a few officers that may fit some of these profiles? http://jaglink.jag.af.mil/ucmj.htm SUBCHAPTER X. PUNITIVE ARTICLES 934. ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE 938. ART. 138. COMPLAINTS OF WRONGS SUBCHAPTER X. PUNITIVE ARTICLES 907. ART. 107. FALSE STATEMENTS SUBCHAPTER X. PUNITIVE ARTICLES 931. ART. 131. PERJURY jfsorg@... (no subject) From: Randice1@... Hello List, I'm looking for some answers: I read what Tx had to send on Aug 15th titled: Legal Considerations Within the Vaccine Unfortunately, I'm not a legal scout, so some of this I found confusing. If anyone here who is a legal scout can answer a question, I'd be greatly appreciated: If someone has a recorded systemic reaction to the anthrax vaccine, and they are forced to get another one, what are the recourses? If what I have heard is correct, the military is not exempt from malpractice are they? If not, are they exempt from negligence? If they are not exempt from either, how far can this be taken? What I'm referring to is: how far up the chain can people be held accountable either for malpractice or negligence, pending that all are aware of the systemic reaction. Can someone help me out, please? Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.