Re: New licensing change for anthrax vaccine

[Guest guest]

I agree, 'marginally less bad'. But changes don't make sense, only

elimination of vaccines does. Any vaccinations, in any manner of

injection, in any interval are extremely damaging to the whole person.

Affects are not measurable and often ignored in standard testing.

Most of the affects are so deep in the person 'research' is unable to

tie it together anyway.

Liz

Classical Homeopath

>

> Both changes make scientific sense. There are fewer local (but equal

> systemic) reactions when you give the vaccine deeper into muscle.

>

> Skipping the 2 week dose is smarter on all counts: it did not yield

> appreciable benefit in terms of increased antibody levels, makes

> administration of vaccine conform with a reservist schedule, and gives

> the recipient less toxic material to process.

>

> It may slightly decrease the rate of serious adverse effects, but

> there is no evidence yet proving this. The vaccine remains highly

> reactive, and its protection in the event of inhaled anthrax exposure

> remains very open to question. These two changes are likely to make

> it marginally less bad for recipients.

>

> Meryl

>

> Meryl Nass, MD

> Mount Desert Island Hospital

> Bar Harbor, Maine 04609

> W 207 288-5081 ext. 1220

> C 207 522-5229

> H 207 244-9165

> pager 207 818-0708

> http://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com

> http://www.anthraxvaccine.org

>

>

>

>

>

>