THE TRUTH BEHIND AIDS PT 13 (WHAT WE REALY NEED TO KNOW)

[Guest guest]

cont'd from part 12

"In Canada the vast majority of AIDS cases have occurred in homosexual-bisexual men living in the largest urban areas. Brazil has accounted for the second highest international toll of reported AIDS cases, far and away the highest per capita incidence in Latin America. Sao o and Rio de Janeiro are two of the few places where

homosexuality is tolerated and practiced openly, with the immediate result that Brazil's reported AIDS cases are concentrated in the large gay communities of these two cities." In a report dated October 16, 1986, Drs. Curran and Mason of the Centers for Disease Control stated that

three in thirty homosexual males between the ages of twenty and fifty were infected with the AIDS virus: "In California, New Jersey, Texas and Florida, the figure was 1 in 9 homosexual males between the ages

of 30 and 39. Homosexual transmission accounts for 78 percent of U.S. cases, but this figure increases to 93 percent when combined with drug abusers." Homosexual promiscuity—and the unique susceptibility of certain homosexual activities—and the gravely unsanitary conditions and urban crowding in African cities were undoubtedly factors in the spread

of the virus. But that does not account for the massive outbreaks that occurred in rural tribal areas, which in Kenya, Uganda and Zaire, wiped out the population—all age groups—of whole villages and towns,

where there was much less crowding and sanitary conditions were better. The AIDS virus in Africa was not caused by increased heterosexual activity; the very idea is preposterous. Why would an increase in

heterosexual activity spread an epidemic that was confined to homosexuals and drug abusers in Western countries? But their scapegoat strategy worked. A portrayal emerged in which the blame for AIDS was laid squarely upon African heterosexuals who moved to the city and drug abusers and gay communities in the West. Gays became the whipping boy of the world. This was intended to reassure the general population that if one were not homosexual or an intravenous drug abuser, there was no need to fear infection with the AIDS virus. The media bought the story and passed it on to the public. Witness this account in the Los Angeles Times on August 8, 1987: "In the urban areas of the United States, Canada, Western Europe, Australia, Brazil and Mexico, the AIDS virus is

usually transmitted through male homosexual contact (or to a considerably lesser degree) by intravenous drug users who share contaminated needles and syringes. There is relatively little heterosexual transmission of AIDS virus in these countries." Totally missing from the CDC and JAMA conclusions is the answer to the most important question: Where had the AIDS virus come from ? Just try to get that answer from them. Like the curate's egg, parts of the CDC information are good, but parts are very bad. Take the reference to Brazil. Certainly Sao o and Rio de Janeiro have a large gay presence, but to imply, as CDC did, that gays in these two cities caused an epidemic of AIDS to sweep Brazil to its furthest corners—even remote villages along the

Amazon—defies logic and common sense. What those remote villages in Brazil and Africa shared in common was not a hedonistic gay lifestyle; what they shared in common was that they'd all been vaccinated against smallpox by the World Health Organization. Here's the truth about the spread of the AIDS epidemic: Following successful experiments conducted against Zaire, AIDS was deliberately introduced into Africa. Because it has the largest black population outside Africa, Brazil was then targeted. Then came the Haitian connection—to begin the destruction of

the homosexual community in America.The destruction of the homosexual community has created one of the most dangerous myths we face about AIDS: that it is primarily transmitted by sexual contact. AIDS is not an "ordinary" venereal disease; a sort of deadly gonorrhea. AIDS is a blood-borne virus. As Dr. Benson of UCLA says, "blood is

the major avenue of contamination."

Bostam

[Guest guest]

cont'd from part 12

"In Canada the vast majority of AIDS cases have occurred in homosexual-bisexual men living in the largest urban areas. Brazil has accounted for the second highest international toll of reported AIDS cases, far and away the highest per capita incidence in Latin America. Sao o and Rio de Janeiro are two of the few places where

homosexuality is tolerated and practiced openly, with the immediate result that Brazil's reported AIDS cases are concentrated in the large gay communities of these two cities." In a report dated October 16, 1986, Drs. Curran and Mason of the Centers for Disease Control stated that

three in thirty homosexual males between the ages of twenty and fifty were infected with the AIDS virus: "In California, New Jersey, Texas and Florida, the figure was 1 in 9 homosexual males between the ages

of 30 and 39. Homosexual transmission accounts for 78 percent of U.S. cases, but this figure increases to 93 percent when combined with drug abusers." Homosexual promiscuity—and the unique susceptibility of certain homosexual activities—and the gravely unsanitary conditions and urban crowding in African cities were undoubtedly factors in the spread

of the virus. But that does not account for the massive outbreaks that occurred in rural tribal areas, which in Kenya, Uganda and Zaire, wiped out the population—all age groups—of whole villages and towns,

where there was much less crowding and sanitary conditions were better. The AIDS virus in Africa was not caused by increased heterosexual activity; the very idea is preposterous. Why would an increase in

heterosexual activity spread an epidemic that was confined to homosexuals and drug abusers in Western countries? But their scapegoat strategy worked. A portrayal emerged in which the blame for AIDS was laid squarely upon African heterosexuals who moved to the city and drug abusers and gay communities in the West. Gays became the whipping boy of the world. This was intended to reassure the general population that if one were not homosexual or an intravenous drug abuser, there was no need to fear infection with the AIDS virus. The media bought the story and passed it on to the public. Witness this account in the Los Angeles Times on August 8, 1987: "In the urban areas of the United States, Canada, Western Europe, Australia, Brazil and Mexico, the AIDS virus is

usually transmitted through male homosexual contact (or to a considerably lesser degree) by intravenous drug users who share contaminated needles and syringes. There is relatively little heterosexual transmission of AIDS virus in these countries." Totally missing from the CDC and JAMA conclusions is the answer to the most important question: Where had the AIDS virus come from ? Just try to get that answer from them. Like the curate's egg, parts of the CDC information are good, but parts are very bad. Take the reference to Brazil. Certainly Sao o and Rio de Janeiro have a large gay presence, but to imply, as CDC did, that gays in these two cities caused an epidemic of AIDS to sweep Brazil to its furthest corners—even remote villages along the

Amazon—defies logic and common sense. What those remote villages in Brazil and Africa shared in common was not a hedonistic gay lifestyle; what they shared in common was that they'd all been vaccinated against smallpox by the World Health Organization. Here's the truth about the spread of the AIDS epidemic: Following successful experiments conducted against Zaire, AIDS was deliberately introduced into Africa. Because it has the largest black population outside Africa, Brazil was then targeted. Then came the Haitian connection—to begin the destruction of

the homosexual community in America.The destruction of the homosexual community has created one of the most dangerous myths we face about AIDS: that it is primarily transmitted by sexual contact. AIDS is not an "ordinary" venereal disease; a sort of deadly gonorrhea. AIDS is a blood-borne virus. As Dr. Benson of UCLA says, "blood is

the major avenue of contamination."

Bostam