THE TRUTH BEHIND AIDS PT 12 (FOR THE SLEEPING JOSHUA, TRUTH ALWAYS PREVAILS)

[Guest guest]

Cont'd from part 11,

The official version of how AIDS began is not well known—or

documented. So it is perhaps worth an overview of how this disaster is supposed to have happened. The prevalent cover story for the spread of the AIDS epidemic is that the source of the virus was the African green monkey. To this day, most people believe that AIDS began with infected monkeys biting people. But it would have taken hundreds of monkeys biting hundreds of people for the epidemic to have broken out in such massive numbers at virtually the same time and continents apart. If the MGM (mythical green monkey) story were true, there might be 20,000—or extravagantly, perhaps 50,000, or maybe even 100,000—cases in Africa, rather than the thirty million known cases by 1992. The MGM story cannot withstand any serious scrutiny. Let us reject that theory out of hand. An exhaustive examination of a colony of green monkeys later revealed no trace of the AIDS virus. The AIDS virus does not occur naturally in the green monkey. According to

intelligence information, the HIV virus had previously never occurred in any animals. And it has since been proven that it is genetically impossible to transfer any virus from green monkey cells to man. Not to mention that green monkeys

don't exist in Brazil and Haiti. Where did the MGM story come from? Perhaps from the fact that polio vaccines were cultured on green

monkey kidney cells in the 1960s to produce the Salk polio vaccine. But the process went wrong and millions of people were injected with contaminated vaccine containing SV-40. Despite the desire to squash the underground rumblings around the world that AIDS is a creation of man,

no government, including the U.S. government, has to date offered any persuasive theory—or evidence to back it—to support the belief that the AIDS epidemic sprang from nature and spread in the fashion it has.

Simple logic should tell us this much: If nature was responsible for the AIDS virus and its catastrophic impact, don't you think that the U.S. government—with its massive intelligence-gathering apparatus, its

nearly limitless scientific facilities and its access to the media—would by now know at least some of the answers and present a persuasive case?

Well, it hasn't. Not even close. Could anyone who reads this even answer the question: What does the U.S. government say caused AIDS? A lame theory about the African green monkey is the best they can do—and they haven't staked their credibility even on that. It's a question the government would prefer not to answer. Why not? Because they know that no matter what theory they put forth, it's not true—and there are too many scientists around the world who would be able to discredit it. So they remain silent and trust that most people will not take the trouble to wonder why. The federal bureaucracy officially responsible for protecting us from epidemics, the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, and its staunch ally in the dissemination of disinformation, The Journal of the

American Medical Association (JAMA) have glossed right over the genesis of AIDS. Explaining the spread of a disease is quite different than explaining its origin. The CDC and JAMA stayed clear of that treacherous arena. Instead they chose to imply—and falsely—that AIDS is a sexual disease transmitted primarily by heterosexuals in Africa and homosexuals in the West. The AIDS epidemic began with a mass movement of the population from the country to the cities in Africa, we are told, with a natural increase in sexual activity. "The urbanization of Africa has been

accompanied by an increase in heterosexual activity and hyperendemicity gonorrhea," JAMA reported on October 24, 1985, by way of explaining the outbreak of AIDS. "Aids was then transmitted on a global scale primarily through homosexually mediated behavior as underscored by virtually every epidemiological study available," reported JAMA. "In America this is reflected by 13:1 preponderance of infection in males as opposed to females, an 11:1 ratio in Europe and 26:1 ratio in Australia. Sixty to a hundred percent of the total number of cases in 12 of 16 countries in Europe are in homosexual men. Overall in Europe, 78 percent of cases are in homosexual/bisexual men, and homosexual transmissions combined with IV drug abuse accounts for 87% of European cases, with considerable overlap between the two groups here and in other countries.

Bostam

[Guest guest]

Cont'd from part 11,

The official version of how AIDS began is not well known—or

documented. So it is perhaps worth an overview of how this disaster is supposed to have happened. The prevalent cover story for the spread of the AIDS epidemic is that the source of the virus was the African green monkey. To this day, most people believe that AIDS began with infected monkeys biting people. But it would have taken hundreds of monkeys biting hundreds of people for the epidemic to have broken out in such massive numbers at virtually the same time and continents apart. If the MGM (mythical green monkey) story were true, there might be 20,000—or extravagantly, perhaps 50,000, or maybe even 100,000—cases in Africa, rather than the thirty million known cases by 1992. The MGM story cannot withstand any serious scrutiny. Let us reject that theory out of hand. An exhaustive examination of a colony of green monkeys later revealed no trace of the AIDS virus. The AIDS virus does not occur naturally in the green monkey. According to

intelligence information, the HIV virus had previously never occurred in any animals. And it has since been proven that it is genetically impossible to transfer any virus from green monkey cells to man. Not to mention that green monkeys

don't exist in Brazil and Haiti. Where did the MGM story come from? Perhaps from the fact that polio vaccines were cultured on green

monkey kidney cells in the 1960s to produce the Salk polio vaccine. But the process went wrong and millions of people were injected with contaminated vaccine containing SV-40. Despite the desire to squash the underground rumblings around the world that AIDS is a creation of man,

no government, including the U.S. government, has to date offered any persuasive theory—or evidence to back it—to support the belief that the AIDS epidemic sprang from nature and spread in the fashion it has.

Simple logic should tell us this much: If nature was responsible for the AIDS virus and its catastrophic impact, don't you think that the U.S. government—with its massive intelligence-gathering apparatus, its

nearly limitless scientific facilities and its access to the media—would by now know at least some of the answers and present a persuasive case?

Well, it hasn't. Not even close. Could anyone who reads this even answer the question: What does the U.S. government say caused AIDS? A lame theory about the African green monkey is the best they can do—and they haven't staked their credibility even on that. It's a question the government would prefer not to answer. Why not? Because they know that no matter what theory they put forth, it's not true—and there are too many scientists around the world who would be able to discredit it. So they remain silent and trust that most people will not take the trouble to wonder why. The federal bureaucracy officially responsible for protecting us from epidemics, the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, and its staunch ally in the dissemination of disinformation, The Journal of the

American Medical Association (JAMA) have glossed right over the genesis of AIDS. Explaining the spread of a disease is quite different than explaining its origin. The CDC and JAMA stayed clear of that treacherous arena. Instead they chose to imply—and falsely—that AIDS is a sexual disease transmitted primarily by heterosexuals in Africa and homosexuals in the West. The AIDS epidemic began with a mass movement of the population from the country to the cities in Africa, we are told, with a natural increase in sexual activity. "The urbanization of Africa has been

accompanied by an increase in heterosexual activity and hyperendemicity gonorrhea," JAMA reported on October 24, 1985, by way of explaining the outbreak of AIDS. "Aids was then transmitted on a global scale primarily through homosexually mediated behavior as underscored by virtually every epidemiological study available," reported JAMA. "In America this is reflected by 13:1 preponderance of infection in males as opposed to females, an 11:1 ratio in Europe and 26:1 ratio in Australia. Sixty to a hundred percent of the total number of cases in 12 of 16 countries in Europe are in homosexual men. Overall in Europe, 78 percent of cases are in homosexual/bisexual men, and homosexual transmissions combined with IV drug abuse accounts for 87% of European cases, with considerable overlap between the two groups here and in other countries.

Bostam