THE TRUTH BEHIND AIDS PT 22

[Guest guest]

cont'd from part 21

On April 28-May 1, 1985, the Banbury Conference on Genetically-Altered Viruses and Environment was held at Banbury Center Laboratories. Banbury Center is the former Eugenics Records Office in Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island. The old Harriman laboratories, which began in 1904 with eugenics experiments designed to create a "perfect" white race and worked for the destruction of blacks and poor

whites during the pellagra scourge and opened its facilities to German Nazi scientists during the Thirties, hosted this event.17 The world's foremost molecular biologists and virologists assembled for a conference on: the epidemiology of viruses altered by man. While ostensibly held under the auspices of the Cold Spring Harbor facility, the gathering was carefully supervised and monitored by the U.S. government. At the

instruction of several U.S. intelligence agencies, the proceedings deemed sensitive were held under conditions of strict secrecy.The official sponsors of the conference were almost all multinational corporations—or their private foundations—with close links to the Olympians. The roster was as follows:

IBM.

The Grace Foundation Inc.

Texaco Philanthropic Foundation Inc.

The Chevron Fund.

The Dow Chemical Company.

Exxon Corporation.

Petroleum Foundation Inc.

The Bristol Myers Fund Inc.

Rockwell International Corporation Trust.

The Procter and Gamble Company.

These organizations all donated large sums of money for future research. The U.S. government also contributed a substantial amount of money, although the exact amount could not be determined. Letters of

inquiry about this use of taxpayer funds, addressed to the General Accounting Office, went unanswered. Other corporate sponsors who donated various sums of money were mainly drawn from the Olympian

network, and for this reason, they are significant:

E. L. du Pont de Nemours and Company.

Hoffman-La Roche.

Monsanto Company.

Agrigenics Corporation.

Beckton Dickinson and Company.

Ciba-Geigy Corporation.

Genetics Institute.

and .

Schering Plough Corporation.

Up Company.

Genentech Inc.

American International.

Biogen S.A.

Eli Lilly and Co.

Pall Corporation.

American Cyanamid Company.

Cetus Corporation.

Pfizer Inc.

CPC International Inc.

Mitsui Toatsu Chemicals Inc.

Kline and French Laboratories.

Nearly all of the above are top companies in the pharmaceutical industry or leaders in genetic research. All are connected in one way or another with Rockefeller, the Harrimans and the Banks.

In the spring of 1985, the American public was not yet concerned about AIDS. The President of the United States had never spoken the word publicly. It was still regarded as a curse upon drug addicts and

homosexuals. Most Americans believed that their odds of infection were about the same as hitting the lottery. Rock Hudson was still alive. It was his death that October that shocked the national media—and the public—into asking serious questions about this thing called AIDS. The notion that it was created by human hand was nothing more than sick fantasy.

Fact or fantasy? You decide after reading E. D. Kilbourne's paper "Epidemiology of Viruses Altered By Man" presented to the Conference. Kilbourne went into great detail about what he called a "maximally

malignant monster virus," (MMMV) which he stated could be created in spite of the difficulties that would be encountered in synthesizing it.

His paper was, in effect, a mere confirmation, although he posed it hypothetically: "Because we know the primary structure of many viral genes and have the technical capacity to synthesize both genes and gene products, it would appear that planned design of friendly or unfriendly

viruses is not too remote a possibility. If the latter should be the perverse goal of our paranoid society, can we construct a virus worse than rabies virus with its 100 percent fatality rate or influenza with its pandemic potential for twenty million deaths worldwide? Hypothetically: yes.

"But if the creation of MMMV is unlikely to the point of absurdity, we must also appreciate that in the proper setting single base changes may be sufficient to significantly influence viral properties, including virulence.

Then in an amazing revelation, Kilbourne seemed to come close to admitting that AIDS was indeed a created retrovirus, although he did not actually name it: "The more imaginative vistas of genetic engineering are concerned less with the modification of existing viruses than with the segregation and manipulation of single virus genes. Perforce, the

epidemiology of virus genes in new environmental or even different temporal context must be considered." In other words, the creation of new retroviruses was what appealed to the most advanced

microbiologists. Kilbourne then issued a warning that the freezers of most laboratories "are potential if unlikely sources of new pathogens…Manipulation of the genes of viruses capable of genetic reassortment must not be undertaken without awareness that these viruses comprise an extended genotype or gene reservoir available for interspecific viral gene transmission." Research of this nature was precisely what was done at Fort Detrick and Los Alamos and Cold Spring Harbor. One of the most telling admissions during the Conference came when it was disclosed that the purpose of genetic tinkering with the envelope of the HIV virus was to broaden the range of target cells for infection.

Bostam.

[Guest guest]

cont'd from part 21

On April 28-May 1, 1985, the Banbury Conference on Genetically-Altered Viruses and Environment was held at Banbury Center Laboratories. Banbury Center is the former Eugenics Records Office in Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island. The old Harriman laboratories, which began in 1904 with eugenics experiments designed to create a "perfect" white race and worked for the destruction of blacks and poor

whites during the pellagra scourge and opened its facilities to German Nazi scientists during the Thirties, hosted this event.17 The world's foremost molecular biologists and virologists assembled for a conference on: the epidemiology of viruses altered by man. While ostensibly held under the auspices of the Cold Spring Harbor facility, the gathering was carefully supervised and monitored by the U.S. government. At the

instruction of several U.S. intelligence agencies, the proceedings deemed sensitive were held under conditions of strict secrecy.The official sponsors of the conference were almost all multinational corporations—or their private foundations—with close links to the Olympians. The roster was as follows:

IBM.

The Grace Foundation Inc.

Texaco Philanthropic Foundation Inc.

The Chevron Fund.

The Dow Chemical Company.

Exxon Corporation.

Petroleum Foundation Inc.

The Bristol Myers Fund Inc.

Rockwell International Corporation Trust.

The Procter and Gamble Company.

These organizations all donated large sums of money for future research. The U.S. government also contributed a substantial amount of money, although the exact amount could not be determined. Letters of

inquiry about this use of taxpayer funds, addressed to the General Accounting Office, went unanswered. Other corporate sponsors who donated various sums of money were mainly drawn from the Olympian

network, and for this reason, they are significant:

E. L. du Pont de Nemours and Company.

Hoffman-La Roche.

Monsanto Company.

Agrigenics Corporation.

Beckton Dickinson and Company.

Ciba-Geigy Corporation.

Genetics Institute.

and .

Schering Plough Corporation.

Up Company.

Genentech Inc.

American International.

Biogen S.A.

Eli Lilly and Co.

Pall Corporation.

American Cyanamid Company.

Cetus Corporation.

Pfizer Inc.

CPC International Inc.

Mitsui Toatsu Chemicals Inc.

Kline and French Laboratories.

Nearly all of the above are top companies in the pharmaceutical industry or leaders in genetic research. All are connected in one way or another with Rockefeller, the Harrimans and the Banks.

In the spring of 1985, the American public was not yet concerned about AIDS. The President of the United States had never spoken the word publicly. It was still regarded as a curse upon drug addicts and

homosexuals. Most Americans believed that their odds of infection were about the same as hitting the lottery. Rock Hudson was still alive. It was his death that October that shocked the national media—and the public—into asking serious questions about this thing called AIDS. The notion that it was created by human hand was nothing more than sick fantasy.

Fact or fantasy? You decide after reading E. D. Kilbourne's paper "Epidemiology of Viruses Altered By Man" presented to the Conference. Kilbourne went into great detail about what he called a "maximally

malignant monster virus," (MMMV) which he stated could be created in spite of the difficulties that would be encountered in synthesizing it.

His paper was, in effect, a mere confirmation, although he posed it hypothetically: "Because we know the primary structure of many viral genes and have the technical capacity to synthesize both genes and gene products, it would appear that planned design of friendly or unfriendly

viruses is not too remote a possibility. If the latter should be the perverse goal of our paranoid society, can we construct a virus worse than rabies virus with its 100 percent fatality rate or influenza with its pandemic potential for twenty million deaths worldwide? Hypothetically: yes.

"But if the creation of MMMV is unlikely to the point of absurdity, we must also appreciate that in the proper setting single base changes may be sufficient to significantly influence viral properties, including virulence.

Then in an amazing revelation, Kilbourne seemed to come close to admitting that AIDS was indeed a created retrovirus, although he did not actually name it: "The more imaginative vistas of genetic engineering are concerned less with the modification of existing viruses than with the segregation and manipulation of single virus genes. Perforce, the

epidemiology of virus genes in new environmental or even different temporal context must be considered." In other words, the creation of new retroviruses was what appealed to the most advanced

microbiologists. Kilbourne then issued a warning that the freezers of most laboratories "are potential if unlikely sources of new pathogens…Manipulation of the genes of viruses capable of genetic reassortment must not be undertaken without awareness that these viruses comprise an extended genotype or gene reservoir available for interspecific viral gene transmission." Research of this nature was precisely what was done at Fort Detrick and Los Alamos and Cold Spring Harbor. One of the most telling admissions during the Conference came when it was disclosed that the purpose of genetic tinkering with the envelope of the HIV virus was to broaden the range of target cells for infection.

Bostam.