Guest guest Posted January 24, 2002 Report Share Posted January 24, 2002 I'm assuming there are many other misleading facts/statistics in here. How do you go about giving the other side? I find it very confusing when I read articles like this. I don't know how to validate/invalidate what I read. I want to know how to respond to people when they put an article in my face and say " see, you don't know what you are talking about. " For example, how do you respond to the following statements? " In 1969, when the vaccination program began, 57,600 rubella cases were reported in the United States. However, annually from 1990 through 1999, the median number of reported rubella cases was 232, " said a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The data " suggest that the United States is on the verge of elimination of the disease, " said the study published in this week's edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association. True or untrue? in Maine > Senior Staff <ishgooda@v...> > > {NOTE: What this report fails to mention is the vaccine eliminates maternal > transmission of rubella antibodies..no one will be naturally immune if all > should be immunized...Ish} > > Report sees eradication of rubella in U.S. > http://webcenter.newssearch.netscape.com/aolns_display.adp? key=2002012212590 > 0029\ 0764_aolns.src > > CHICAGO, Jan 22 (Reuters) - Rubella, also known as German measles, has > nearly been eradicated in the United States by vaccinations and the same > goal may be within reach in the Western Hemisphere, researchers reported on > Tuesday. > > The greatest threat from the disease is to unborn children who run a risk of > vision, hearing and heart defects if their mothers contract it and pass it > to them in the womb. > > " In 1969, when the vaccination program began, 57,600 rubella cases were > reported in the United States. However, annually from 1990 through 1999, the > median number of reported rubella cases was 232, " said a report from the > Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. > > " Since 1992 fewer than half of the states reported cases of rubella, with > four or fewer states annually reporting a majority of the cases, " it added. > > The data " suggest that the United States is on the verge of elimination of > the disease, " said the study published in this week's edition of the Journal > of the American Medical Association. > > It said rubella now occurs mainly among foreign-born Hispanic adults who are > either unvaccinated or whose vaccination status is unknown. There is very > limited spread and circulation among the U.S. resident population, it said. > > " The current epidemiology in the United States demonstrates the > effectiveness of a successful rubella vaccination program, " the report said. > > " If all countries in the Western Hemisphere achieve and maintain high > immunization childhood coverage and ensure immunity in women of childbearing > age, the goal of eliminating indigenous transmission is achievable, " it > added. > > Of 47 countries in the Americas, 44 have such programs, but most have been > running for fewer than three years. The remaining three nations -- the > Dominican Republic, Peru and Guatemala -- expect to have programs by the end > of this year, the study said. [if you got here from frontpage Native News > Online, click here to return: http://216.97.43.231/ ] COMMENTS? > http://nativenewsonline.org/Guestbook/guestbook.cgi Reprinted under the Fair > Use http://nativenewsonline.org/fairuse.htm <<<<<>>>>> Tsonkwadiyonrat (We > are ONE Spirit) http://nativenewsonline.org/ Native News Online a Service of > Barefoot Connection > > FREE LEONARD PELTIER!! " YOU ~ARE~ THE MESSAGE " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2002 Report Share Posted January 24, 2002 " Since 1992 fewer than half of the states reported cases of rubella, with four or fewer states annually reporting a majority of the cases, " it added well, yeah, " fewer states .... reporting " if they treat diagnosing an infectious rash the same way that they diagnose pertussis. In that, if you've been vaccinated, you CAN'T POSSIBLY .... have ... X disease.... crazy people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.